January 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Vacant0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Socialist Party of Serbia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 00:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at National Revolutionary Movement for Development, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Coalition for the Defence of the Republic, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at History of Russia (1991–present)‎. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Democratic Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burmese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 02:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Va por México, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at GroenLinks–PvdA. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I noticed that in this edit to M62 Movement, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Bulgarian Agrarian National Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Somali National Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Reconciliation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Radical pro-Beijing camp for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radical pro-Beijing camp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical pro-Beijing camp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Simonm223 (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rise Mzansi, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 04:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply