Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1292simon (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Improving "Underneath A Harlem Moon"

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw on the books WikiProject that your article Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon had been declined, but I think this could be an excellent article. Based on the notability guidelines for books, a book is independently notable is it "has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself." The Guardian article is definitely one such work, and it looks like there have been several reviews in other sources which could be the second, though I haven't been able to access those. Organizing the article around the book itself, and saying more about it as a book, can help make this notability clearer so the article will be accepted next time. I started some edits along that line but won't be able to finish them. I encourage you to continue working on the article, and would be happy to help if I can. You might find it useful to look at other biography articles like Daughters of the Samurai or The Black Count to think about what information to include. Good luck editing, and let me know if I can assist! ~ oulfis 🌸(talk) 20:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Underneath a Harlem Moon (January 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tom (LT) (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Interestingfax! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tom (LT) (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon

edit

  Hello, Interestingfax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon

edit
 

Hello, Interestingfax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Underneath a Harlem Moon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

  Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Resentment (Victoria Beckham song), without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, there are messages for you

edit

Hi. Can you see your talk page? Please do not use technical moves for controversial RM proposals like this. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Evidently not In ictu oculi (talk) 09:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Emma Rosen

edit

Hi - I'm Girth Summit, an administrator here. I noticed that you added a couple of self-published books by Emma Rosen to 'further reading' sections of a few articles. Can I ask whether you have any connection to that author? If so, please review our guidance on editing with a conflict of interest - there are certain disclosure that you may need to make. I've removed the additions you made, because to me they didn't see necessary - what we don't want to do is turn our articles into massive lists of all of the pieces of literature on a particular subject, and these books didn't seem to me to stand out from the crowd of other similar works. Best Girth Summit (blether) 09:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour. Interestingfax (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Making points

edit

Whatever WP:POINT you are trying to make, being disruptive is not a good way to go about it. MrOllie (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is a very good way to get blocked. Is that what you're after? - MrOllie (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour. Interestingfax (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour. Interestingfax (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour. Interestingfax (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit

April 2022

edit

Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour.





 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.