Frank Andrew Chasar

Welcome!

Hello, Frank Andrew Chasar! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 23:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC) Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 07:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Some advice

Hello Frank! I've noticed a lot of your edits get reverted. This is because other editors don't think they are an improvement to the article. The solution then is not to repeatedly instate your change, but rather to start a discussion on the talk page. Yo can read more about this process at Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. For more information about Wikipedia generally considers good images and captions you can see the pages WP:IMAGES and WP:CAPTIONS. You can also use the edit summary underneath the edit box to explain why you made a certain edit.

If you continue to repeatedly add content that is not considered productive without discussion you will likely be blocked in the future. I'm happy to answer any Wikipedia questions you may have. Happy editing! --Trialpears (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022 - edit warring, no explanations or summaries

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Special-T (talk) 00:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Article images

Please STOP changing the picture, or the caption, or both, of the lead image in so many biographical articles. Changes in any longstanding lead picture have to be discussed at the talk page, and consensus must be reached to change them. These repeated changes are disruptive and most of them have been immediately reverted. Consider this your FINAL WARNING that you will be blocked from editing if you continue to change the picture or portrait of the person, sometimes more than once, without consensus or even discussion. -- MelanieN (talk) 04:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent edit warring to change images in high visibility articles and a complete lack of communication or response to concerns raised. You can be unblocked once you provide an appeal that addresses these issues.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)