Jakegaming7788

hello i would love it if anyone would like to talk about my/your edits on wiki ^^ Jakegaming7788 (talk) 18:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm JurassicClassic767. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tyrannosaurus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 18:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Jakegaming7788, the problem isn't that we think your information is wrong; the problem is that new information of this kind needs inline citations to supporting reliable sources, for verifiability. Otherwise anyone could post anything on Wikipedia (and, believe me, some people try to.) I tracked down your source on deinosuchus bite force and put the necessary inline citation on this information, but you really need to do this yourself. Google Scholar can be a real help here; it helped me find your cite, and then I was able to use the DOI of the article to generate the inline citation. There are help pages at Wikipedia --JurassicClassic767 gave you links to some -- that explain how to do this. I'll leave it to you to practice this by placing an inline cite for the information that it was primarily juveniles being preyed on. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok thank you kent i will reasearch this some more and try to do this from now on thank you for bringing this to my attention (talk) 18:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:BIRDS

Hi, and welcome to the Birds WikiProject! As you've probably guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of bird-related topics.

A few features that you may find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, outreach, and other tasks.
• If you're looking for something to work on, we have a giant cleanup list and there are many articles that need attention.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any experienced member of the project; we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! MeegsC (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Slow down

Alright :/

Welcome!

Hello, Jakegaming7788, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Status

Jake, please STOP adding a status to the magpie article. That article is about many magpie species. A single status will never be correct for all of them. The status is at each species' article, which is appropriate. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. MeegsC (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Same for kingfisher, and pheasant, and any other general article about a group of species. In fact, can you please go back and remove the status from all such articles that you've added them to? MeegsC (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

yeah sure sorry about that. Jakegaming7788 (talk) 17:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Actually, I've noticed you've been doing this for quite a few different animal groupings. IUCN Red List conservation status is only at the species level, and not for groups of species. Cougroyalty (talk) 17:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

oh ok thank you for telling me i will make sure only to add it to single species now Jakegaming7788 (talk) 17:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jakegaming7788/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jakegaming7788/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Jakegaming7788! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jakegaming7788/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jakegaming7788/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

WP:IDHT

Jake, go and read Wikipedia:Consensus. You are the only person who thinks that these articles should exist, while 5 people think that they shouldn't. I'm sorry for getting angry with you, but you seem not to care that the majority of editors disagree with you. If you continue to ignore consensus I will take you to WP:ANI. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

ok maybe it is edit waring seeing as two people are saying this now sorry for that :/ could we have the redirect but then have a basic article underneath the redirect just if anyone wants to look at it, so it will redirect it to the main article but if anyone clicks to go on carchnae or gigani then they can have a look? Jakegaming7788 (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

there's a discussion going on on the topic at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dinosaurs/Archive 34#Carcharodontosaurinae and Giganotosaurini if you'd like to join in   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  15:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for being mean :(. If you want to discuss them then Carcharodontosauridae is the place to do it. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

ok thank you dont worry about it :) Jakegaming7788 (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

be careful

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.Thedefender35 17:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Citations

Citations are massively easy with the WP:VisualEditor, all you have to do is press the cite button, paste in the url or doi and it will automatically generate a citation. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ceratosaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxfordian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Jakegaming7788/sandbox

Hello, Jakegaming7788. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Jakegaming7788/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)