Warning

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mughal emperors, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Agra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Timur, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jodha Akbar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 21:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply