Gmporr
Welcome
editThank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
| |||||||
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions. |
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Message
editHello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. 05:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Note To Self: Useful Links
editUseful links will go here...
Note To Self: Talk Page Stalkers
editJust found out about Talk Page Stalkers tonight. I like cats so I'm cool with that :)
Note To Self: Photos & Public Domain Questions
editPhotos & Public Domain questions - Media copyright questions page
HelpMe - Question re Use of Talk Pages
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I noticed a page which is already listed as needing spelling improvement. But I also saw some inaccuracies in the page. Should I just note the inaccuracies in the talk page (if I'm not prepared to resolve them myself at this point) or should I be adding tags like "refimprove" so it will show up as needing more improvements than just spelling? If so, where do I find the listing of various templates such as "refimprove" ('cause I know that's not the right one to use for this situation). Thanks :)
- Well you can do either. It's best that you add the tag AND list specifics on the talk page, but the tag is preferred. Below this comment is a bunch of links which all in turn have a bunch of different tags you can use to indicate that there are problems with the article. Legoktm (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Paula Broadwell
editThank you. Yes please, add the necessary information yourself. Thanks --Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 01:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Why am I getting that warning on the file? Could you help me with that? Thanks --Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 01:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback from User:RA0808
editDisambiguation link notification for November 30
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bluetooth keyboard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thumbing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Romo/community involvement
editIn response to your question about the Tony Romo article, the Dallas Cowboys bio of Romo lists some of his community involvement as:
- 2008 Poker for Pets for SPCA of Texas. <-Society for Prevention
- Make-A-Wish Foundation - Several ONE-ON-ONE visits with children each season.
- Cowboys/United Way Hometown Huddle to play Bingo with senior citizens at The Brady Center.
In the reference, click the "more" in the bio to see the full list. Arbor to SJ (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Help me! - Are the Citation Templates broken?
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Did something get broken with the citation templates? When I'm editing an article (any article) and I try to use "cite web", it's acting goofy. My screen goes kind of grey, and I only see the template pop up if I scroll down a bit. But then none of the typical fields are there to be filled in (URL, Title, Author, Access Date, etc). Other than the "Web Citation" title in the popup window the only other stuff there is the row of buttons at the bottom - Insert, Show/hide extra fields, Preview, Cancel, Reset form. I thought it might be my browser (Firefox on Linux) 'cause I just updated it today, but I tried Safari on Mac and am having the same problem. Just started occurring today. Thanks.
Nobel
editPlease consider using the article talk page rather than "null edits" in the article history to complain. Regards! VQuakr (talk) 02:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- @VQuakr: No, your attitude that the nomination wasn't a "big deal" pissed me off enough that I didn't want to interact with you. Gmporr (talk)
- Replying to me in an article edit summary is still interacting. Like I said in the revert edit summary, it really isn't a big deal. To explain in more detail, Nobel prize nominations are secret so any claim that an entity has been nominated is heresay until 50 years after the fact (unless they subsequently are awarded the prize, obviously). More commonly, (as in this case), someone creates an open letter or petition for an eligible individual to submit a nomination; this is sometimes misreported as a "nomination." You can read more about it here. This has been discussed at the village pump a few times as well. VQuakr (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Gmporr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Gmporr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Gmporr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)