Hello, Guglastican, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 08:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Guglastican! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 08:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Guglastican/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Guglastican/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Guglastican/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Guglastican/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 20:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Promotional editing

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. All of your editing has been promotional, whether in the form of creating pages full of fawningly glowing praise for someone (perhaps yourself) or in the form of adding promotional links to web sites to attract readers to them. JBW (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Guglastican/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Guglastican/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ublock appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guglastican (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I did not know to how fulfill well Wikipedia author page. I had to add citations, references, and internal links. Can you unblock my account? Thank you

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Guglastican (talk) 17:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I can't understand what you are trying to say or what your case is for a review of your block. Please rephrase, with reference to the guidance you were given. Deb (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guglastican (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't know how to add citations, references and internal links. I did not read that it is important to add quotes, etc. Now, I read Wikipedia guidance to create an author page. Can you unblock your account? Thank you Guglastican (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Leaving aside the issues with your edits, it appears to me that English is not your first language or you are using a computer program to write in English. I would suggest that you edit the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the premier Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guglastican (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Daniel Case, I am writing to request an appeal for my Wikipedia block. I understand that my previous actions on the platform have violated Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption I may have caused.

I recognize that Wikipedia is a community-driven platform that operates under a set of strict guidelines, and I fully respect these rules.

I make couple mistakes using Wikipedia for the first time. 1. Mistake (I did not use Cite) 2. Mistake (I use affilates links) 3. Mistake (I use external links)

I just trying to write Author page on Wikipedia :(.

I hope that you will give me the opportunity to prove that I can be a valuable contributor to the Wikipedia community.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Eldar


Guglastican (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Following the discussion below, I am not convinced you are ready to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Guglastican (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

This looks like a context-unaware ChatGPT generated appeal 2602:306:3794:C4A0:5132:CA47:8199:83A0 (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

He hasn't specified what he intends to write about either. Deb (talk) 18:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Just give me another chance to write Wikipedia page.
Thank you Guglastican (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
In order to have any hope of being unblocked, you have to tell us what you want to write about and we can then decide whether it will be allowed. Deb (talk) 14:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Google recently released a new update on April 12, 2023 and it is related to Authors. According to the new update, the content of the blog should be linked to the author's page. I chose Wikipedia because I think it has the highest authority on Google. I just want to write a biography about an author who is also a content writer. Thank you 185.50.57.154 (talk) 09:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
What are you talking about? Blogs aren't relevant to Wikipedia, and "the highest authority on Google" is meaningless and also not relevant. If you want to write about an author, s/he has to be notable and you have to follow the Wikipedia guidelines. You are clearly not yet ready to write articles as you seem unable to understand how to do this. Deb (talk) 14:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guglastican (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I just want to talk about User:Guglastican/sandbox page I created and Wikipedia team removed. Wikipedia has detect that my page is (Spam / advertising-only account) I did not use this account for I while, and know I want create only author page for my blog. I hope you understand. Guglastican (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Again, this is not convincing. Saying "know I want create only author page for my blog" does not make sense. You might be better off editing Wikipedia in your native language. PhilKnight (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Guglastican (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A request for clarification

edit

I am struggling to try to understand what you mean by most of what you have recently posted. It is very difficult to work out what you mean by your comments about Google, blogs, authors' pages, and so on. Are you trying to say that you want a Wikipedia article about yourself so that you can link to it from your blog? JBW (talk) 09:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply