July 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Akiane have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Akiane was changed by Goldie Penn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952503 on 2021-07-20T12:39:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Juliette Leong has been reverted.
Your edit here to Juliette Leong was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeGHrRoP41zt5_oib6zM7NM3kyE_vDgUZ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Goldie Penn! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Goldie Penn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Goldie Penn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asian American Donor Program (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 06:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asian American Donor Program (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Goldie Penn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Juliette Leong, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@GPL93: thank you for checking in. i do not have a conflict to disclose. i learned of juliette on a podcast that she was a guest speaker of and i looked her up while i was looking for pages to edit. it looks like there are some information missing that can be added in for her page. for example, the news said the anchor visited juliette at her house in piedmont, ca; she is a 5 year old spokespersoon for a nonprofit in the medical industry. then i looked up aadp and i can't believe they don't have a wikipedia page yet. i'm new so thank you for the comments. Goldie Penn (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dave Casper. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Serols (talk) 15:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:JDRL Koala per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JDRL Koala. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 21:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goldie Penn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

the results of your investigation is wrong. I have not evaded blocks or bans and I am not editing for different accounts. Nor am I a puppet of JDRL Koala. Goldie Penn (talk) 23:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You'll need to do better than that. JDRL Koala logged on to this IP at 22:57, this account logged in at 22:58. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asian American Donor Program (July 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 16:18, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Asian American Donor Program

edit

  Hello, Goldie Penn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asian American Donor Program, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Asian American Donor Program

edit
 

Hello, Goldie Penn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asian American Donor Program".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply