JAF3993

Hello, I'm JAF3993!

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, JAF3993, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 19:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Admin

Thank you for your warm welcome! I see Wikipedia is a freindly and community is a strong point. I recently requested for a rollback and administratorship. {{helpme}} Please can this be granted? I am a worker who helps fight cyber vandalism and bullying and have signed up to the CVU. Also, I strongly approve of Wikipedia and would like to assist it in any way, shape or form! Can you grant these please (rollback and admin!)? {{helpme}} Thanks a lot, JAF3993

It doesn't work that way. You have less than 20 edits! None have to do with reverting vandalism. You obviously have no experience (your RfA didn't even transclude) and people have to vote (if they even find it!). Who is User:JAF3? It all smells very fishy to me.  fetchcomms☛ 20:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict - i.e., I was writing this at the same time as Fetchcomms) The place to apply for rollback is WP:RFR, but before granting it an admin will want to see evidence of considerable experience in vandalism reversion, so as to be sure that you will understand when and when not to use it. For becoming an admin, see WP:Guide to requests for adminship and read it carefully; also look at some WP:RFAs to see what the process is like, particularly some unsuccesful ones from this list; once again, the community will want to see considerable experience before approving you for adminship. There are no formal minimum standards, but it is rare for a new admin to be appointed with less than six months' experience and 3,000 edits. My advice would be to concentrate on finding useful things to do and gain Wikipedia experience, and forget about rollback for at least two or three weeks and adminship for several months. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

It would be a very large COI for him to vote. I'm still not very sure about your story anyhow. Either way, you have no chance whatsoever, honestly speaking. I think it would be prudent for you to get some experience around here (you don't know how to use a tb template either!) and ask your "coworker" to get a new account.  fetchcomms☛ 20:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Hm, so you just tell each other your "work pass" numbers? Regardless, listen to what JohnCD had to say.  fetchcomms☛ 20:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

immediate assistance needed! {{helpme}}

Please ask a question, and no, we will not give you rollback or adminship. Also, use one template only.  fetchcomms☛ 20:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

fetchcomms

{{helpme}} How do I stop fetchcomms bullying me?

It's hard to believe that Fetchcomms is bullying you, but if he really does, I think it would be best to ask him to stop bullying. Please use helpme-template if you need advice on wikipedia-related problems, not to ask how to stop someone from bullying you.  Ilyushka88 Talk to me 12:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, JAF3993. You have new messages at Ilyushka88's talk page.
Message added 13:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Ilyushka88 Talk to me 13:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Helpme

{{helpme}} Can you create me a swanky, cool, show-off user page?

Hello JAF3993, you may like to have a look at the user page design center. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 16:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Bullying

Ilyushka88 is very correct. You have to realize that after a while, there are some "warning signs" of a sort, which makes me a little more careful. For example, it was very unusual for me to see our requests on your page, for your friend to have a similar username, or for you to put multiple help tags on one page at once. I may have overreacted, but shouting "SHUT UP" on my talk page is incorrect as well. I apologize for this incident, and hope that you will as well. However, I would ask that you please not rush to accuse me (Kate told me that two wrongs don't make a right, something we both should pay more attention to). Also, to prevent these things from happening again, I would ask that you please familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. Sometimes it really is quite frustrating after a while. Again, sorry.  fetchcomms☛ 19:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

This user scored 500,000 on the Wikipediholic test (revision 331149303).

)

This user scored 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 on the Wikipediholic test (revision 331149303).

)

Warning

Please stop behaving inappropriately, otherwise you risk being blocked. Please do not make outlandish attacks and do not misuse the helpme template. Killiondude (talk) 19:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikkiterrorist Test

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikkiterrorist Test, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikkiterrorist Test

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikkiterrorist Test, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)