Hello, Incognipedia, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 16:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 09:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Incognipedia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 09:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notes

edit

I've gone through and cleaned the draft and added some sourcing. I'm left kind of unsure of notability and more than a little irritated. It's one of those situations where I'd personally consider it to be notable. The first review is good and the tweet by the PM did get coverage, so that could potentially be considered enough. However because of the brevity of the tweet and the general lack of coverage as a whole, it's light enough to where I'm concerned that it could be challenged if I were to approve it. I think that it would be good to bring in a second person to review it. I'm going to tag someone whose opinion I trust when it comes to borderline cases. (@DGG:) DGG, I'm really torn on this one per what I wrote above. If you think that this could survive being live, then I have no problem with this being moved. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 09:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • OK, left him a note on his talk page as well. If DGG doesn't think that this is viable then unfortunately there's not much else that can be done. I added all of the sourcing I could discover and unless there's more in another language, the only thing that can be done is to wait and see if more sourcing becomes available over time or if the author were to be notable. The more time that passes after a book's release, the less likely that coverage will become available, however it's possible that the May 2020 tweet may end up resulting in some additional interest - although of course, the further time gets from that point, the less likely that will be.
Now what I will say is that if he's the same person who created the Barack Obama "Joker" poster, then it may be worth looking into whether there's more coverage out there for him as an individual. There may be enough to argue for him to be notable per WP:NBIO. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 09:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


 
  • No problem! One note though - when you respond on a talk page, make sure that you sign using four tildes (~~~~) You can also sign using the toolbar above the editing area - the button for signing will look like an x followed by a scribble/signature and will come right after the bold and icon buttons. It just lets us know that it's you when you post. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 10:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Here you go :) Incognipedia (talk) 11:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past has been accepted

edit
 
Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fredrik Alexandersson (August 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Fredrik Alexandersson

edit

  Hello, Incognipedia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fredrik Alexandersson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply