September 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. Your recent edit to the page Jay Rock appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 21:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If you would like to discuss the unsourced information you are replacing the sourced information with you will need to provide proof of your own.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

I'm just woundiring how Many leftover track you did Radmir (talk) 07:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Yg the crazy rapper from cpt cali.jpeg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Yg the crazy rapper from cpt cali.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

please stop changing If You're Reading This... to a mixtape, its incorrect and the Wikipedia community decided on "commercial release" as its much closer to an album than a mixtape, read the footnote and please do not change in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmithN41V (talkcontribs) 10:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to If You're Reading This It's Too Late has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at If You're Reading This It's Too Late with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. /wia /talk 15:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to Jesus Piece (album) edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jesus Piece (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


  Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 09:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Game discography.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Game discography was changed by Jayceon123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956657 on 2015-09-27T09:55:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to The Documentary 2 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Documentary 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JustBerry (talk) 03:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I understand that you have been asked to provide references in the past. Please read WP:Verifiability, and feel free to leave any questions, comments, or concerns you may have on my talk page. --JustBerry (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Record Sales on The Game Discography edit

You need to use reliable sources if you want to update the record sales. This means finding the sources, and then citing them along with the updated record numbers on The Game's discography page. You're welcome to ask me if you have any more questions. -Zsxd (talk) 03:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

2015 In Hip Hop edit

Hey, it's not that I'm a Drake "dickrider". It's just that Drake's commercial mixtape had more reviews than Jay Rock's album. His album had 7 reviews when Drake had 33. It's doesn't matter than 90059 had the highest review. As long as it's reached 15 reviews, i'll leave it alone.

2015 hip hop 2 edit

Right on top of where you edit, it says this, . Find it you 10-year-old.

October 2015 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on If You're Reading This It's Too Late. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Calidum 15:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are not in a position to threaten other editors with a block as you did here and here. Please watch your step, lest you find yourself blocked. General Ization Talk 14:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Blood Moon: Year of the Wolf. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. General Ization Talk 14:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Documentary 2. You also deleted several {{citation needed}} tags, which suggests that you don't understand or don't care about the role citations play in allowing other editors to verify information on Wikipedia. AtticusX (talk) 08:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Unverified numbers, deletion of tags, abusive behavior toward other editors, and chronic edit-warring edit

Removing {{failed verification}}, {{unreliable source}}, and {{citation needed}} tags without resolving the problems they mark, as you've done at The Game discography, tells us you're not interested in helping anyone verify your numbers. Since you're the one who increased all the album sales numbers on that page, taking the numbers out of sync with their original sources, the WP:BURDEN is on you to provide accurate citations that allow other editors to verify your new numbers. If you got your sales numbers from the SoundScan database, then for Pete's sake, provide citations pointing to the SoundScan database, as I previously advised you. Offline sources are usually OK as long as you provide enough specific details about the source in each citation that any reader with access to the same source could easily retrace your steps and find the same information. Why cite some anonymous internet forum whose numbers don't even match the numbers you put in the article, if that's not really where you pulled the numbers from? Why this unwillingness to add citations that honestly reflect where your numbers came from?

On a more urgent note, you should know that Wikipedia has very little tolerance for abusive, disrespectful behavior toward other editors, as in edit summaries like this one.

And despite having been warned against edit-warring, you appear to have been engaged in a long-term edit-war with User:Koala15 at Blood Moon: Year of the Wolf for some time now. Considering how many times you've been warned and then continued to violate Wikipedia's editing policies, I'm kind of amazed you haven't been blocked yet. AtticusX (talk) 07:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked from editing edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of three days for edit warring and making personal attacks, as you did at The Game discography and Blood Moon: Year of the Wolf. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Omni Flames. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Documentary 2.5 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 08:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Documentary 2. Binksternet (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Jayceon123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply