Itassolutions

{{unblock-spamun|Hlin87|is this an acceptable username? third time lucky!}}

{{unblock-spamun|Hlin|is this an acceptable username? I have checked availability}}

That is the same name as the below request. If it shows up in the "account availability check" it is already taken. (The availability check queries for all currently-registered users with that name.) —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Itassolutions (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

hlin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hi apologies if I have breached the rules, I based it on the example user pages that you guys had for a person. Will remove all the information and have a blank user page. We are hoping to contribute to articles on technology based topics as I spend a lot of time reading wiki article so I was hoping to be able to give something back. Again apologies if I have broken the rules. Will make sure it doesn't happen again

Decline reason:

Accounts are not to be used by multiple persons. As you've indicated above that "we" will be editing with this account, I am denying your request to be unblocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:30, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

That username is taken. (Note that all usernames on Wikipedia begin with an uppercase letter due to technical limitations.) —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Itassolutions (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

itas (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hi apologies if I have breached the rules, I based it on the example user pages that you guys had for a person. Will remove all the information and have a blank user page. We are hoping to contribute to articles on technology based topics as I spend a lot of time reading wiki article so I was hoping to be able to give something back. Again apologies if I have broken the rules. Will make sure it doesn't happen again

Decline reason:

I agree with Jeremy - the proposed username isn't a significant improvement. PhilKnight (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

The suggested username is not acceptable; we need a username that doesn't imply it is being used by a company or group. ("<name> at <company>" and variants thereof are acceptable; see WP:Username policy#Promotional names.) —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Itassolutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gparyani (talk) 19:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Itassolutions (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC) We have won awards from sage (do i need to cite them)

we do specialise in sage 200 and sage CRM

those are our stated vision and mission - am I not allowed to mention them here?

March 2015

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

• Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
• Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
• Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 22:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sage 200 Business Management Software (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sage 200 Business Management Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Itassolutions, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 00:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sage 200 Business Management Software

Hello, Itassolutions. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sage 200 Business Management Software".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)