Your submission at Articles for creation: Dead Talk Live (Talk Show) (February 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Javiem88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javiem88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to edit Walking Dead Page but not allowed, why? Michael Satrazemis is a long time director and producer of walking dead. He deserves wiki. Why you delete them? Wikipeople fix mistakes and add information. My information is true. Javiem88 (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You will need to address your sockpuppetry before we can consider unblocking you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. O Still Small Voice of Clam 21:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javiem88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i clicked linke for sokpuppet and it says for people with multiple accounts. i want to make additions for company i worked for, indepenendence air. i am an airline mechanic. i used to work for independence air when called atlantic coast airlines. company failed but wiki did not mention probelm with unions. i went to add information but needed wiki account. created and edit information on independence air, airline mechanics and walking dead, my favorite show. could not edit walking ded page. so went to daryl's page and looked for satrazemis and satrazemis has no wiki. i created one for him. he is with the walking dead since the beginning of show. more than 10 years. i also added link for dead talk live. all walking dead characters have been on dead talk live. dead talk live link was red. so i added page. i use wiki for many years first time editing. please explain problem with my account Javiem88 (talk) 22:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You need to address why you were blocked: you are accused of being a sock puppet of Johnviz (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i search google again and it said to ask questions here. when will unblock be moved? will i have to redo all work from yesterday or will it be restored? sorry forgot to sign Javiem88 (talk) 23:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javiem88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i am confused. how do I do that? my name Javier Mendez, I live in queens ny. this is the only time I create wiki account. I asked my family and they don't have a wiki account. I do not sockpuppet. Please tell me proper way to address it. please. tell me what to send and how to send Javiem88 (talk) 00:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per Beyond My ken below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello? Javiem88 (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

How do you come to own the copyright to File:LiveTalk.jpg? What exactly made you create Draft:Dead_Talk_Live, now deleted, mere hours after it was deleted originally for multiple violations? Please be very exact and specific in your answers. --Yamla (talk) 01:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

the picture is profile picture for dead talk live on fb. fb has download button for picutres, so it is ok. i am a walking dead fan that is why i created a page for michael satrazemis. If it's a duplicate, i am sorry. michael satrazemis, greg nicotero and almost all actors on walking dead appear on talking dead and dead talk live. talking dead was wiki page but dead talk live does not. like michael satrazemis i create page for satrazemis and dead talk live. if duplicates, i am sorry but they don't show up in your search. Javiem88 (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

The image was earlier speedily deleted at Commons after being nominated on 12 January 2021. [1] It was uploaded there by User:Jarianz99, whom CU on en.wiki has determined is a sockpuppet of User:Johnziv, using the same IP. Clearly, these are all the same person. I've re-nominated the image for deletion at Commons as a previously deleted image. This editor obviously doesn't own the rights, as the website it comes from is tagged as "Copyright © 2021 - Dead Talk Live - All Rights Reserved." There is no compatible license. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

ok, sorry. is my block fixed? Javiem88 (talk) 04:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javiem88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i'm sorry about picture. fb picture say you can download them. did not know about rights. won't use pictures unless i take them. so all this because of the picture? i'm trying to understand. i thought it was because you thought i was somebody other. my sister is trying to help me too. Javiem88 (talk) 04:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The image issue is only one small part of the problem; you have not adequately addressed the clear sock or meat puppetry. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hello? Javiem88 (talk) 04:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

is there something more that i need to do? please tell me Javiem88 (talk) 06:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javiem88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

please explain to me how to address it? what do i need to submit. what is the right procedure? i am sorry about picture. what am i doing that shows, you said clear sockpoppetry. your link says sokpuppet is having more than 1 account. do i not understand it right? you asked to expalin in detail why i made my edits and i explained. i do not understand. most companies send warning if you do something wrong but you blocked me right away. please tell me the procedure. do i open another account but that would then be more than 1 account. is this account officially closed so i am free to open other account? please let me know what to do. my sister helped me write the edits correctly. if they was done wrongly please delete that and tell me to do it correctly. Javiem88 (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Per WP:MEAT, "A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining." If you are not Johnviz, this has happened. See User talk:Johnviz for details. You may not edit Wikipedia, and you may not create a new account. See WP:STANDARDOFFER for a possible way out. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

can you close this account for me so i can open new account so i have only one account? please Javiem88 (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply