invite edit

 
Hello, Gortaleen. You have new messages at Drsjpdc's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Drsjpdc (talk)Д-рСДжП,ДС 22:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Fender 51.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fender 51.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2016 edit

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. VictoriaGraysonTalk 01:42, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seosamh Ó Dálaigh (August 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
QueerEcofeminist🌈 19:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gortaleen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QueerEcofeminist🌈 19:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Patrick sugrue edit

Hello, Gortaleen

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mattdaviesfsic and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Patrick sugrue, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 2#Patrick sugrue.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mattdaviesfsic}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 04:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seán Ó Dálaigh (May 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Seosamh Ó Dálaigh edit

  Hello, Gortaleen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seosamh Ó Dálaigh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Seán Ó Dálaigh edit

  Hello, Gortaleen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seán Ó Dálaigh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Seán Ó Dálaigh edit

 

Hello, Gortaleen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seán Ó Dálaigh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Aidan Kearney (journalist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply