User talk:Happysailor/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 14

Sorry

very sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.96.162 (talk) 09:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

np - Happysailor ^(Talk) 08:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Lepine edit

I spotted 4 reference links in that page that all pointed to the same site , they weren't unique and appear to just be plants to that watch selling website ?

I haven't got time (or the skills) to edit it , just pointing it out for someone else to remove , they don't add to the page/content at all in anyway whatsoever — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.198.34.95 (talk) 08:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

if you spot something that needs changing/correcting, and you don't want to do it yourself, then leave a message on the page's talk page, not by leaving random words on the page - Happysailor ^(Talk) 08:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

What

What's your name dear Happysailor????????????????????

--ElekKiss (talk) 08:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Happaysailor, what's your name, Thank,--ElekKiss (talk) 08:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

I would advise you concentrate more on not creating fictitious pages and causing vandalism than worrying about what my name is. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 08:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Happysailor, I've blocked him as a sock of a known vandal.  —SMALLJIM  09:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

And

WHAT'S YOUR NAME??????????????????????????????????????? --ElekKiss (talk) 08:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

What

What's the matter with John Bry-Soul???? Thank,--ElekKiss (talk) 08:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

HallllllllOOOO

I'm Elek Kiss, I'm from Hungary. I' m speak Hungary. Do you speak Hungary? Do you write Hungary? --ElekKiss (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

lepine edit

Instead of you telling me where to edit, why don't YOU just click the appropriate button and pass the info on

I just tried to help where I saw a problem , seems you'd rather send messages telling people how to do this

Last time I'll be offering a contribution , the page can stay how it is for all I care — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.198.34.95 (talk) 09:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

It's unfortunate you feel that way, but your edit left text not relevent to the article on the page. I corrected that, and informed you of the correct way to do what you want to do (which is apparently not to edit Wikipedia, but to tell others what to do...). In the time it's taken you to do your original edit, and type to me, you could have fixed the article yourself. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 09:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Electric Skateboards

Thanks for the information about the edit summary. I am only new to this and I found them very useful. Re Electric Skateboard: In my edits I removed a lot of "puff" from Zboards on the post. If you read it (you have reintstated it) you will see that the second half of the history post is simply an advertisement for Zboards. My edits made it more balanced. I suggest you reinstate the edits. Llahllahsram (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llahllahsram (talk • contribs) 08:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Eurovision

Hi, I have nominated Måns win at Eurovision for a mention at ITN. Take a look. Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

umm, huh? - Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

10:47:06, 24 May 2015 review of submission by 58.110.42.251

• 58.110.42.251 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ryan Chiong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Ryan Chiong was more than a legend in his own lunchbox, and what a great man he was. He died prematurely, and we want a way to honour our friend. He was a legend at Tennis and Rugby, a well known tennis student of Gus at his tennis place in Brisbane. Please allow this page in remberance of our friend.

58.110.42.251 (talk) 10:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

All entries to Wikipedia need have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. Unfortunately, your draft doesn't currently show how Ryan Choing is notable. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:00, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Comlife Investments

This page is being vandalised by users and I don't have the time to keep coming back here to rectify it. Please delete it. Thanks! JoannaG20 (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

It is not your job to keep coming back here to rectify anything. The article is not yours but is part of Wikipedia. Here is a quote from the linked policy:

No one, no matter how skilled, or of how high standing in the community, has the right to act as though he or she is the owner of a particular page. Also, a person or an organisation which is the subject of an article does not own the article, and has no right to dictate what the article may say.

If you feel there is an issue with the article in question, then as you have a conflict of interest, I would advise you to write on the talk page expressing your views. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 16:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Comlife Investments- removal of the article

I m not familiar with wikipedia myself and I m not fluent on how to edit or remove inappropriate content.

The reason why I want Comlife Investments article to be deleted is because my life is under a serious threat. I m currently prosecuting couple of people for criminal defamation, IP Fraud and attempted murder.Two weeks ago one of the prosecuted people, who is also responsible for criminal defamation has tried to kill me or to do serious damage to my body by cutting the rear break in my motorbike. What I m dealing with right now is hard to believe. I have to protect myself. I m more than happy to provide you with the details of the cases to prove how serious the matter is. Please help me.... JoannaG20 (talk) 16:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Dear

Hi Joanna. The article is currently under discussion for deletion. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Vimala Britto

Hello Happysailor. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Vimala Britto, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Tagged seven minutes after creation, with no message on the creator's talk page. The article isn't a great start but that's too soon. Thank you. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Huh? You posted here saying you didn't delete it, but you did delete it... ??? - Happysailor ^(Talk) 06:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I made a mistake using a script to deliver the message. There was nothing worth preserving in this article, but please do wait a bit longer before tagging, and remember to notify the author; it's common for new users to start by making an outline with just headers, and fill in the text in a subsequent edit. Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

No worries. Strange that it didn't tag the users talk page, as TW/HG usually do that automaticaly - I'll keep an eye on it. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 08:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

I have been informed that the page Hero ltd that was created by me few minutes ago is tagged by you for speedy deletion. This page is based on real facts and figures kindly provide the details of issue that is raised by you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinezisra (talk • contribs) 07:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

The reason for the deletion tag are stated in both the tag on the page, and in the message left on your talk page. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 08:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bedein#Camp_Jihad

Hello! Please forgive my excluding an explanation for the edit I made for the section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bedein#Camp_Jihad I am still getting used to wiki guidelines. I deleted the lengthy comments since they have already been mentioned in the section "Research and media presence" and are referenced in reference #13, with this line "UNRWA released an official rejection of these claims,[13] claiming the summer camp shown, and the people involved are not affiliated with UNRWA." And Since Camp Jihad is 2 years old and The Center for Near East Policy Research has released two films since then, I will remove the section entitled 'Camp Jihad' and replace it with a general list of all of our films.DeeDee23Jerusalem (talk) 10:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

In regards to the section I added to this page and then was removed by DeeDee23Jerusalem, it seems a little odd to me that someone affiliated with this individual, as indicated by her note "replace it with a general list of all of our films," would remove content that calls into question the veracity of the materials presented in the films. Perhaps a breakdown of the content of each of the films and their veracity would be a more accurate way to address this? Removing content because you do not agree with it is unwelcome.Q234567 (talk) 27 May 2015 — Preceding undated comment added 19:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Oakley page

The problem is that oakley never owned REVO, revo was originally owned by bausch and lomb and later purchased by luxxotica group becoming one of that companys house brands. Oakley was an independant company that was later also bought by luxxotica group. So my edit actually was constructive in correcting misinformation. Now I'll change it back. I have owned many pairs of revo's and oakleys over the years and am well aware of the companys historys.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.37.197.75 (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

As you can see, it was reverted again by another editor. I've looked into this, and Oakley did sell the rights to Sequential, and I have added another reference (a press release FROM Sequential Brands Group) to corroborate this fact. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 19:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Yep and oakley is OWNED by luxottica but I guess you just can't change stupid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.37.197.75 (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Just because Oakley is owned by another company, does not mean that it was Luxottica that sold the rights. Have you even read the press release where Sequential Brands Group state they bought the rights from oakley? - Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

The CSD template on Linda Sultanpuria

I just noticed this page while patrolling recent changes and noticed that you marked it G1. It's not quite "patent nonsense"—the text appears to be mostly in Hindi (or a closely related language, like Punjabi), written in romanization, as many Indian users tend to write. I can't understand most of what it says, but judging by the title, it likely falls under A7 too, so it should probably be deleted either way.  dalahäst ^{(let's talk!)} 06:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

hey. I tried a couple of translation programs, and none of them could decipher the contents thus the G1 tag. I agree A7 most likely applies too though :) - Happysailor ^(Talk) 06:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, Google Translate and the like expect languages written in their proper scripts (so Devanagari or Gurmukhi in this case). If you paste in a romanization like this, it doesn't see any Hindi words and doesn't know what to do with it. Google Translate does allow you to input romanization, though, so for short texts you can retype it into the box and it'll try to guess what the correct conversion to the native script is.  dalahäst ^{(let's talk!)} 06:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for helping me to make Wikipedia better. Raginidutta (talk) 07:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

No inflation risk - large edit

No bank anywhere loans out reserves. Bank loans create deposits and banks will lend to any creditworthy customer. Hence there is no extra inflationary risk with platinum coin seigniorage http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q1.aspx If you view this video from the Bank of England (and/or read the paper) you will see why. Thank you. 86.161.4.141 (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

You cannot fix things by deleting a large amount of sourced material without any comment whatsoever. if you think it's wrong, take it to the article's talk page - Happysailor ^(Talk) 09:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

the boy in the striped pyjamas

can you please erase the plot from the boy in the striped pyjamas? it is for a work i need to do and my teacher checks it, so can you please erase it? i will put it again, just for the week, i swear i will put it myself thanks, with sorry Debany. make consideration please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.138.105.68 (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Um, no. That is not what Wikipedia is here for. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 21:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

fictional imperium

its about a fictional imperium that rules earth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph crhistopher pena (talk • contribs) 22:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

umm, ok? - Happysailor ^(Talk) 09:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

You removed my files from wikimedia thanks from this act of yours i take knowledge that don't put copyright material in wikimedia. Wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raginidutta (talk • contribs) 07:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

About my contribution to the Disney-ABC Television Group article...

My reasoning for putting the "citation needed" template where I did was to get the user who put the information relating to said template to correct the mistake they made by leaving out the title of whatever articles they were referencing. I honestly wasn't sure how else to address that error. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 12:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

The problem, is that template is used to state that a statement needs a reference/citation in order to verify it. Which is not what you were using it for. If a reference isn't complete, then you can either fix it using WP:reFill, or tag the whole article with {{Full citation needed}} - Happysailor ^(Talk) 16:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, I figured the entire article doesn't need tagging, just the sources mentioned in the particular reference. However, I can't seem to figure out how to use the reFill option. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, I decided to try reFill to see if it could fix the #30 reference. As far as I can tell, it didn't, so I'll go with Plan B: your advice of tagging the whole article by placing the template you referenced at the end of the reference. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism Message on Wikipedia page "Bolton Wanderers FC"

Hi, I recently recieved a message from you regarding my edit on the "Bolton Wanderers FC" wikipedia page: I edited "Wanderers" to "Thundertruffles" under the headline 'club name' and thus recieved this message. Could you please state to me why my edit was changed? Kind Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.8.101 (talk) 16:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your edit was reverted because it was unconstructive and was both introducing a factual error to the page, and included an unexplained removal of content - Happysailor ^(Talk) 16:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

ok

ok ty sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.177.193 (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

students welfare society

as i am new to wikipedia,and =students welfare society= ,the page i created had many mistakes.but that was my first experience and i assure that is this page is note for publicity.the ownerof this =students welfare society=, does not have any issues with my this page.i will remove my errors in 2 days,by asking help from different people.kindly do not delete this page.that is my 1st experience — Preceding unsigned comment added by STARZ545 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Articles must be notable and verifiable. See WP:42 - Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

mh370

what are ya doing man????? DEEZ NUTS! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cchsdugman (talk • contribs) 18:49, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

BLP issue

Hi, I've removed some text from this page that was a violation of the policy on biographies of living persons. It was all stuff added by third parties - this is just an FYI. Happy to discuss if required. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

No worries. I was responding to it and edit conflicted with you when you removed it :) - Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Chelsea Charms

Hi,

Just wondering why you completely wiped out my updates to Chelsea Charms wiki page?

I referenced facts from her actual website along with her twitter page, her facebook and her youtube.

I tried to put the sources on there including one that was ALREADY on there, but had difficulty actually posting them to that area. Not sure why.

Please restore the edits.

Thanks for your attention and assistance.

bigjuggsfanxxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigjuggsfanxxx (talk • contribs) 14:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I haven't reverted any of your edits. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 15:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back.

I'm puzzled by the answer.

Why didn't you restore the updated facts I provided to the page? Some of the sources I used were already on the wiki page. Others I listed in my response to you.

According to the info. it was you that removed the updated facts. Is it not you? If not, who do I contact?

Thanks.

Bigjuggsfanxxx (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)bigjugsfanxxx

I suggest you take a look at the history section of the page, where it states the following:

(cur | prev) 02:50, 11 May 2015‎ Dismas (talk · contribs) . . (3,802 bytes) (-531)‎ . . (Reverted good faith edits by Bigjuggsfanxxx (talk): No sources, promotional language, etc. ) (undo | thank)

Therefore, I suggest you either take on board the reason for your edits being reverted, or ask Dismas for further comment. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Free Your Mind

You have an error on the page dedicated to the En Vogue song, Free Your Mind, and the Rest Will Follow. The Funkadelic Song that inspired it, is titled; Free Your Mind, And Your Ass Will Follow, from the album of the same name. Without using the correct name, the article doesn't link to the page for the Funkadelic song, which in my opinion, is a significant flaw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.6.38.152 (talk) 20:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Removed the delete tag - why?

The delete tag was removed from the page. The delete tag write up says the page needs to be improved (or a bunch of other requirements) before the tag can be removed. The deletion was being discussed when the other person jumped the gun and just removed the delete tag without making any improvements to the page.

I did not re-add the tag. I undid this error. Please can you restore the tag. Drowz0r (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

You have nominated the article for deletion via WP:PROD. An editor can object to the deletion by removing the tag for any reason. The text actually says: You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason.

If you feel the article should be deleted. Take it to WP:AFD as you have now been advised twice. Re-adding the PROD tag will be reverted. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 00:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Didn't realise undoing edits were the same as re-adding tags. In future could you advise "undoing" edits is the same as re-adding tags from those undone edits as you have now been advised twice Drowz0r (talk) 01:33, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Look I'm Sorry OK put I need to find out how are Characters are The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail and Secrets at Sea and Plot.

But I'm Sorry about What happen I put Characters and Plot. Would you ever forgive me like I'm Sorry what I put the Characters and Plot.

But Still need to find Out who are Characters and Plot I just have to wait for days I been?

Could find soon how are Characters are The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail and Secrets at Sea and Plot.––90731fly (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say? but if you continue to remove valid WP:AFD templates from pages, you may be blocked from editing without further warning - Happysailor ^(Talk) 05:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Tagging of Tryon Street

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Tryon Street. I do not think that Tryon Street fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because This is not a proper db-move, as it would move the entire Charlotte center city article to Tryon Street, surfely not a desired outcome. I request that you consider not re-tagging Tryon Street for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. If there is deleted history that should be restored, that can be done without a move (probably). However, i looked at the deelted haitory and didn't see anything of obvious value. Please describe what you think needs to be restored and why, as best as you can, and ping or otherwise notify me (or use {{helpme}} to attract any admin). Thank you. DES ^(talk) 17:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

@DESiegel: Did you actually look at what was requested, or just skim the surface of the request? The move wouldn't have moved the Charlotte center city article at all, it would have reverted the page move from Tryon Street to Charlotte Center City (Note the capitalisation). This deletion was already granted once, but before the move was reverted, Tryon Street was recreated as a redirect, and double edited to prevent a move. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes I followed the links and looked at the histories and deleted histories. It is possible that I made an error however. I may have looked at the wrong history because of thw capitolization. I take it that you are content to have both Tryon Street and Charlotte Center City redirect to Charlotte center city, but ant the more extensive history now behind Charlotte Center City to be behind Tryon Street instead? If that is corect, i will do the delete and move (actually a bit more complex than the auto link would have done, as I would want to keep the curnt revision on each page in place, merely moving the older revisions. Have I understood you correctly? DES ^(talk) 18:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

@DESiegel: Basically, yes, that's pretty much it (sry for my snippiness). No argument about them staying redirects, but the history on Charlotte Center City should go back to Tryon Street where it belongs. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

About STAR Utsav

Hello Happysailor, You made many Mistake in STAR Utsav First... The launch date is wrong....!

Slogan Written in Hindi but This slogan is of STAR Plus not STAR Utsav

second.... website wrong ....!

Satellite Availability has some wrong information...!

3rd.... Programming section is empty....!

&

No any Reference....!

Please Watch This Page for more Info

I hope, you will undo edit....Please because the information is correct that you Removed....!!!! ¶¶ Sunil Malethiya (Talk) 02:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

I haven't edited that page... - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

.451 Detonics?

What is incorrect about including the .451 Detonics in the list of .45 ACP variants? - http://www.z3bigdaddy.com/site8/page44.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.234.144.41 (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Also, why shouldn't the .45 Super, .450 SMC and .460 Rowland be listed in the related cartridges list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.234.144.41 (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

See also http://tincanbandit.blogspot.com/2014/10/cartridge-interchangeability.html which lists the following cartridges in the .45 ACP family: -- .45 ACP -- .45 Super -- .450 SMC -- .460 Rowland -- .451 Detonics Magnum -- .45 Remington-Thompson -- .45 Winchester Magnum -- .45 GAP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.234.144.41 (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Here is some more evidence of the .45 ACP cartridge family, including a 2008 notation at the bottom of the page that indicates the list should have also included the Detonics .451.

https://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=5&f=20&t=68208

Was your reversal of my .45 ACP edits due to some anti-vandalism script/robot that (wrongly) generated a false positive identification of my edits as vandalism?

Alternatively, did you have specific, factual disputes with the technical accuracy of my edits of the wiki page for .45 ACP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.234.144.41 (talk) 23:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

I have no problem with automated robot scripts to find suspected cases of vandalism and attempts to destroy the ability of Wikipedia to convey accurate and factual information. However, any pattern recognition methods to automate detection of suspected vandalism will result in both under-inclusive and over-inclusive errors (type I and type II errors). In my opinion, automated reversals should more conspicuously note that a robot script has flagged a change as possible vandalism. (HG) in the comments was not prominent enough for me to realize immediately that my editing actions had (improperly) triggered some robot script to protect against content vandalism.

If you are involved in Wikipedia maintenance and care, then please consider adjusting the notice of (HG) for Huggle or (??) for Twinkle to something else more attention grabbing. Otherwise, good faith editors/contributors may spend inordinate time trying to check their (correct) content when all the contributor did is (accidentally) trip some (imperfect) automated vandalism detection algorithms. With more prominent notice, I would not have spent as long reworking my factually correct and good faith edits.

216.234.144.41 (talk) 00:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your edit was reverted because you were adding what looked like a spammy external links to the main text of an article. external links should either be used as references or if specifically about an article, in the external links section (following WP:EXT).

Rather than impatiantly posting a large block of text to my talk page (using 14 edits...), then you could have looked at what you had edited into the article, and tried to see what the issue could have been, as neither myself, or infact most editors are here all the time.

To clarify something, the reversal was NOT a result of an automated robot or script. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

So, because the URL (http://www.z3bigdaddy.com/site8/page44.html) appears questionable, Huggle flagged the insertion and that prompted you to generate a manual reversal without viewing the content at the URL?

I searched and found a web page providing what appears to be the most thorough and accurate material on the subject of the .451 Detonics cartridge history. While the .451 Detonics is mentioned in several Wikipedia articles, there was not yet a Wikipedia article on the .451 to which I could have linked. I generally do only use external links in the references section, except in the case where there is not yet a Wikipedia page and where I am not enough of an expert to write the initial Wikipedia content page.

The notice of the reversal contained no information from which I could have inferred what was wrong with my edits to the Wikipedia page. Specifically the notice states: "I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to .45 ACP— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Happysailor" The revision notation contains even less information: "20:44, 23 June 2015‎ Happysailor (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (25,194 bytes) (-166)‎ . . (Reverted edits by 216.234.144.41 (talk) (HG)) (undo)."

I fail to see the relevance of my "large block of text" or "14 edits." My text served its purpose of accurately communicating so that you could directly answer my questions. In contrast, your "large block of text" indicating a reversal essentially conveyed no useful information, thus leading to my misunderstanding and this minor tiff. Furthermore, I followed the course of action that you recommended, namely leaving messages on your talk page. However, given the tone of your response, you obviously meant to say, "leave a short message of no more than X words and no more than Y edits."

216.234.144.41 (talk) 20:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

In fact, my 14 edits on this talk page over a couple of hours are evidence of my mental state in trying to figure out what editing change might have caused my edit to get bounced (as I later learned, first identified by Huggle and then manually reversed by you). Furthermore, I was editing this talk page to ensure my messages were as accurate as possible. In contrast, the reversal notice that you posted for the automated Huggle detection just states that my original Wiki page edit "did not appear to be constructive to you." I find it somewhat ironic that you expect users to divine your intentions from at best a generic, terse and non-explanatory message, while then reproving someone who was indeed taking the time to interpret the cryptic message and ask detailed and precise questions.

216.234.144.41 (talk) 21:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project

A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements. I notice that you reverted a copyvio https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dame_Stephanie_Shirley&diff=667084065&oldid=25347666 Good work. --Lucas559 (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your reversion to my contribution

I just thought that adding that robb is dead would be helpful to the readers. But i did not anticipate that it would spoil surprise for which the author had worked a lot. Thank You and please guide me more about wikipedia and how i can serve it better and how to get awards and ranks. btw ru a sysop? HisExcellencyAadi (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

So basically i made the page for Stay Away earlier, but it failed WP:NSONGS. At the time i didn't realize it. Today i remade it, but i'm finding where the song is including in pop culture so it passes. I just found it recently so i'm going to be fixing that and the page itself.

Sorry in advance if i put this message in the wrong place, i'm not the best at using and editing on wikipedia. Xenonkiwi111 (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Request for Clarification

Extended content

Thank you for the invitation to engage in a dialog re: the editing of the Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation page. I am fairly new to editing Wikipedia and initially created my account for the purpose of editing the page. I am a subject matter expert as a result of working for a medical device company, but am not paid to promote any product or write Wikipedia content. I discovered the page to contain misleading information and wished to correct it. Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation is a technology category that is in the public domain (all CES tech that I’m aware of is out of patent), so there are no companies or private interests that control or exclusively benefit from Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation, and those companies that do make CES devices are very small, unlike the giant pharmaceutical companies that produce competing products. Indeed, one of the obstacles that CES companies have faced is the overwhelming influence of competitors that often use well-placed, influential surrogates to disseminate misinformation about CES. Following is my assessment of content on the page that is grossly misleading: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether or not CES with alternating current is safe and effective for treating depression.[6] [6] Kavirajan HC, Lueck K, Chuang K. Alternating current cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 8;7:CD010521. Review. PMID 25000907 This extremely misleading statement is supported (in citation) by a published literature review, not a clinical trial, and the publisher of this review is a small undergraduate teaching college within the University of Bristol. In a 2010 literature review, published in a much more respected journal, Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, the conclusion is reached: “To date, whether used alone or in conjunction with pharmaceutical agents, CES has been shown to be an effective and economical therapy for mild to moderate depression.” J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2010 Nov;48(11):37-42. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20100701-01. Epub 2010 Jul 22.Cranial electrotherapy stimulation for the treatment of depression. Gunther M1, Phillips KD. More importantly, there are at least two well-controlled clinical trials that have been published in respected peer-reviewed journals that provide statistically significant evidence of CES safety and effectiveness in treating depression: Krupitsky et al. The administration of transcranial electric treatment for affective disturbances therapy in alcoholic patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 27:1-6, 1991 J Affect Disord. 2014 Aug;164:171-7. A Clinical Trial of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Anxiety and Comorbid Depression, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.029. Epub 2014 Apr 21. I attempted to add this evidence to the page, yet it was repeatedly deleted. Critics of CES research may point to the fact that subject sizes for most studies are not large when compared with drug studies, but CES study subject sizes are typical of non-invasive medical device studies. Drug studies need to be much larger because drug therapy is a chemical intervention and causes much more serious side effects. Critics may also point to the fact that CES studies examine varying patient populations and that device brands used in the studies have slight variance in electrical output. Varying patient populations are more representative of the real world, and the variance in output of different device brands is too small to skew data. The three most important aspects of studies – quality of controls, statistical significance and rigorous peer review – are soundly met in the studies listed above. In short, the Effectiveness section of this page should not be allowed to mislead the reader into thinking that there is a complete lack of evidence when in fact there is sufficient evidence Another sentence on the page which, left alone, is very misleading: The exact mechanism of action of CES is unclear.[9] 9. Rosa MA, Lisanby SH (2012). "Somatic treatments for mood disorders". Neuropsychopharmacology 37 (1): 102–16. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.225. PMC 3238088.PMID 21976043. The author of the source (Dr. Lisanby) has a documented conflict of interest with CES. Dr. Lisanby recused herself from the 2012 FDA Panel on CES Reclassification as a result of having a conflict of interest – she has financial ties to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, a competing technology. Interestingly, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation is listed in the See Also section of the Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation page, along with Trancranial Direct Current Stimulation, another competing technology. In short, Dr. Lisanby’s review is an inappropriate citation for a statement which misleads readers into thinking that the way CES works is a complete mystery. It is not a mystery. The mechanism of action of most brain related interventions, whether drug or device, are never completely clear, because the brain is so complex and imaging is only beginning to tell the whole story. But the way CES works is by no means a complete mystery. There is very strong evidence, published in respected journals, that CES stimulates the production of serotonin and other neurochemicals responsible for reducing and eliminating depression, anxiety and insomnia: Liss. S. and B. Liss. Physiological and therapeutic effects of high frequency electircal pulses. Integrative physilogical and behavioral science 31:88-94, 1996 Shealy et al. Cerebralspinal fluid and plasma neurochemicals: response to cranial electrical stimulation. J. Neurol. Orthop. Med. Surg. 18: 94-97, 1996 Shealy et al. Depression: a diagnostic, neruochemical, profile & threapy with cranial electrical stimulation. J. Neurol. Orthop. Med. Surg. 10: 319-321, 1989 2005Gilula MF, Kirsch DL. (2005). Cranial electrotherapy stimulation review: a safer alternative to psychopharmaceuticals in the treatment of depression.Journal of Neurotherapy, 9(2), 2005.doi:10.1300/J184v09n02_02 Kennerly, Richard. QEEG analysis of cranial electrotherapy: a pilot study. Journal of Neurotherapy (8)2, 2004. My efforts to provide this research have been met with repeated deletion. The page as it stands right now seems intentionally designed to make readers think that Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation is a risky, unproven technology. Not only is there sufficient evidence, but CES is prescribed by thousands of doctors, many at the top of the psychiatric field. The New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation recently approved the device for use in its 11 hospitals – including Bellevue, Jacobi and Metropolitan Hospitals. The page should reflect the scientific evidence and broad clinical support the technology has behind it. Sincerely ColumbiaLion212 ColumbiaLion212 (talk) 19:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your edit was reverted because you mass removed content from an article without using an edit summary. Please always use an edit summary as per WP:FIES in the future to avoid any misconceptions by your mass-deletion of content. Any content discussions should take place on the relevant article talk page. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 16:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)