Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Jaysscholar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  RJFJR 14:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hip hop edit

Hi, see you're interested in hip hop? That's a good thing cause there is a lot of work to do here. Be bold when editing. Happy edits, Julien Tuerlinckx 10:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

playwright-stub edit

The {{playwright-stub}} is deprecated and in the process of being removed. In the future please use {{writer-stub}} (or one of the subtypes based on region or nationality). If the author is primarily known for writing for the theatre then also using the {{theat-stub}} is recommended. Caerwine 09:30, 25 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Liberalism in .. edit

You suggested to merge a lot of articles in the liberalism in ... series in the Liberalism article. SInce this content wouldn't fit into this article and the intention of the article is totally different, I don't think this suggestion is good. Since there is no good place to discuss the item, it is better to delete the merge message. Electionworld 07:04, 2 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

But there are articles on Elections in .., etc. It is linked to liberalism, but it doesn't fit into the main article. Electionworld 22:31, 3 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
It would become an extreme large article. In that article there was made a choiced to refer to the national articles. I see no advantage of merging the articles. - Electionworld 22:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

all that glitters edit

I removed that credit because Family Business does not use a sample of the Death In Vegas song, but both that song and Family Business use the same sample from another song. I'll try to find out what that song is. --Shawn88 09:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Singer-stub-image edit

Hi, you uploaded Image:Singerdraw.gif and labelled it PD - very nice drawing. Did you make the drawing yourself, and released it into the public domain? I was planning to transfer it to Commons, so I can use it for a singer-stub in Swedish Wikipedia. However, to do that I need to know who made the drawing. / Habj 20:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I can't put it on commons then. Too bad. / Habj 22:48, 31 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Black pepper changes edit

Hi, Jaysscholar! You should take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), which says 'Capitalise the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus "Rules and regulations", not "Rules and Regulations".' —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Centrism edit

I noticed you're politically centrist. You may be interested in Category:Moderate Wikipedians. Listing can, of course, be achieved by adding moderate to your babel box, or by adding {{User moderate}}, or [[Category:User moderate]]. Et cetera. firenexx 15:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:KClarkson.jpg edit

 
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KClarkson.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 22:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Category edit

Hello, I might be wrong, but I think you have put your User page into the incorrect category. Your in the category for Wikipedians from Georgia, the country in Eastern Europe. If you are in fact from Georgia the US state, you need to move yourself to Category:Wikipedians in Georgia, USA. Thank you. Philip Stevens 19:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Saadiq.jpg edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Saadiq.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 21:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:FergieP.jpg edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FergieP.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Wgfinley 13:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • In response to this from my talk page:
    Tags need to be supported with information on what the source of the image is, if there isn't a source there's no way to verify it's a promotional image. --Wgfinley 13:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
    And that site appears to be an unreliable repository of copyvios (copyright holder watermarks are visible on many of them). Without a source for the image (i.e. who owns the rights to it) its an unlicensed image and not something we can use. --Wgfinley 05:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Hello, I noticed you edited a Hip Hop related article. If you wish you can join the new Hip Hop Wikiproject. --Chubdub 16:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Bigboi.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigboi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Dre3000.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Dre3000.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

J.R. Smith edit

Hi, I see you are editing the J.R. Smith and Tyson Chandler articles. From where did you get this information about them officially being traded? From what I read, it was a verbal agreement. It has to be verifiable before the changes reflect on wikipedia. This is not NBA Live where you can change the information and rosters as you like... please understand that you must cite your sources. Read this: Wikipedia:Citing sources thanks--203.214.43.194 13:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |}Reply

zindane loop edit

Hey, i've updated the image and made it loop 4 times. sikander 21:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Staceydash.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Staceydash.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Stacey Dash edit

I removed the tags because it's 3 (almost 4) paragraphs and I just don't think it qualifies as a stub. It has full information on her career, her family and other things. Does it have alot of detail? No. But for an actress who has been basically a b-list actress for most of her career, I think it's sufficient to be considered a full article. --Woohookitty(meow) 15:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation edit

This edit is a violation of copyright. Magazine covers may only be used to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question. Here, you are using it to depict Stuff generally. --Yamla 21:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Another copyright violation edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Image:Staceydash.jpg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Yamla 21:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Feverpromo4.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Feverpromo4.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

--Yamla 19:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

The Image:Staceydash.jpg was in a magazine and I was activly trying to get the right copyright info as seen on Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy#Magazine_Pictures. I put the proper descrition on it and had it label has promo and was pursuing if i should put something more specific. Why ban me when I'm activly pursuing the proper identification??
I also did not upload Image:Feverpromo4.jpg. I merely took {{Jay-Z}} off of it because it did not belong.
On the Stuff magazine article, I do not think it is unreasonable for me to assume that putting a magazine cover on a article about the magazine is ok. if it should only be used for that particular issue, then tell me that and direct me to the proper wikiproject so i can discuss it with the approiate people. I think a banning is a bit harsh. It was a fair assumption on my part. Direct me to the proper project.
If you see someone who is genuinly trying to improve wikipedia and has made a couple of mistakes (one of which he was actively pursuing the proper course of action), then you should direct that user to the proper areas, not ban them.

I've left a note for the blocking admin regarding Image:Feverpromo4.jpg. Regarding the other image and your comments regarding being able to use fiar use for magazine covers. Firstly as above we may have a fair use claim for magazine covers for use illustrating an article about the magazine, not for general use to illustrate the subject of that cover. General magazine content is the same, we could possibly have a fair use claim to illustrate the magazine itself, but not the subject of the photo. Use of promotional tags is for where the material has been released specifically for publicity purpose, although some magazine photos maybe those generally they will be photos taken specifically for the magazine and not generally released for any other use. See Wikipedia:Publicity_photos "Note that the above only applies to photos that are explicitly distributed for publicity purposes, and does not apply to most photographs of celebrities". --pgk(talk) 20:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
To add to this, you say you uploaded then were checking on if it was ok or not or you needed more... I would suggest that this is the wrong way around, in future find out all you need and if it is a usable image *before* uploading. --pgk(talk) 20:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Unblocked. I am sorry for blocking you when it turns out that you did not upload that image. However, please follow Pgk's advice above. Please do not upload images unless you are sure it would be usable. --Yamla 15:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Jada Fire.jpg edit

You haven't responded to my question of where I should send some clips of Jada Fire's bondage video, so I'm guessing you don't really want them. If I'm mistaken, please respond soon and give me an e-mail address to send them to. Jada69 01:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Magazine pictures edit

You said: "thx for unblocking me. Now where do I go to figure out the correct labeling of that pic?? I asked here but noone has responded. I thought I'd asked since it seems to be your area. The pic was out of a magazine. I put promo but that seems to be wrong."

We may not use magazine pictures from inside a magazine. There is no fair-use rationale. Barring exceptional circumstances, this would be a violation of copyright. --Yamla 16:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
You said: "Really?? What do you mean "fair-use rationale"? Anybody can pick up a mag off the stand and skim through and see it so I would assume its fair-use. You may have a better understanding though. Where would I go to argue this?"
No, the situations are entirely different. In your example, it is debateably fair-use because at least theoretically, you are considering whether or not to buy the magazine. In the case of Wikipedia, we cannot use the image because we are not using it to depict the publication of the particular issue of the magazine (and the cover would be the appropriate image to use if we were). The magazines pay substantial amounts of money for the images that appear inside of them and they very firmly exercise their copyrights over them. We can't just go about using someone else's copyrighted material. If you are an intellectual property lawyer, I can put you in touch with Wikipedia's legal staff where you can argue the case. Otherwise, there's not really much else you can do. Wikipedia's legal staff have already ruled on this issue. --Yamla 16:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm. The cover is fair-use to describe the issue, so could the pic be fair-use to describe the person in the image? --Jaysscholar 16:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
No. Imagine there's a cover of, say, Playboy with Jennifer Aniston on it. And furthermore, this cover generates a lot of controversy. You could now use a scan of that cover in the article on Jennifer Anison but only in the section of the article that talks about the controversy. You could not use it as the first picture right at the top-right of the page, for example. But let us look at another cover. Jennifer Anison on the cover of Cosmo. No controversy, no discussion of that particular issue in the Jennnifer Aniston article. That image could NOT be used in the article, then, because it would simply be used to depict the person and that is not fair-use. --Yamla 17:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ok, what about if there is a pic in a magazine and she is just simply modeling. no controversy or anything. regular modeling. can this image be used in a section describing how she has modeled in magazines, when she is mainly an actress? could the cover? could an image within the magazine? --Jaysscholar 17:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
No, such an image could not be used at all. The cover could be used if there's a specific discussion of that particular issue of the magazine. No image within the magazine could be used. --Yamla 17:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

re: Template:Infobox musical artist edit

Thanks, but we started implementing this template quite a while ago (you can see it on the feature articles I keep an eye on, The Supremes, The Temptations, Sly & the Family Stone, and The Jackson 5). It's going okay, although there are always problems with Wikipedia editors who think this is a personal playground or free fansite hosting. --FuriousFreddy 23:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Dem Franchize Boyz
Avant
Black Thought
Get Well Soon
Freeway (rapper)
MOBO Awards
Dave Meyers
Young Gunz
Music video director
Beanie Sigel
The Kids Will Have Their Say
Chris Casamassa
Loon (rapper)
WCWM
Damon Dash
Slim Thug
Big Daddy Kane
American Dialect Society
Statlanta
Cleanup
T.I.
Destiny's Child discography
The Source (magazine)
Merge
Pundit (politics)
Thriller (song)
List of best-selling albums in the United States
Add Sources
Bigger and Deffer
Fabolous
Timbaland
Wikify
List of BMG Music Club's top selling albums in the United States
Supermodel
Praxeology
Expand
Ginuwine
East Coast hip hop
Women's football (soccer)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Lupe Fiasco edit

Image:LupeFiascoBillboard.jpg is not discussed in the article, just mentioned. The magazine cover license says: "Note: It is not acceptable to use images with this tag in the article of the person or persons depicted on the cover, unless used directly in connection with the publication of this image." "Directly in connection" means it is a notable cover about the artist and it is widely discussed in the article of the person in the cover. -feydey 19:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Get Lost Punk edit

we're mindless teenagers having fun, drugged up on coke, man u need to cool it. Just coz u jealous of are FUN. Can u feel the love in the air. Man u need help. Woooooo smoke it. Peace out little dude.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrserious (talkcontribs) .


WPWikiProject Musicians edit

Wikipedia is in sore need of a policy on for musician pages, and you have been active in this area before. Therefore, please provide your comments and opinions on the policies there. Thanks in advance!--Esprit15d 19:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Page layout would be great.--Esprit15d 21:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


Wikipedia:WikiProject Basketball edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Basketball: Hello Jaysscholar, you may not be aware but activity and discussion are down at our WikiProject. While a to do list, and a few neat tables have been created, more discussion and action needs to take place. Please stop by the WikiProject Basketball talk page and leave your input, and ideas. Thanks KOS | talk 20:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Premier League Fixtures edit

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that future Premier League fixtures are copyrighted (see here). Only results can be posted. For now I simply removed the offending material (which can easily be retrieved from the history once the matches are completed). - Pal 20:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Microphone_20.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Microphone_20.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Jadakiss.gif edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Jadakiss.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 11:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image:Regina King.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Regina King.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 06:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:US Janet.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:US Janet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mosmof 22:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:US Janet.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:US Janet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 13:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Budden.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Budden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:US Janet.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:US Janet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Playboy_Jul_06_Vida_Guerra.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Playboy_Jul_06_Vida_Guerra.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Image:Microphone 20.GIF edit

An image that you uploaded, Image:Microphone 20.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stannered 22:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Info2.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Info2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:This Revolution.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:This Revolution.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of John Alvarez edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John Alvarez, by Cquan, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John Alvarez seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John Alvarez, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate John Alvarez itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:ChesnuTT.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ChesnuTT.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Djquik.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Djquik.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:ELCS01E11.gif edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E11.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:ELCS01E09.gif edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E09.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:ELCS01E06.gif edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E06.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:ELCS01E01.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kanye TTS.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kanye TTS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:KWest All Falls Down.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KWest All Falls Down.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:K-os Atlantis.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:K-os Atlantis.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Boondockss1e10.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Boondockss1e10.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ELCS01E01.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ELCS01E06.gif) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E06.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ELCS01E09.gif) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E09.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ELCS01E11.gif) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:ELCS01E11.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tougher than leather.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Tougher than leather.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Dead Prez.jpg edit

 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Dead Prez.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. east.718 10:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Beautiful Mix CD edit

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Beautiful Mix CD, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Spellcast 20:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Beautifulmixtape.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Beautifulmixtape.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Seinfeld WikiProject Invite edit

Hey there. I couldn't help noticing you appear to be interested in Seinfeld. I am interested in setting up a Seinfeld WikiProject to improve articles related to Seinfeld. At the moment I am just looking for people who are interested in joining. If you are interested in joining, please add your name here or contact me on my talk page. Thankyou, Joelster 06:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Tamar05.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Tamar05.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 02:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Chappellejackson.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chappellejackson.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 16:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Exitalbum.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Exitalbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KM Monster.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:KM Monster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Falwellhustler.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Falwellhustler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Burzmali (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Thanks edit

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your contributions to Lupe Fiasco, which has fairly recently achieved WP:GA status. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hells yea -- Jaysscholar (talk) 03:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of WWE pay-per-view events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosemont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Jaysscholar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ms. Hill edit

 

The article Ms. Hill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability or sources--there are a lot of bootlegs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply