FeistyHonor

Welcome!

Hello, FeistyHonor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:FeistyHonor/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Praxidicae (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:FeistyHonor/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:FeistyHonor/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rose Tan

The article Rose Tan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rose Tan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rose Tan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Tan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

FeistyHonor (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Hello editors, this is my first time writing an article about my favorite author. My goal is for her works to be known to the public. I am not sure whether she already has awards or nomination, I am still trying to look for one. She is still alive and I can ask her however she lives near the volcano that erupted in Tagaytay and hasn't been answering my messages since yesterday. Back to the her article, I have added the reference: http://phr.com.ph/rose-tan/ since it is the website of her publisher (as you can see, the websites here in the Philippines are not entirely professional imaged)

I have added the reference: https://therosetancollections.wordpress.com/ for the people to see that her books has been in publish for more than 20 years now. Not most of them has a soft copy. The recent one has but they are secluded within the publisher's domain.

I have added her interview with a morning talk show for you to see that she is a real human and she exist: * https://www.goodreads.com/videos/113887-rose-tan-author-net25-pambansang-almusal-kwentalk

Kindly let me know why this does not suffice.

FeistyHonor (talk) 12:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)In addition to the references I previously had, I also added the following for news that includes Rose Tan's creation and how her creation were known in the Phillipines: https://www.rappler.com/entertainment/34612-pulp-fiction-pop-lit https://entertainment.abs-cbn.com/tv/updates/18042218-throwback-precious-hearts-romances-presents-bud-brothers-2009

I have also removed her as an author and put her in a romance writer instead. I have removed all the incriminating phrases that I have gained from our personal conversation and her facebook posts.

I hope this helps, still am not familiar with how Wikipedia works. But please let me know if these information suffice for the entry not to be deleted. Thank you.

FeistyHonor (talk) 01:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC) @GPL93, There was an update 17 hours ago that the Rose Tan article has been reviewed. Can I remove the deletion notice now? I'm not sure whether that review means that the articles has been approved to stay. Thank you for your attention.

FeistyHonor (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Hello,

I am currently working on a Wikipedia page of my favorite writer, Rose Tan. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Tan. My goal is to keep the Philippine literary alive and updated and for people to be aware that such writer exists. In her Bibliography, I have added a list of her creations that I got from my own collection of books or from people in the Philippines that has the complete collections (Link of the list from fellow collector: ).

The following reasons for not having these lists available online: 1. As stated above, the said list is available from the people that bought the printed books from the 90's to present. 2. The Philippines is only recently emerging from paper-based. The publisher themselves does not provide these full details except for their site that sells these books. Link:

These sources are being a problem and deleting the entry because: 1. These sources are discussing the resources in Facebook which would mean that Wikipedia would not consider it as a reliable source. 2. Wikipedia would consider a website that sells these books as an advertisement and not a reference.

My questions now are: 1. If I present the facebook group link as a reference, would it be counted as valid resource? 2. Are the blogs from the readers enough to suffice? Wordpress, forums, Tumblr, etc? 3. Is it enough that the editors (in this case me) have read all her works in printed? 4. Can you tell me (straight to the point) what else I can do for the article not to be deleted?

Straightforward responses would be highly appreciated. Thank you.FeistyHonor (talk) 10:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)--FeistyHonor (talk) 10:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)--FeistyHonor (talk) 10:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

References

January 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Rose Tan Book Launch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rose Tan Book Launch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rose Tan Book Launch.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rose Tan Book Launch.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2962408.Rose_Tan. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)