Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Ardoch Burn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rushton2010 (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Hill Of Row, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 11:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! Friseal, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves Band (August 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves Band (August 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Abdullah Alam (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves Band (October 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves (November 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 04:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves (March 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Company Of Wolves has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Company Of Wolves. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves (May 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphim System was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Seraphim System (talk) 08:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves (June 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company Of Wolves (October 16)

edit

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Company Of Wolves|cv=no|reason=music|details=|comment=Actually if something is not notable it is very hard (near impossible) to establish notability for it so as to have article. So [[WP:RS|more sources] are needed or you may write about another subject. Thank you.|sig=yes}}

MfD nomination of Draft:Company Of Wolves

edit

  Draft:Company Of Wolves, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Company Of Wolves and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Company Of Wolves during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Company Of Wolves

edit

  Draft:Company Of Wolves, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Company Of Wolves (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Company Of Wolves during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 02:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenhead standing stones (March 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Glenhead standing stones

edit
 

Hello, Friseal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Glenhead standing stones.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 17:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Reply