Fantasydragon

If you have a suggestion, recommendation, or problem with my edits, leave me a note. I will reply here, so please watch my talk page.

safe code FFVII CC

I'm on a libary Comp, and and I need to get the laughing safe code, but they blocked the site. I noticed that you edit the article, so if you know it, please tell me, thanks. Simon_K^S_K 20:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

It's random everytime you play the game, I believe. Here's how to get it. Someone on GameFAQs posted it.

4th Mystery: Your goal here is to break the safe combination. After talking to the boy head to Shinra manor. There are four rooms where you look through from the peephole. Each room will correspond to the number on the safe you have to enter.

Room One Where: Northeast on the second floor. How: Count the books not on the shelves, however the books on the top shelf count and those on the chair. This number is hardest because it can frustrate a lot of people (even me.) If it comes to it, guess (like I did.)

Room Two Where: The bottom floor main hall, in the room to the east. How: Count the Funny Faces (monster) but beware they disappear for a moment or so. And some hide in the corners so be sure to search.

Room Three Where: Western room on the second floor. How: Count the blue Banora apples and the apple can. Do not count the green potions.

Room Four Where: The west door in the main hall. How: Count the chairs. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I got it. Here.

Simon_K^S_K has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

For caring. Simon_K^S_K 21:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Ha, no problem! Thanks for the cookie. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries

I know you are a fairly experienced editor, but please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Atlantabravz (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:+44 Template

Seriously? That's crazy. I can't believe no one noticed it for almost a year. XD WereWolf (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

User:USEDfan

User:RaC FB, which you previously dealt with was a sock puppet of USEdfan. I just wanted to let you know he was still active so you could spot him in the future. I don't ever watch the ratchet & clank pages so I thought I'd give you a heads up. Cheers. Landon1980 (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah, thank you. I had my suspicions but I saw USEDfan editing with another account, so I didn't think any more of it. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Turns out he had several sock puppets, but they were all wiped out when a checkuser was ran. He is never going to give up, he took it as far as torturing me off wiki. I started that thread that got his original account banned to begin with, and he's tortured me ever since. At one time all my usernames were pretty similar so he managed to find various accounts of mine online. Landon1980 (talk) 03:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I-Empire (film)

Thanks for the undo. I accidentally hit the revert button and you beat me to it on the fixup. -- Tcncv (talk) 00:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I figured you knew that, but I went ahead and fixed the edit. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

AVA Album/Movie in 2010

RE: Edit I am not sure we should have this as a definitive statement. Tom repeatedly mentioned that he is not sure how it will unfold. It might not be released in 2010. Perhaps it could be rephrased to properly articulate the ambiguous nature of his modcast comments. --Punkrocker27ka (talk) 20:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, I don't really know. I didn't add that information or source in...but I think as long as it's sourced right now, then we should keep it, until it changes again. And since it IS the blink-182 article, I was actually wondering if we should include that sentence about the film at all. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 20:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I was thinking the same thing. I'm not sure if it should be included at all...--Punkrocker27ka (talk) 20:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey, you're a member of blink-182 Online, right? Fantasy Dragon (talk) 20:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Yep --Punkrocker27ka (talk) 04:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Plus 44

Since you seem like a Plus 44 fanatic eager to edit anything about them breaking up, I'm sure that you also go to that board as the band itself rely on that website for facts about the band. So, I'm guessing that such a website and message board, which allegedly doesn't post gossip and lies, would prove that they are so reliable for news. Feel free to contact them if you want them to know that Plus isn't really splitting up. (121.55.200.229 (talk) 04:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC))Tashanna

Please make new posts at the end of the page. Thanks. I'm not a +44 "fanatic." I just happen to be a fan of the band. I hardly ever even go to that board anymore, but that's besides the point. Just linking to some message board doesn't prove ANYTHING. That's just linking to a message board about the band. I never said anything about the site lying or anything like that but there is nothing verifiable on a link to a forum. And no, +44 ISN'T really splitting up. Mark says right here that he doesn't "consider it done." So next time you want to change an article with such a big edit such as that, find a proper source for it. The band isn't officially broken up (as proved by Mark himself) so editing the page otherwise would just be a lie. And to add, that's even on the article itself with a proper cite for it and everything. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 04:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts Re:Chain of Memories

• You keep deleting my edit, why its true Kingdom Hearts Re: Chain of Memories is being released in Europe stop deleting my post i just joined.

What do you mean "keep" deleting? That was the first time I removed any of your edits. Anyway, I removed it because it is unsourced. Also, another Wiki isn't a reliable source. I can't find anything else anywhere that states that this is true. Unless you can provide a real, reliable source, then it'll be fine to add that to the article. And it doesn't matter if you just joined or not; people are allowed to remove your edits if it applies to policy. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 19:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I put up the same edit 3 times thats what I mean, I find that hard to believe that their Wiki is unreliable, I trust them, it would appear trust seems to mean nothing. I've visited many of their pages there are no inaccuracies on their Wiki. I read in a British game magazine in their previews section, but I read it in the shop I can't remember the name but they said it was, then the Wiki confirmed isn't that enough proof?

Another Wiki site is just like Wikipedia. Anyone can edit it meaning ANYONE can add anything they want. But it has to be SOURCED for it to be RELIABLE. I'm not saying that Wiki is full of lies, I'm just saying linking to a site that anyone in the world can edit with anything they want isn't reliable, unless it is properly sourced. Okay, if you read it, then search it online and find a source for it. Just because you say something doesn't make it proof, nor does someone adding that information to a Wiki make it proof. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

• You SAID it WASN'T coming to Europe, then WHY does VGRELEASE say it is ? Unless its another Wiki anyone can edit

First off, please do not vandalize my talk page. And also, this edit was really immature. You can get blocked for stuff like that. I never said that site was a Wiki site, did I? Now you're just putting words in my mouth. At the time you edited the article, there was NO reliable source for it. Also, I'm not sure of the reliability of VGReleases. The site lists Kingdom Hearts 3 as being released for the PS3, 360, Wii, PSP and DS. This game hasn't even been officially confirmed to be in production, and I highly doubt that it would be released on all these systems. However, the UK GameSpot DOES list a release date for this game, but I would like to point out that GameSpot isn't an official outlet, like say, Square Enix themselves. But for now, if that's what's confirmed, then we can use it. The link to the Wiki wasn't reliable that's why it wasn't reliable. But GameSpot is a little bit safer than a Wiki site. Understand? Don't take this hard on yourself. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

• Wow, not one or two, but three counts of vandalism? This is definitely the way to get blocked. I do not understand why you are so sensitive about the EU release of Re:CoM. It's really not a big deal. Please stop vandalizing the page; your edits are obstructive and unnecessary and just plain annoying to deal with. If you have a constructive way to improve the article, then go ahead, but this vandalism will not be tolerated much longer. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

1 I know I deleted a bit but I had to make room, 2 me & Resistance have nothing to do with you so butt out and 3 easy for you to say its available in your contry, I'm here here in Ireland an English speaking country wondering why the two company's that cash in frequently ( and if you don't believe me watch The return of Jafar and Spirits Within ) aren't probably cashing in on this, meanwhile I'm getting screwed around with by Wikipedia wondering if its coming out or not, I mean I don't whats going on and this is really hurting me, I just want concrete proof it's not coming out, no probablys I want definitelys, I came here with the best intentions but I'm at my wit's end here

First off, what does Resistance, The Return of Jafar and Spirits Within have to do with anything? I'm not even the one that was undoing your edits to the Resistance pages. That was User:Kyle1278. Secondly, seriously, please stop vandalizing my talk page. You didn't have to "clear room." There's plenty of room here. And besides, if I need more room, I would do it myself. And now you're blanking 2 pages? What does have to do with anything, anyway? Did you see that I edited those pages, so you thought you could blank them to get back at me? Although it seems that you have been blocked, so that's good. But in case you come back, which I'm sure you will. What are you talking about me lying to you? I've never lied about a thing while talking to you. It's not my fault you got blocked; you were vandalizing Wikipedia. That's your fault. And for the record, I never SAID it WASN'T coming out in Europe. I said your source was bad. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

• Oh, don't worry, I noticed that you were back. Also, I already know what the Kingdom Hearts series is. There's really no point in adding that to all the pages I edit. Your multiple counts of vandalism are really cool, by the way. Though, it looks like you've been blocked....again. Please stop with the vandalism. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

• Wow, you really do not give up, do you? Seriously, I never said you were wrong or that the source was wrong. I said it was bad, unreliable. Your edits are becoming really immature and what you are doing is just plain vandalism. Please stop with the vandalizing and trying to make me feel bad over nothing. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Link to song

Well, the reason why I linked it was because it was a hit song. So I linked it and the other hit songs were linked, so I thought it would be best to link it. Otherwise the other hit songs (Except for man overboard) should not be linked in that wikipage MySummerJob (talk) 21:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The link leads to the article about a carousel. The article for the song was deleted/redirected. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Thank you for responding MySummerJob (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

blink-182online??

Hey, I was wondering are you an active user on the forums by any chance? If so, what is your name there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MySummerJob (talk • contribs) 21:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem for the other response, and ha, yeah, I'm a user there. =) It's the same as this one but with an underscore. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 04:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Apology

I'm well and truly sorry for the vandalism, I was having a hard couple of weeks and then there was wrong information on Wikipedia which made things worse since I trust it so much, I sincerely promise that I won't ruin more pages, I know what I did was childish and inexcusable, I know its not good enough but I'm still just a kid, so please accept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretAgentkingdomkey2 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

That's okay, man. Apology accepted. I hope things get better for you. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:PUNC

Hello there. I noticed you were placing quotation marks outside the punctuation, which I'm afraid is wrong in some instances. As per WP:PUNC: "Punctuation marks are placed inside the quotation marks only if the sense of the punctuation is part of the quotation. This practice is referred to as logical quotation; it is used by Wikipedia both because of the principle of minimal change, and also because the method is less prone to misquotation, ambiguity, and the introduction of errors in subsequent editing." See also WP:LQ. Hope this helped. 84.215.17.68 (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Umbrella Vanilla Sky Single Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Umbrella Vanilla Sky Single Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Blink-182

This user helped promote Blink-182 to good article status.

Well done. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 10:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Sounds of Summer Sampler Vol. 2

The article The Sounds of Summer Sampler Vol. 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meting WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SoundsofSummerVol2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SoundsofSummerVol2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fantasydragon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fantasydragon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)