Felix Farley

Hello Felix Farley! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Fuhghettaboutit 14:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Neil Gaiman

Thanks for the newspaper reference about Gaiman's father's Scientology connections. I have asked the Neil talk page about opinions on what to include regarding this but have been met with silence. I thought I might ask your opinion on what to add to the Gaiman bio about Scientology, if anything. Something like "At the age of 7, in 1968, Gaiman was initially refused entry to the Fonthill School, East Grinstead, because of his father's Scientology connections." and then referencing the Times with the date mentioned. What do you think? Would you be willing to add something like that (hopefully better written) to the bio? Thanks. Magic Pickle 22:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi - we're getting some opposition to the Neil Gaiman Scientology mention in his article apparently because it is felt by some that a reference to the Times in the 1960s isn't good enough because we can't link to it on the web. Do you know of any online reproductions of the Times article in question? Have you seen a copy of the paper yourself? Thanks. Magic Pickle 16:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)