Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

BERRIN TUNCEL edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BERRIN TUNCEL, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.larchivio.org/xoom/tuncelberrin.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of BERRIN TUNCEL edit

 

The article BERRIN TUNCEL has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 10:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

BERRIN TUNCEL edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BERRIN TUNCEL, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.larchivio.org/xoom/tuncelberrin.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of BERRIN TUNCEL edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BERRIN TUNCEL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.larchivio.org/xoom/tuncelberrin.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO   A&E 11:06, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, FineArtExpert. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article BERRIN TUNCEL, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:18, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015 edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Berrin Tuncel, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Berrin Tuncel, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dear Jimfbleak, I am new user to Wikipedia. Today I wanted to create my own page with the title " Berrin Tuncel " , Turkish Artist. However before I was able to edit my content and add my references --My page was deleted immediately before I had a chance to complete the editings and corrections-- Please I kindly ask you remove the delete--so I can continue my work on my page " Berrin Tuncel " and can present you for your approval considering your remarks as below. Awaiting your kind reply and action on this matter. Thanking in advance, Sincerely, FineArtExpert(FineArtExpert (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC))Reply


Reply edit

Dear Jimfbleak, I am new user to Wikipedia. Today I wanted to create my own page with the title " Berrin Tuncel " , Turk Artist. However before I was able to edit my content and add my references --My page was deleted immediately before I had a chance to complete the editings and corrections-- Please I kindly ask you remove the delete--so I can continue my work on my page " Berrin Tuncel " and can present you for your approval considering your remarks as below. Awaiting your kind reply and action on this matter. Thanking in advance, Sincerely, FineArtExpert(FineArtExpert (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC))


Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

  • it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted. Although you provided some references, one seems to be sourced to a trade fair, the others just confirmed that her works exist. You did not place the refs in line so we don't know what facts each is supporting either
  • it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
  • The article title was in full caps instead of the usual style
  • Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: when she was only six... had various art exhibitions... the first Woman Artist in the old continent who is well-known... is one of the most important pioneers... Unique in her own art style

If you keep removing tags from your article instead of fixing the problem, you may find yourself blocked for disruptive editing

  • We felt that this was due to discrimination... This is not very logical and fair.— accusing admins of bias is unlikely to help your case. Your article was deleted because you did not follow our guidelines
  • We felt...— who is "We"?
  • I was deleted quickly a few times by different users-- like unfair attacks from the users.— accusing editors and admins of bias is unlikely to help your case. Your article was deleted because you did not follow our guidelines
  • The references were reliable enough-- such as BILKENT UNIVERSITY- LIBRARY CATALOGUES — true, but not supporting any of the facts in the article
  • This is entirely a discrimination against " BERRIN TUNCEL"— accusing editors and admins of bias is unlikely to help your case. Your article was deleted because you did not follow our guidelines

Basically, you have ignore our guidelines on writing articles, removed maintenance tags instead of fixing the problems, and then decided it's easier to make accusations of discrimination than follow our rules. You also haven't declared any conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

FineArtExpert, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi FineArtExpert! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Jimfbleak, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your informative messages. As a new User, I have understood how the Wikipedia system works -- thank you. Could you please remove the Protection on the Page " Berrin Tuncel " so I can work on it on the Sandbax and present it to the Administrators for the approval to be published. Again many thanks for your kind assistance. Sincerely, FineArtExpertReply

I would suggest using WP:AFC to create your article. Theroadislong (talk) 10:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you -- I would definitely keep your advises.Could you please remove the Protection on the Page " Berrin Tuncel " so I can work on it on the Sandbax and present it to the Administrators for the approval to be published. Again many thanks for your kind assistance. Sincerely, FineArtExpert