User talk:Ilenart626/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ilenart626. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Welcome!
Talkback Shark attack prevention
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Allenmt92 (talk), 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Talkback Shark attack prevention
Message added 10:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Allenmt92 (talk) 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Ilenart626! Thank you for your contributions. I am Clubjustin and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Clubjustin Talkosphere 09:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Shark attack prevention page
Looks great - thank you for putting it together! Let's get it live :) Clare. (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shark attack prevention (January 6)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shark attack prevention and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Ilenart626,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TimothyJosephWood 20:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
|
Shark attack prevention
Well done on your first article going live! Clare. (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello Ilenart626!
Thx for your comments on my edits, Preventing shark attacks. I will go through your suggestions. Am a new user also. Need to learn more before I embark on making new page. I perceive you are author of Preventing shark attack. I expect to be making some elaborations. I think Preventing... section would not be hurt by a few more scattered comments about the debate over culling. A new page can come later. (Expect a mentor might comment on this.) Happy to discuss issue via email also, if you are so inclined (markdd8@gmail.com). AlohaMarkDougherty (talk) 06:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Sincerely Mark DoughertyMarkDougherty (talk) 06:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia campaign update
I'm writing you this followup message, as you took the time to vote in support of a Wikipedia banner campaign for the introduction of Fair Use in Australia.
After much planning and coordination with the WMF, Australian Digital Alliance, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, as of Monday the banner-campaign is active on English Wikipedia to a portion of logged-out readers in Australia (technical details). The banners direct people to this page on Meta: FairCopyrightOz. That page, alongside lots of information, further directs people towards the campaign website faircopyright.org.au where Australians are invited to write to their local MP to express support of Fair Use. If you are interested in supporting this campaign, please, send a letter yourself using the template letter provided at that link.
Furthermore, and with the support of the ADA & EFA, we have received fantastic media coverage - with article "Fair Use: Wikipedia targets Australians in bid to change the law" appearing on page 2 of the Sydney Morning Herald and page 10 of the Melbourne Age on Monday's edition. It was for a time the 3rd most read article the Fairfax website, and Fair Use was "trending" on Twitter in Australia. We are running the account @FairCopyrightOz on twitter, and we are tracking other press-mentions on the talkpage on Meta.
Today, day 2, we published a detailed post about the campaign on the Wikimedia Blog, ran an "Ask Me Anything" Q&A session on the Australia page in Reddit, and [by happy coincidence of timing] the article History of fair use proposals in Australia appeared on the en.wp mainpage as a Did You Know. [The creation of that "history of..." article was a specific request arising from in the community consultation in which you voted].
And, most importantly, in a little more than a day nearly 800 letters to MPs have been sent encouraging them to support the Productivity Commission's recommendation to adopt Fair Use in Australia. I urge you - please add your own message.
Sincerely, Wittylama 16:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Ilenart626. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A Dobos torte for you!
.jpg)
|
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Shark attack prevention into Shark culling. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:50, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Dianna, can you note that the Shark Culling page was mainly created from copying "the negative" view from from the Shark attack prevention page, plus other related articles. My edits were copying "the supporting" view, to provide balance to the Shark Culling page. Note that the Shark culling page was only recently created and as it duplicates the Shark attack prevention page my personal view is that it is not neccessary.
Also note that I am the creator and major contributor to the Shar attack prevention page, so not sure how that impacts your last point Ilenart626 (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Ilenart626. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallberg-Rassy 40
Hi @Ilenart626:, Most awards are non-notable. To be included in an article, there has to be Wikipedia article present which makes it notable. Many award get read and subsequently deleted. Check if an article exists. Take them out.scope_creepTalk 22:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
1998 Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race
Discussion transferred to the talk page of the 1998 Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Wikidata project Sailing
Hi. As you are active on WP:SAIL, I wanted to draw your attention to Wikidata project Sailing. Best, simon (talk) 02:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Reverted changes to Ocean Gardian and related Shark articles
Hi llenart626, thank you for your message below. I don't believe any negative information was removed related to Ocean Guardian in these edits or promotional material added. The additions and edits related directly to the company's announcement of an electrical shark barrier, added to the company's page and shark barrier page, and the other edits based on published research related to the technology efficacy which was added to the relative sections in the company and shark attack prevention. All factual supportive data references to additions and edits where provided. The only historical negative information edit I have made was a fictitious refence to people dying wearing Ocean Guardian devices, and to resolve this I added a new section that detailed the factual reference details of shark attacks related to shark shield technology. I do not have a conflict, and the information I'm providing to support readers knowledge is not promoting material, it is factual supported data. I'd argue the other way, that their are parties attempting to discredit their safety technology which a growing body of research clearly supports saves lives. Please review again the edits made in light of the above to reinstate, Thanks.
Arkpro I have reverted all your edits you made today to Ocean Guardian (Shark Shield), Shark barrier and Shark attack prevention. All your edits appear to be promoting Ocean Guardian related products and deleting information that is negative to Ocean Guardian. I also note that you have previously been requested to advise any conflict of interest on your Talk page and you have failed to do so. I am concerned that you have a conflict of interest as per WP:Conflict. Happy to discuss. Ilenart626 (talk) 10:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
DS notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.