Jamesooders

This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

Howdy

Im James, Im part of the team that distroys vandalisum that people inject into articles, eg, people putting smart comments into articles for everyone to see. This is my communication page here on wikipedia, if you need to message me this is the place to do it. and remember to sign your posts !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (type ~~~~ at the end of you message before submitting it.)

If you want to know more about what I do here on wikipedia, go to my user page. James, sorry about my last edit. I was trying to make a joke for one of my friends and didn't know about the sandbox. was not trying to be a vandal. In the future I will preview my edit and not save it. thanks for the heads up. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.97.168.59 (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate the heads up. I can always use the help. Tiderolls 15:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Thank you

My pleasure :-) Maen. K. A. (talk) 16:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi. I've looked at your other account that had the name change, and I see you also used it for counter vandalism work. I'm not going to grant rollback at the monent because in general I'd expect to see slightly more uses of WP:UNDO to show you can clearly identify what are good and bad edits. If rollback is misused it can cause a lot of pain and bad feeling. I'm not trying to make you jump through any hoops or anything but perhaps a few days showing some good counter vandalism with undo or simple reverting would be a good idea. Please then feel free to ask me to take a look again. Pedro :  Chat  14:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I've taken a further look at the counter vandalism efforts you made yesterday and it all seems good, particularly when coupled with the edits from the other account. I've now granted the roolback tool. Please see WP:RBK for full instructions and remember to only use it for clear cut vandalism. Any problems let me know. Pedro :  Chat  08:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I notice you're loving huggle!! Pedro :  Chat  18:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I couldn't see the wikiproject template in this talk with the Huggle, I just saw this, and that's vandalism for me, so it was my mistake; but was necessary to put a warn template in my talk? Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 18:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

... for reverting the vandalism on my talkpage.

~Beano~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

Frustration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.16.167 (talk) 06:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Template:Vandalism information

Did you really mean to change that to 1? Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 07:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

You didn't cause any trouble; just a little confusion. Next time you change it, leave a reason in the info parameter and sign it. That way, we know that you were not just testing the template as some people sometimes do. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 07:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Are you having trouble updating the Template? I Fix the problem. But, please be a little more careful...--Michael (Talk) 02:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Please when updating the Template:Vandalism information. Please sign and date your own post and please change the info. Don’t just change the Vandalism Level from 4 to 3 without doing this. Because everyone thinks that I change this info when I didn’t.--Michael (Talk) 18:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Its ok, The Vandalism peak today at 20 rpm witch was a level 2 (high level of vandalism). Remember to change the rpm number also. Thanks.--Michael (Talk) 01:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

April 25th, 2009

No problem :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocknroll714 (talk • contribs) 10:06, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

User page

You should probably put your user information on your user page. I know that it is only an idea, but the red link to the page makes you look newer than you really are. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. It's much appreciated! Icseaturtles★ 10:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

December 25th, 2008

Man, don't worry, OK? I know perfectly well what I'm doing. It's all in good faith. Peace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erty906 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher application

Dear Jamesooders,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join #wikimedia-npw.

SoWhy 11:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert of my talkpage :) Neu_tralle 16:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

User:OllyOlyosia

It looks to me, since he moved the info to his sandbox, and since he is the only editor to the Gourdinian article (the other edits are just people putting/removing AFD/speedy tags), and since there's an AFD on the article right now, that the user is unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies, and was essentially trying to userfy the page, but didn't understand the proper procedures for that. It doesn't seem to me that level 4 warnings are appropriate, because it doesn't seem to me to be intentional vandalism. Just my two cents, though, and I don't mean to be second-guessing your actions, or whatever... --Miskwito (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Donaldson

I'd like to know what exactly is unconstructive with clarifying that he was bisexual rather than gay. The current quote refers to his "homosexual" identity whereas only two paragraphs down the same article he emphasizes that since 1966 he has been identifying as bisexual.80.178.18.208 (talk) 11:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

163.153.220.1

Hi. Thank you for reverting the edits made to Prohibition in the United States. The school district involved has followed up and reports "The responsible student has been identified and dealt with." Take care. --NERIC-Security (talk) 13:35, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Shameless thankspam

FlyingToaster Barnstar

Hello Jamesooders! Thank you so much for your support in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of 126/32/5. I am truly humbled by the trust you placed in me, and will endeavor to live up to that trust. FlyingToaster

re: Thanks

No problem. Good anti-vandlaism work BTW, keep bumping into you :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 15:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, it's getting clogged up a bit, but if I give it a bit of time it's fine when it's not trying to revert. Also, I'm working from a netbook, so it's hard to compare. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

ThankSpam

My RfA Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton and Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 18:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC) ~~~~~

Well, back to the office it is...

Revert on Port Phillip Correctional Centre‎

Just to let you know that I reverted your revert on the above article as the IP editor's edit was legit. I've also removed the vandal warning from his talk page. Please slow down a bit and take time to check what it is you're reverting. All the best. --WebHamster 11:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

No probs, we've all done it :) --WebHamster 14:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Ugly Betty June 2009

Removing the warning I accidently gave to my self

The edit isnt unconstructive. It is valid. Fans are worried as are critics that ABC is trying to dump the show. 70.108.49.218 (talk) 15:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your contributions but the comments you have added to the article ugly betty do not meet to the wikipedia guidelines, seconded by webhamster as he has reverted your edits as well. the comments that you have added are a personal attack towards the ABC. By the way, could you please remove my own warning I gave to you off my talk page please? there was no need for that, im not sure weather this was a mistake or not but if you fail remove it im going to have to give you a formal warning which could lead to a edit ban, if you could do that i would appreciate it Thankyou James'ööders 15:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

I feel there was no need 4 u 2 put a warning on my talk page. If you dont want others to write to you dont write to them. Here are just some of the many sources :

• http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/05/scoop-abc-defen.html EW.com UB moves to Friday Night Death Slot
• http://www.tvguide.com/news/fall-tv-abc-1006175.aspx ABC Puts UB on Friday Night To Die
• http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2009/05/why-abcs-ugly-betty-move-makes-sense.html UB Moves to Fridays
• http://www.businessinsider.com/abc-makes-some-surprising-moves-with-fall-schedule-2009-5 ABC Suprisingly Moves UB To Fridays . 70.108.97.99 (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

RE revert from changes to [Dragon Ball Online] page

Hey there, we have a static IP here, so someone must have made a change to a page, but noone is owning up to it. Is there a way i can access the history and see what was written? Thanks.(talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.138.15.34 (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for catching that vandalism on my talk page. Working with CVN sometimes means you annoy people as I'm sure you're aware HistoryStudent113 (talk) 03:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: my edit to User:alethiophile

I am alethiophile, and I am, in fact, intentionally clearing my userpage. Sorry, I should have logged in first. 71.196.245.253 (talk) 18:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Apricot Tree Management Consulting

Hi. Just to let you know that you overlooked something when you reverted apparent vandalism on this page. I placed a speedy deletion tag, the author blanked the page and you reverted as vandalism and warned the author. Actually {{db-author}} now applies because the author was the only person who had made any significant contribution to the page. Cheers. andy (talk) 12:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jamesooders - Mader's Cove update

I recently added a few brief updates to the "Mader's Cove" page. I was very excited to see that this page existed in the first place, as my family is from nova scotia and its a very small part of canadian history/geography. I added the little bit we know about the area yesterday.

Unfortunately a co-worker of mine saw me viewing that page today and thought it would be funny to edit my post.

Any update referring to “retarded or inbred” locals was his doing.

If it is possible to publish my original update I would be very grateful (so would the east coasters in my family). Just to recap Capt. Mace and David Mader are both “founding fathers” of the community. According to local historians they were friends and Mader did die in his late 20’s apparently from syphilis.

Thank you in advance,

Steve —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.14.169.242 (talk) 13:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jamesooders - Mader's Cove update

I recently added a few brief updates to the "Mader's Cove" page. I was very excited to see that this page existed in the first place, as my family is from nova scotia and its a very small part of canadian history/geography. I added the little bit we know about the area yesterday.

Unfortunately a co-worker of mine saw me viewing that page today and thought it would be funny to edit my post.

Any update referring to “retarded or inbred” locals was his doing.

If it is possible to publish my original update I would be very grateful (so would the east coasters in my family). Just to recap Capt. Mace and David Mader are both “founding fathers” of the community. According to local historians they were friends and Mader did die in his late 20’s apparently from syphilis.

Thank you in advance,

Steve —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.14.169.242 (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Jamesooders,

Thanks alot for changing it back. I'm a big supporter of the site and will do my part to keep it as clean as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.14.169.242 (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi James for http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nochex&diff=prev&oldid=370096125 that was not very clear vandalism, but it was an unhelpful edit. Normally for this sort of thing I would undo this and put "opinion" after the edit summary. You can sign your talk with ~~~~. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

You can issue a warning first. If damage is being caused with WP:Rollback it can be revoked. There should be more edit summaries so as to know what is going on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

A look at the IPs contribs are sufficient, I AGF originally, and this user is taking things out of context; no abuse of rollback  – Tommy [message] 16:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, you just talk about it first on the talk page. The idea is that someone who does not have bad intentions, but has their edit reversed should be able to get a clue as to why, otherwise they will not learn how to improve. Be nice about any kind of warning, because of the WP:AGF (that Tommy mentioned). I have not looked at any of the other contributions so I don't know if there is any kind of real problem. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Pussy Pelmet[1]

This is a common, and humorous, slang term. If you think it's risqué, then say you are censoring for taste. Do not try to make out my edits were unconstructive". 87.115.49.30 (talk) 15:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

You left a message for me with the title; "RE: I'm not gonna say the phrase because its not cool".

Then you said, "Firstly, if your going to contribute to Wikipedia, contribute about things with common sense. I dont think many people are going to be really that interested in what you have included in that article."

It sounds to me like you are censoring, not tidying. Your whole tone, as well as your text, says this. It is not your job to censor.

Then you throw in the insult about common sense! Then you try to justify your actions with what you think people will be interested in - how do you know?

Stop censoring under the dishonest guise of anti-vandalism, or whatever other term you have for actual "bad" people trying to spike this project. 87.115.49.30 (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

• This nonsense about "censoring"--we hear this all the time, and it never amounts to anything. Wikipedia is not a free-speech zone, it is an encyclopedia. Drmies (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

If you hear it all the time, then maybe the problem is you.

An encyclopaedia? Yes, which should describe the knowledge in and of the World. Part of this world is the usage of the term "pussy pelmet". Regardless of whether you find it distasteful, it is used, as your own Google[2] search indicates. It may only be used in the UK, but that is a few million people who understand it. 87.115.49.30 (talk) 15:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Once again I see more biting from established users to anons just trying to add info. [3] he's right.  – Tommy [message] 15:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

James, you said

• Why are you so persistant to have this phrase injected? As I said I'm not going to stop you but others may. And as I can see from your editing records that this is the only article youve contributed to. My personal Opinion is that its innapropreate. Others may agree to as we tend to see hundreds of editors ding this sort of thing, and as Drmies mentioned, "This nonsense about "censoring"--we hear this all the time, and it never amounts to anything. Wikipedia is not a free-speech zone, it is an encyclopedia.". There are hndreds of thing you could contribute to the thousands of articles on the Wikimedia Project, but this aint one of them. I recognise your effort though and Thankyou

Actually I thought I made some small edit to something a few months ago, but maybe I didn't do it correctly. Anyway.

So you admit that it is a personal opinion on it's suitability. In such a case you should find a policy with which you can justify your censorship, motivated, as you admit, by personal taste.

"persistent to inject" that is the sort of Fox News way of putting it. It was a simple edit now become a pain in the arse because of you two editors who I grow weary with. If you really wish to censor this thing then go ahead. I expect many sensible grown-ups have been put off by children like yourselves. This sensible grown up will not be coming back here again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.49.30 (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Really, I am trying to assume good faith with you but don't make it difficult. There's no censorship so you can stop with that. I'll readd it if I can find a better site for the term. Thank you.  – Tommy [message] 16:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I have a reply that may interest you, especially if you're interested in stopping vandalism.  – Tommy [message] 17:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Revert...

You're kidding, right? You reverted without reading the edit notes or looking at the reversion didn't you? 124.179.202.174 (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I guess that one accidently pushed some buttons 124.179.202.174 (talk) 05:38, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I was happy with the way we left things, the cookie wasn't needed, but it was appreciated. Thanks. 203.35.82.133 (talk) 03:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page, and for the cookie! Seaphoto^Talk 14:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the vandalism revert on my user page! --bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied

Not that it's very neccesary, but:

Hello, Jamesooders. You have new messages at Dffgd's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

23:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Fixed ~~~~

I've changed the text at the top of your page to add <nowiki> and </nowiki> tags where you apparently typed ~~~~ without the nowiki tags, putting your signature. Hope you don't mind. –dffgd 15:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Your user page

I noticed you were in the process of fixing your user page. I was wondering if I could take a crack at it by pasting it in one of my sandboxes and fixing it up there? You'd be more than welcome to assist me, and when it's done it will be moved to your user page. I've already tried it with one user (dffgd), and I'm thinking about making user page redesigning next month's focus. So what do you say? You want to give it a shot? The Utahraptor ^Talk 15:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You're gonna need more sandboxes if you keep this up. :) dffgd [messages·edits] 16:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Jamtlandic dialect

Why did you undo my redirection of Jamtlandic dialect to Jamtlandic and suggest it was "vandalism"? I have created most of the content myself and someone has committed vandalism to change the name of the article from Jamtlandic to Jamtlandic dialect. It's not a dialect, it's a group of dialects. Either redirect the article to Jamtlandic or to Jamtlandic dialects, please. / JiPe ( 193.10.117.142 (talk) 19:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC) )

England and Germany football rivalry

You told me "The recent edit that you made to the page England and Germany football rivalry has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive."

However, I have never even visited that page before, let alone edited it. In fact, I didn't even know England and Germany had a football rivalry. Could this be a simple error on your part, or maybe someone using my IP address?

Thanks. 112.118.190.141 (talk) 14:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Bye

Dffgd has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Bye!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of dffgd at 20:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC).

portobello high school

keeps getting hit on notable alumni. I just removed Anderson because he was reverted to 'out' anyway and restored those names I researched. They were all verified via references (school page news articles etc). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarzanlordofthejungle (talk • contribs) 22:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Regarding your AIV report

Jckrgn600's behavior does not constitute vandalism. On the contrary, they are merely piping links so as to bypass redirects. There's nothing wrong with that. Please read WP:PIPE.--Atlan (talk) 12:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Also,

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard#User:Jamesooders regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Atlan (talk) 12:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I fixed the link for you. Cheers, --Atlan (talk) 12:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard and Administrator intervention against vandalism reports

I have seen your comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, and it is clear that you accept that you made a mistake. That is fine. However, for future reference, it would have helped if you had also removed your report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, as it would have saved me the time I spent checking the user's edits before I discovered that you had, in effect, withdrawn your claim of vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

No Problem, thanks for providing me with the information to resolve future issues, it all helps, I also thankyou for your time performing the backround check, Thanks :D James'ööders 13:08, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Chilton, County Durham

Hello I'm just wondering about your last edit to Chilton, County Durham since you reverted vandalism by another user but then undid your own edit. I'm guessing it was just a mistake though and I've removed the offending material from the page again. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your involvement with DRN

Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Buswell... was?

Why? Where does it say he's resigning from parliament? "He’ll remain the MP for Vasse". I've made corrections. Timeshift (talk) 05:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Did not edit "Personal Computer Hardware"

Hi, i'm Kuyapo. I was surprised to be notified by you that I had edited the article on "personal Computer Hardware" and that you had reverted the edit as it was "unconstructive". Truth be told, i do not remember even opening that page, much less doing any edit on it. Am just a regular wikipedia user/reader and not a wikipedia contributor/editor (yet). I do not even know my own IP address (the note said it is 112.198.64.6), so there must be some mistake somewhere, as other users like you likewise have accused me of tampering with their wikipedia articles. Nice to meet you all anyway, despite all your polite accusations. Kuyapo (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

DRN needs assistance

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Help needed at DRN

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DRN help needed and volunteer roll call

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)