Jengawiki
That's advanced wikiknowledge, so no worries. Try Help:Infobox for starters.
Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Warranty Direct.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit
|
Hello! Jengawiki,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
|
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 18:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Warranty Direct.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! J.s.071991 (talk) 13:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Put {{subst:submit}} on the page. If that doesn't work, well, it might help if you gave a link to the article.
Vincent Liu (something to say?) 03:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
I have managed to do it now. It was a bit unorthodox but I copied and pasted the afc bit from the edit page of the article that was submitted onto the second article and then removed some parts. It is showing as being submitted on the same day as the 1st article though. However, the first article has now been reviewed but the second article has not. Is that a sign that this method will not work? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Duncan_McClure_Fisher
Jengawiki (talk) 07:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duncan McClure Fisher.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
Please rewrite the references according to the WP:Cite format so readers can see just whart they are, and whether they appear in third party sources, or just in PR releases. Otherwise, it just needs removal of a few promotional phrases, and an indication that the reporting service it offers is considered important by third parties.
Please edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Warranty Direct.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask me for help on . Please let me know when it's ready to be reviewed again.
Thank you, this feedback is much appreciated Jengawiki (talk) 15:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by SarahStierch (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duncan McClure Fisher.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duncan McClure Fisher.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey edit
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)