Your submission at Articles for creation: Michal Wszola (October 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asparagusus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 22:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, GabrielaMis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 22:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michal Wszola (November 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 16:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The article does not include information about the awards and distinctions received by Professor. Will adding such a fragment allow for an increase in the level of notability? The information may be based on the websites of awarding institutions, documentation of promotion procedures and reports on media websites. There could be a more specific description of scientific activities and ongoing grant projects. Would this be sufficient to dispel doubts related to the criteria? @Qcne GabrielaMis (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi @GabrielaMis. The key is if this person meets the WP:NACADEMIC criteria. Are you able to prove he meets one of them? If so, which? Qcne (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Qcne Hi, in reference to point 1 & 2 of WP:NACADEMIC I added the list of awards and distinctions. Prof. was honoured at national level at least 3 times, as well as his research had significant impact on his scholarly discipline GabrielaMis (talk) 09:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vikuvshah was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vikuvshah (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michal Wszola (December 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 17:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Michal Wszola

edit

  Hello, GabrielaMis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michal Wszola, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply