July 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Breaking Bad, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for not adding the edit summary, I have hopefully rectified the issue.Guac Is Extra Delicious (talk) 11:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, Guac Is Extra Delicious, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 15:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Guac Is Extra Delicious

Thank you for creating Ashley Martinez.

User:Slywriter, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Need coverage by independent reliable sources. Improve in Draft before returning to mainspace.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slywriter (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I will work on it in the Draft space, thank you. Appreciate your help in moving it to draft, will try to work on it until the topic has more sources. Guac Is Extra Delicious (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nate Hertweck

edit
 

The article Nate Hertweck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability. One generic "interview" (a piece with preset questions, not a real interview) and that's it. Very passing mentions in GNews, nothing useful in generic Google, no attention for his career so far.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nate Hertweck for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nate Hertweck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Hertweck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. I do think that this topic has enough notability since he is cited in dozens of academic journals. Though if it does have too much issues, I will try to improve it in draft, but I think its a plenty notable subject. Guac Is Extra Delicious (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Guac Is Extra Delicious. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ashley Martinez

edit

  Hello, Guac Is Extra Delicious. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashley Martinez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ashley Martinez

edit
 

Hello, Guac Is Extra Delicious. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashley Martinez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply