Ignisstatera, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Ignisstatera! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Carthen (January 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir Joseph was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sir Joseph (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Ignisstatera, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sir Joseph (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Carthen (January 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Carthen (February 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Carthen (February 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 04:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Carthen (February 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Carthen (February 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Andre Carthen

edit
 

Hello, Ignisstatera. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Andre Carthen".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 13:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:GoTRG

edit

Hi. You need to do some more work on this to bring it up to standard. There's no clear statement of notability and no categories have been added. It reads rather like an advertisement. Also, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, just to be on the safe side. Feel free to submit it for review when you have made some improvements. Deb (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:GoTRG

edit
 

Hello, Ignisstatera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GoTRG".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply