Welcome! edit

Hello Ferbr1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Evilclown93 15:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Port Stanley edit

As explained in the text Puerto Argentino does not have universal use in the Spanish language. Please desist from adding that to the article. The Argentine names are included in the article with due prominence. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:RS for guidance. You also appear to have the intent to edit war, see also WP:3RR. As you also seem aware of the sensitive nature of topynmy in the Falklands I am also issuing a L1 vandalism warning.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stanley, Falkland Islands‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Justin talk 06:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dr tangalanga cd lo mejor.gif) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Dr tangalanga cd lo mejor.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Spanish nationality law edit

Es estable en el sentido de que no sufrirá cambios substanciales, pero desde luego que se puede refinar y ampliar, si es necesario (p. ej. añadir estadísticas sobre origen de los que obtuvieron la nacionalidad por residencia, como en British nationality law). --the Dúnadan 22:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

My talk page edit

Do not make any further reversions on my talk page, I will report you for edit warring. Justin talk 20:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hola Ferbr1, you've possibly realized why I have so many messages to answer in my talk page in the Spanish Wikipedia (including one from you related to the "Valencian language"). I spent my small amount of time in here :-) On the other hand, you shouldn't restore removed messages from talk pages (yes, I know that's behaviour is just the opposite to that we use in the Spanish Wikipedia, where "Archive, don't delete" is the mandatory rule). I had the same issue in here long ago and it was just simply a cultural difference (see WP:DRC for more information). Anyway, I'm happy to see you here. Un abrazo --Ecemaml (talk) 21:57, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Helo edit

Collons Ferbr1, ets per tot... o són manies:)--Lliura (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

D-eu del cel!! avui no dormiré--Lliura (talk) 20:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:Fuentes edit

Para mí no hay lugar a dudas de que es precisamente lo contrario, unido al evidente interés por bloquearme. No hay problema, no voy a discutir más por un trozo de pan con chorizo que está absolutamente referenciado y sin lugar a dudas de que es una nueva forma de llamarle a un chorizo con pan, y de que está considerado un alimento tan español como argentino, de hecho se lo llevó un astronauta español al espacio. En fin, no entiendo el interés en no reflejar la realidad, pero ya te digo, me da lo mismo, no voy a discutir más en vista del eminente interés en mi bloqueo. Saludos y que comas buen pan con chorizo. Rafax (talk) 19:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't call a valuable reference a hoax, the word choripán is also included in a jargon dictionary, not a hoax either. I understand this proceeding as vandalism, as there's no need to claim these things against another user. I don't edit hoaxes in wikipedia, i have been collaborating in this proyect as long as you have. I wont edit the article about these issues anymore, but please, don't say i am including hoaxes in this wiki or any other one, that's not true at all. Thank you. Rafax (talk) 22:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Chorizo asado con pan invento argentino? pero si no te lo crees ni tú hombre. Rafax (talk) 10:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Tú lo has dicho, las referencias van a misa, habrá que comenzar a colocarles a cada una de las que pusiste la plantillita de lo débiles que son. El troleo y el insulto no viene más del que pretende a toda costa hacerle creer a alguien que un chorizo asado dentro de pan francés es un invento argentino. Rafax (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template:Cita web listed at Redirects for discussion edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Cita web. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Cita web redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 13:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Alfajor edit

I have reverted your edition because etymology comes first and also the history of the original product. Alfajor is a protected product with geographical indication in the European Union and so has been referenced in the article. You need another article for your product because it is totally different. Rafax (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have suggested to split the article because its a totally different product with nothing in common but the name. Rafax (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Third opinion edit

I have reverted your edition for several issues: 1) My nickname is this wiki is not a sockpuppet, its the nicknamed i signed for years ago. 2) If you had read the instructions in third opinion, you'd have seen that you sign with 5 tildes so your name does not comes out in the petition. 3) I have used the formal procedure when there is an argument by two users. 4) I have a completely different explanation for my banning in es:wiki which is completely different from the biased one you are giving here. 5) If you had read the instructions, you would have seen that you dont give your opinions in the Third opinion page. Rafax (talk) 21:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you please post in English? I know it's easier for you (and definitely for me) to use the Spanish language, but this is the English wikipedia. It has precise rules for the languages to use (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines). Furthermore, I'm talking here upon the request of EdJohnston. Even if possible, it were definitely not polite to use a language he's not fluent with. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 08:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

TWL Questia check-in edit

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

TWL Questia check-in edit

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Ferbr1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Ferbr1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Héctor Lastra edit

Hello, Ferbr1,

Thanks for creating Héctor Lastra! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for several issues. Could you please add why he is notable (most writers aren't).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply