Florapostewrites

Welcome!

Hi Florapostewrites! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fiddle Faddle 19:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Fiddle Faddle Florapostewrites (talk) 18:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Hardy Players (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Hardy Players and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Hardy Players, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 23:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Florapostewrites! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eternal Shadow Talk 23:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Hardy Players has been accepted

The Hardy Players, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 19:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Unreliable sources

Hi, I noticed that you used a number of unreliable or deprecated sources in your article Hamish Thompson, specifically refs 20, 25, 46, 52, and 56. Please find more reliable sources to support the associated content, or remove the unsourced content, thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Schazjmd! Florapostewrites (talk) 18:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hamish Thompson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamish Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamish Thompson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Natasha Solomons moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Natasha Solomons, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

It is a BLP, so it need in-depth sources. She is notable. Give me a shout when it is done. scope_creep^Talk 17:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi - what further citations are needed? There are already links to articles and interviews. Why is this not good enough to be published? 90.249.68.207 (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

I based the level of information on this entry for Carol Drinkwater - what makes the one on Natasha Solomons unworthy of publication? 90.249.68.207 (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

I've now added further citations and a bit more detail. Hopefully this is enough to satisfy the requirements. Florapostewrites (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

NB the two previous entries here are mine - I didn't realise I wasn't logged in. I also appear to have added the citations to the article without being logged in, so I'm not sure they're attributed to me. Sorry about that! Florapostewrites (talk) 19:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Florapostewrites. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Redtree21 (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)