User talk:Fang Aili/Archive3

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Moe Epsilon in topic Re:troubles
Archive This is an archive of inactive discussions. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.
Archive 1: 9 August 2005 - 13 February 2006
Archive 2: 14 February 2006 - 21 March 2006
Archive 3: 15 February 2006 - 28 April 2006
Archive 4: 29 April 2006 - 6 June 2006
Archive 5: 6 June 2006 - 23 June 2006
Archive 6: 23 June 2006 - 1 August 2006
Archive 7: 1 August 2006 - 22 August 2006
Archive 8: 23 August 2006 - 2 September 2006
Archive 9: 2 September 2006 - 13 October 2006
Archive 10: 14 October 2006 - 6 November 2006
Archive 11: 6 November 2006 - 21 November 2006
Archive 12: 22 November 2006 - 20 December 2006
Archive 13: 21 December 2006 - 5 January 2007
Archive 14: 6 January 2007 - 6 February 2007
Archive 15: 6 February 2007 - 5 March 2007
Archive 16: 5 March 2007 - 28 March 2007
Archive 17: 29 March 2007 - 3 May 2007
Archive 18: 4 May 2007 - 20 June 2007
Archive 19: 1 July 2007 - 25 July 2007
Archive 20: 26 July 2007 - 13 December 2007
Archive 21: 14 December 2007 - 28 April 2011

I like it, although I'm not a trekkie :) --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sceptre (talkcontribs)

RfA thanks! edit

  Hi Erica! Thank you for supporting my RfA. It passed at 105/1/0, putting me in WP:100 - I'm delighted and surprised! I'm always happy to help out, so if you need anything, please drop me a line. Cheers! ➨ REDVERS 20:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #1 edit

Reach out is a program aimed at allowing users to bring issues that they have had in Wikipedia to a listening, sympathetic and caring audience:
"No one can know how we feel if we do not say. We cannot expect to get understanding if we do not ask for it. No one will dispute that sometimes life's issues are too much for one person. It is fair to say that sometimes Wikipedia's problems fall under the same heading. This is a place where you can bring the bruises that can sometimes be got on this project for attention."
The Stress alerts program aims at identifying users who are stressed, alerting the community of thier stress and works in tandem with the Stressbusters at trying to identify causes of stress and eliminating them.
Note from the editor
Welcome to this new format of the Esperanza Newsletter, which came about during the last Advisory Council meeting - we hope you like it! The major changes are that each month, right after the Council meeting, this will be sent out and will include two featured programs and a sum up of the meeting. Also, it will be signed by all of the Advisory Council members, not just Celestianpower. Have an Esperanzial end of March, everyone!
  1. Future meetings are to be held monthly, not fortnightly as before.
  2. Bans and Access level changes (apart from autovoice) in the IRC channel are to be reported at the new log.
  3. In the IRC channel, there is going to be only one bot at a time.
  4. The charter requires members to have 150 edits and 2 weeks editing. Why this is the case will be clarified.
  5. A new Code of Conduct will be drafted by JoanneB and proposed to the Esperanza community.
  6. The NPA reform idea is to be dropped officially.
  7. Charter ammendments are to be discussed in future, not voted on.
  8. The Advisory Council is not going to be proposed to be expanded by the Advisory Council themselves, if others want to propose it, they will listen.
Signed...
Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, KnowledgeOfSelf and FireFox 17:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Star Trek edit

Hi,

Many thanks for your edits at the Portal. However we've already shown Voyager as the Featured picture...right at the beginning (check the page history), so we'll need to choose a new one. Any suggestions? Many thanks Pydos 20:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vincet Gallo edit

It's not vandalism, it's the truth. Have you revery read USA Today, or do you just wait for Jon Stewart to deliver you the 'news' every night? P.S. - I'm a student at Penn State University, with access to over 100 computers, all with internet access. You can NEVER block me. I'm invincible, and you can't do anything but sit on your ass and watch it happen. Welcome to the future of Wikipedia... Have a nice day. 68.81.182.9 21:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

DELETING large amounts of text??? I was ADDING large amounts of text. Good lordy, you need to pull yourself together! P.S. - I'm clearly accomplishing something, I'm pissing off hundreds of people at once. We're part of Daniel Brandt's team, 'Wikipedia Watch', and our eventual goal to get Wikipedia privately edited. It will happen some day soon, trust me. Jimmy Wales will cave some day soon enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.182.9 (talkcontribs)

Milwaukee Article H20 edit

No problem. I'm glad to help. I wish I could contribute more, but you guys/gals are working hard and fast to make it an excellent article. Keep it up, please!--PaddyM 04:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vandal edit

168.10.27.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) blocked for a period of 24 hours due to vandalsim. You friendly admin, ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 19:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for the quick reverts on the vandalism on my userpage. The vandal appears to be Jonathanbender (talkcontribspage movesblock userblock log) who was returning. It looks like he got a 24hour block (not sure why not an indef. block...). In any event, thanks for the help. --TeaDrinker 21:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your B'day greeting edit

Hi, Thanks for your birthday greetings. Nice of you to do so. --hydkat 05:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

DaGizza's RfA edit

 
Thanks!

Hi Fang Aili/Archive3, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. GizzaChat © 12:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 17:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Franks James edit

Extensive info on Reverend Robert James belongs in his article not in his son's. 132.241.246.111 22:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

How did you know ? edit

How did you know that someone changed my page ? Can I rollback the change ?Hamed Alhoori 22:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Can I connect to other wiki using this tool ? ex http://www.alnaja7.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page ? what would be the channel , server and port ? Hamed Alhoori 00:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Adminship? edit

Hi Erica! I've seen you a lot on RC patrol, and I am impressed with your contributions. Since you have a good amount of contributions to articles, a good record of fighting vandalism, and a good record of being sensible, I wonder if you would you be interested in accepting a nomination for adminship? Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'll be logging off here in a few minutes and probably won't be back before Monday. I have therefore taken the liberty of setting up the nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fang Aili. If you choose to accept it, which I hope you will, you'll need to answer the questions and bring the nomination to the main WP:RFA page. Good luck! Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aristotle edit

I'm not sure what script or program you're using for vandalism reverts, but like most of them it tends to produce edit strings like this. It takes longer to do things manually, but I'd really recommend it. When a recent bit of vandalism is reverted, and a previous bit ignored, it can hide the previous bit (which is often more serious) from other editors. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ah, if it works like "rollback", then it shares rollback's limitations. I used to do the same; I'd see that the last two edits were vandalistic, use rollback, and find that the first vandalism was still there. Rollback only reverts the edits of the last editor, so if two or more different editors have vamdalised in succession you have to revert manually. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm back from my break though I will not be very active edit

Hey Aili, thanks for the comments. I'm back on a semi active basis, but I do hope to come across you while on the wiki. ;) KnowledgeOfSelf 16:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vandal edit

24.66.94.140 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has been blocked for one hour as it is a shared IP. Thanks for posting on AIV. Thanks. Your friendly admin, ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 19:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Uranium trioxide edit

Please take a step back from this article and consult its talk page. What really is going on there is a dispute between User:Nrcprm2026 and everyone else that has spilled over from Depleted uranium. The case has reached arbitration after a failed mediation.

Not everything that looks like vandalism is vandalism. The version that I reverted back to is actually the version of User:Physchim62 (or something very much like it - do check the history), who was mediator on that case and handed it back to Arbitration because James was just plain impossible to work with. (For the sake of the encyclopedia and my own sanity I do hope that James is banned from DU and friends or at least put on 1RR probation.) 82.41.26.244 20:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

 
For kindness

from the anonymous admirer editor. 82.41.26.244 23:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

LBC edit

The content was not removed - it was moved to LBC 97.3 62.49.27.213 23:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Milwaukee flag edit

Hi. The Milwaukee flag will probably require replacement, as the justification I used when I originally posted the flag is no longer valid for it. Nava gets all their flag images from the Flags of the World (FOTW)website, which had previous justification under the FOTW-pic tag and the PD-flag tag I originally posted, which are not valid since Wikipedia admin axed any "non-commercial use only" uses of these tags. City flags are tricky to justify at this point. Your best bet on this would be to create an image of the flag ones self and license under GFDL. Until then, this image should be deleted. Cheers. SoundGod3 07:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

You would not want him for a neighbor edit

Malcolm X wrote a book in which he described his criminal activities. He was a hoodlum before being imprisoned. He found religion while in prison. I read the book. He was not a saintly person early in his life. RxBrainwashers 12:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Footy Star edit

Please don't restore prod notices as you did here. Prod is for uncontroversial deletions only, so once the tag is removed, if you think the article should be deleted, you should send the article to AfD. Please see WP:PROD#What this process is NOT for. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Trench Warfare edit

Thank you for experimenting with the page Trench Warfare on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 151.203.227.80 18:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey there. Sorry dude, this guy got me, too. A neat idea, actually. Anyway, for the audience's sake: it's a vandal giving out warning templates to people who revert him. --Chodorkovskiy 19:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Who needs Esperanza when vandals like this bring a community together? Nothing like sharing a warning. T K E 19:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =)--ApolloBoy 19:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your RfA edit

I've added a few questions to your RfA. When you have a moment, I'd appreciate if you would take a look at them. Thanks. JoshuaZ 01:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edits edit

So how about 40,000? ;) Renata 02:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks... edit

For fixing the vandalism on my userpage. Some of these wikinarcissists can't seem to understand manners or rules. :) Pat Payne 04:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

your RFA edit

I understand. I would greatly appreciate it (more bluntly put: I'd change my vote to support) if, upon successful promotion to Administrator status, you'd begin hanging out in the #vandalism-en-wp IRC channel. It's where a large number of counter vandalism fighters go to communicate and it has live bot announcements that supplement (or in my case, supplant) CDVF: I find them more useful than CDVF myself. Plus, when we find multiple instances of vandalism there, there's not always an administrator watching to help out with it. Your additional set of eyes would be appreciated. SWATJester   Ready Aim Fire! 16:27, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've changed my vote. Please see the summary along with the vote change. SWATJester   Ready Aim Fire! 19:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Many Thanks edit

That was a persistent vandal. Not sure why he/she/it/they was/were so obsessed with labelling me gay. Especially as they seemed to be using a US ISP. (For the record, I'm not gay (I'm bisexual)). Not sure what their point was. Alex Law 17:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Warning users edit

Hi, I see that you have been warning users who vandalize Wikipedia. It's great, but I have small request for you. Can you use '== Month year ==' on users' talk pages? It's sometimes weird when you see warning added on 'April' below 'March' section... Jacek Kendysz 14:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, it'll be much more clear. Jacek Kendysz 14:43, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? {{prod}} can have a parameter. edit

Hello there. You have proposed the article P.A.I.N. for deletion without providing a reason why in the {{prod}} template. You may be interested to know that you can add your reasoning like that: {{prod|Add reason for deletion here}}. This will make your reasoning show up in the article's deletion notice. It will also aid other users in considering your suggestion on the Proposed Deletions log. See also: How to propose deletion of an article. Sandstein 17:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

About Garfield edit

Thanks for reverting the article Garfield and sorry for the thing what I did. I just want to add the interwiki "th:การ์ฟิลด์", but I don't know what's happen. Maybe something was missed. Sorry again. --203.144.144.164 17:51, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Spam message from MiszaBot edit

File:SpamInACan.jpgThis is a spam message from the friendly Misza13's spam bot! This message carries virtually no information, so please feel free to delete it altogether.

revert edit

No problem :)--Shanel 18:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2 edit

The Barnstar Brigade is a new program aimed at giving more very deserving yet unappreciated users barnstars. It will officially start on 2006-04-09, but signing up is encouraged before this date:
"Here in Wikipedia, there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go un-appreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go un-noticed. Sadly, these editors often leave the project. As Esperanzians, we can help to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. A project the size of Wikipedia has thousands of editors, so there are plenty of people out there who deserve recognition, one just has to find them. The object of this program is not to flood editors with Barnstars, but to seek out people who deserve them, and make them feel appreciated."
The Stress alerts program aims at identifying users who are stressed, alerting the community of thier stress and works in tandem with the Stressbusters at trying to identify causes of stress and eliminating them.
Information
Welcome to the second issue of the new format Esperanza Newsletter - we hope you still like it! This week, it was delivered diligently by our new dogsbody. MiszaBot (run by Misza13): any execution complaints should go to him. Content comments should be directed at the Esperanza talkpage. Thanks!
  1. The next elections: Approval voting as before and, also as before, an previous leadership member can run. Please submit your name for voting in the relevant section of this page. Voting starts on 2006-04-23 and ends on 2006-04-30. There will be three places up for grabs as KnowledgeOfSelf is leaving Wikipedia. Please see the previously linked page for full details.
  2. The Code of Conduct is now ready for extensive discussion! Specific comments should go to the Code of Conduct talk page, discussion of having one at all should be directed to the main Esperanza talk page.
  3. The current process for accepting proposals for new programs has been deemed fine. All Advisory Council members and the Admin Gen are to endevour to be bold when viewing discussion. If they feel that consensus has been reached, they will act accordingly.
A plea from the editor...
The propsed programs page is terribly underused! Please leave any comments, good or bad, on the page, to help us determine the membership's thoughts on the ideas there.
Signed...
Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, KnowledgeOfSelf and FireFox 19:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Questions edit

I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, formerly only making edits anonymously before deciding to join up. I see you have a lot of fun and otherwise templates on your userpage; would you be kind enough to point me towards where I can find them? I've found official templates, but none of these "harmless but useless" ones. Also, I recently came across an instance of information that was unverifiable in an article (click here) and wrote about it in the discussion page, but chose to delete it - is this common or even accepted practice? Thanks again for your time and consideration, and I hope these questions aren't too intrusive. Sethimothy 23:02, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been a great help in furthering my editing skills, and are an excellent asset to the WikiCommunity! Have a delicious chocoloate chip cookie for your kindess. Keep up the hard work!
  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Anyone who is helpful or as diligent as Fang Aili deserves to be recognized with a baker's dozen chocolate chip cookies. This award, while not as tasty, recognizes this - and manages to do so without crumbling when you bite into it.

Re: Kropotkin article edit

To Fang Aili, I tried to to correct some minor typographical errors in the Kropotkin timeline and got hit with a "Vandalism" message when I pressed the SAVE button. Should I forget about trying to edit this article? Regards, Simon

205.147.242.4 15:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Simon, April 8, 2006, 11:03 am GMTReply

Re: Kropotkin Revisited edit

To Fang Ali,

My second edit of the Kropotkin article worked. Thanks for the help.
Simon

205.147.242.4 15:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Simon 8 April 2006 11:37 am UTCReply

Wikibreak edit

I hope real life turns out okay - have a nice and relaxing Wikibreak! -- Natalya 19:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Request for Adminship edit

Congratulations! Consensus having been reached, it is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Please take a moment to review the Administrators' reading list and the Administrators' how-to guide before using any of your shiny new buttons. :-) If you need assistance or advice, please feel free to request help from other administrators at the Administrator's Noticeboard and Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents, or to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations! Essjay TalkContact 01:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations edit

 
Pesky rules mean that only a Bureaucrat can give you the mop, but I can give you a picture of one. T K E 20:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Let's put all congratulations in one easy to find place! - nathanrdotcom

Congratulations on becoming an admin. Happy editing! GfloresTalk 01:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! —       nathanrdotcom (TCW) 03:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yep, congrats! Please don't spam my talk page with a thank you ;) Renata 03:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Fang! Congratulations on your promotion! Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! And happy sysopping! -- Tangotango 09:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well done and congratulations!! -- Natalya 11:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congrats, use your powers well. GizzaChat © 11:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! --Misza13 T C 11:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congrats! I am happy for you! --Siva1979Talk to me 15:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well done! :o) ➨ REDVERS 20:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks everyone!! I'm on vacation right now (out of town), but I look forward to using my admin skills. :) --Fang Aili 說嗎? 17:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations from the land of ice and snow. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! —Ruud 20:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations and best wishes! Use your mop well! --Andy123(talk) 20:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Congrats, and have a good vacation! :o) EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 20:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations from me also! --Tone 20:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations and have a good vacation! Weatherman90 21:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

You deserved it. Congrats! (^'-')^ Covington 22:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Congratulations on becoming an admin. I'm sure you'll make a fine one.--Alhutch 22:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Congrats! Though I'm kicking myself for not voting. _-M o P-_ 22:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Best wish for your adminship.--Jusjih 14:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Here's some late-arriving congratulations...   Slowmover 15:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)]]Reply
Congrats! (so what if I'm slow!) ---J.Smith 19:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

A KISS Rfa Thanks edit

Thank you, I've been promoted. pschemp | talk 01:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Get Off the Computer! edit

I saw what you said on Esparenza, to tell you to "get the hell offline" if anyone catches you editing. And I did. So, GET OFF THE COMPUTER AND DO WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO!!!. :)Omni ND 18:15, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Hello,

Thank you for replacing the cuneiform image on my User Page. If that image is copyrighted, it has to be one of the oldest copyrights on earth.
Be healthy,
Michael David 23:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your help edit

I really would like to ask you to make me a favour: please unblock User:ROGNNTUDJUU! I think that is a mistake and this user needs a second chance. Best regards,--StabiloBoss 12:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Help! edit

Hello again,

I need a little help. I was editing something and was somehow accidently logged out. After I discovered it and logged back on I found that the Cuneiform image on my User Page was way too large. I don't know enough about the mechanics of Wiki to reduce it to where it was. Can you help?
Thank you,
Michael David 19:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply


Thank you!
Michael David 20:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Closing off AfDs edit

Instructions on how to clsoe off AfD discussions can be found at Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Articles_for_Deletion_page. I have closed off Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luckyvietman for you. -- Saberwyn 23:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Help with a problem user edit

Hi Fang Aili. I'd like to request some support in the spirit of defend each-other. I've been having some problems with an anon user 67.172.194.15 (talk · contribs). The user has been causing a disruption in one of the articles I watch, Star Sonata. The user has been adding patently untrue content, removing sourced material and engaging in personal attacks. If you look at 67's contributions 90% of his edits have been in the vein of disrupting SS article. I've really tried to talk nice to this person but I've gotten nothing but insults back. I've reported to WP:PAIN but I doubt that will result in any kind of permanent resolution. Thanks, ---J.Smith 07:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oh, your going on a wikibreak? Sorry, my mistake, I'll go bother some other admin about it then:) Enjoy your break. ---J.Smith 07:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Happy Spring celebration / Easter (as your preferences and beliefs dictate) edit

 
Here's hoping that if the bunny leaves you any beans they're this kind! ++Lar: t/c 14:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

 
Happy Easter/Have a good Passover/Have a nice day...or this bunny will eat you :) Where (talk) 15:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
 
Happy Easter! --Misza13 T C 16:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikibreak and new job edit

Good luck with the new job! I hope your wikibreak is nice and relaxing. -- Natalya 14:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)Reply







Congratulations on Your RFA! edit

You're welcome for vote I made in your RFA and I wish you the best of luck in the future as an admin. Congratulations and happy editing! Patman2648 03:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC) Bet you didn't I knew how to rock n' roll?Reply

Peripetus edit

Hi, Peripetus should be removed as it doesn't exist and only can cause confusion. There is no point in amassing collections of no-existing words. I insist, please do consider deletion. Thanks Lycaon 10:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thouhg I still have problems with the concept of keeping wrong names, I can live with your arguments and will leave it at that. Thanks for the reply. Lycaon 16:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Old Skool Esperanzial note edit

Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pnatt edit

As soon as he got off his block he posted this offinsive message on my talkpage. Xtra 23:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

My mini-rfc edit

thanks! But as you created that, I created another version. Can you delete my version?--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 23:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, I meant my version, but either or....thank you for all the help.--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 00:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
I added a link to it on my userpage. I'll add another link on Esperanza talk.--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 00:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Your chinese userpage is very helpful. I'm learning chinese myself, and vocab help like that is a great help. 谢谢!--The ikiroid (talk )(Help Me Improve) 00:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Closing AFDs edit

Hiya! If you relist an article, please remove it from the old day's log and add it to the current day's log. The reason is that a bot creates a page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old showing the debates which are ready for closure. It doesn't understand relistings. If you look at that page, you'll see that the 3 "open" debates for April 15 are actually your relistings :) No reply needed, and this isn't a complaint - the guidelines weren't very clear so I've just toughened them up :) --kingboyk 05:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome Back edit

Nice to have you back. You were missed! --D-Day(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?) 22:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pnatt edit

This user is becoming a serial pest and is acting in bad faith involving himself in continual disruptive editting. I think a long ban should be considered. Xtra 10:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Jonas Bergh edit

please redelete and protect. Thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 15:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much. Please also close this while you're at it; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonas Bergh. You're the best. Cheers. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 15:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

{{deletedpage}} cheers - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 15:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pnatt edit

He's just got out of his block and goes straight back to the same disruptive editing on Australian Football League [1]. Xtra 21:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

You have to understand that I reverted from the British spelling. Pnatt 21:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

First off, it IS AUSTRALIAN SPELLING. Second, you have been warned about twenty times now not to make that exact edit or type of edit. You cannot now come and plead "British spelling" which, mind you is closer to Australian Spelling than the American Spelling you perpetuate is. Xtra 21:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Which dictionary do you use? Pnatt 22:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

If it's Maquarie then you'll have to tell me proof. Pnatt 22:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou. Xtra 00:29, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

PLEASE DELETE MerleFest edit

You are the second person to remove my speedy tag. I need someone to clear the namespace so that I can move the article to the proper name, MerleFest we will then make a redirect that goes from Merlefest to the new location at MerleFest. I have explained this in the edit history and on the page. I'm confused that you guys are able to revert without seeing these things. -MrFizyx 00:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fang Aili, thanks for taking care of the problem. It looks great. -MrFizyx 00:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, you're idea would have been fine. There was no real history to move this time. Thanks again, I do appreciate the help. -MrFizyx 02:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re:troubles edit

Yes, troubles. They are among me. I don't access to Esperanza's irc or any irc for that matter so my only means of contact is here or e-mail. (yes, I have e-mail enabled). Moe ε 03:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply