JaunWhick01

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JaunWhick01. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! – Ammarpad (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello this is my user page, don't know how you found it but dont expect much as im not very great at making wiki articles. The Holocaust is a lie; The Leuchter Reports http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/16-tlr.pdf

T25 medium tank moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, T25 medium tank, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 15:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 15:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JaunWhick01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here I believe i should be unblocked and my account privileges reinstated. I know what Ive done is not allowed on this site and do not wish to repeat it, I have been positively contributing else where as well with multiple pages being edited and drafted on AFVs. Again I do regret my actions, but will not denounce my beliefs. If my account is to be restored I will not continue in any further offenses.

Decline reason:

I will certainly not unblock someone who claims, here on their user talk page, "The Holocaust is a lie", and I would strongly oppose anyone else doing so. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC))

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To unblock you I would want you to agree to a topic ban from editing about anything related to the Holocaust or Holocaust denial(broadly construed), along with any conditions Doug Weller might have. 331dot (talk) 07:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: it would have to be more than that (and include of course not just articles but talk pages etc). It would have to include anything to do with Jews or Judaism (including the ARBPIA area). I'm also concerned with the editors interest in WWII - you may recall we had a recent case involving concern that there was often too much of a pro-Nazi bias in some articles. I'd need to think about how to avoid problems in that area. Doug Weller talk 07:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Upon reflection, I would agree with that. 331dot (talk) 07:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

If anyone wants to unblock someone who claims "The Holocaust is a lie", I would oppose it strongly enough to insist on a community decision at WP:AN. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

I noticed this at Leuchter report and would like to add that disagreement with the statement "The Holocaust is a lie" is not the issue. Instead, for me at least, the issue is whether an editor with that view is able to apply Wikipedia's policies regarding reliable sources and neutral point of view. Clearly the answer is no for someone who has read sufficient to know about Fred A. Leuchter yet who edits with a view that the Holocaust is a lie. Johnuniq (talk) 09:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

That's part of it, to make it as policy based as possible. But I'd argue that a mind that is capable of holding such an appalling opinion is one that is not compatible with Wikipedia's core ethos. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: sorry, thinking more about this I'm convinced by the arguments that they won't be able to apply our policies and guidelines. After all, that was part of why I blocked him. Doug Weller talk 11:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Don't be sorry, this is why I bring it up. 331dot (talk) 11:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:T25 medium tank concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:T25 medium tank, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:T25 medium tank has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:T25 medium tank. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 16:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:T25 medium tank

Hello, JaunWhick01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:T25 medium tank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)