User talk:Extraordinary Machine/Archive 11

Orphaned fair use image (Image:KaDee Strickland and Christina Ricci in Anything Else.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:KaDee Strickland and Christina Ricci in Anything Else.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Reply or Electic Storm

Thats a whole list you've writen :P

1. First about I'm Not Dead. I believe people are interrested in a good structure were they can read what they wanne read. If they want album information (and I believe that, that kind of information is about the songs and the history of its writing) the can go directly to that paragraph and the same for its reception. Some of them are just interrested in the numbers and charts and not about the album. To read such a long piece of text is I think "onhandy". And you point to the official wikipedia explaination, but I just don't agree. What do you say?
2. Recources: Alot of people use http://pulsemusic.proboards48.com/ also as a reliable source in wikipedia pages. Because wikipedia isn't removing them I believe a same kind of site (uk message board) can then be used also. But I get you're point and I will, in the future, do it differently.
3. Not Too Late/Thinking About You: I see were you're going and I understand it. Hadn't thought about it.
4. References: mmm....I really don't get your piont. But if you want it that way, whatever. Alot of other wikipedia pages do it same as I did it. User:Electric Storm (Electric Storm89 13:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC))

Mariah Carey FAR

Mariah Carey has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Hilary Duff: Dignity article

Thanks for sorting out the track listings on the page recently, some "idiot" ruined the code and when I saw late last night had the page was missing. I reverted it as much as I could, it's good you tidied it up.

Tipexcom2 14:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Te Busqué

I was going through the Juanes-related articles and saw your comment at Talk:Te Busqué. A lot of the articles on foreign language topics have inconsistent capitalizations, and WP:CAPS is either completely ambiguous or doesn't mention it at all, so I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (capitalization). ShadowHalo 00:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering if you have any more input on the topic; I'd like to wrap this up and hopefully make any necessary changes. ShadowHalo 21:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Reaction

First± thank you again for that long list. Maybe if I give you a reaction you can give mé a reaction on my reaction. Thats confusing isn´t it :P. I will change I´m Not Dead if you please. But the structure of the page is in my believe good. Read what I have to say about that above. And thank you for deleting all the info I wrote, where I put a lot of time in. Really nice and really friendly.

And about the meaning of the songs. Just listen to the lyrics and you find out that thats the main subject. I wasn´t an opinion. (Electric Storm89 04:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC))

чего?

Я не понимаю, что вы говорите мне. Мой английский оставляет желать лучшего, пожалуйста, ответьте мне на другом языке. Soda-POP 04:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Can You Please

I know you only want wikipedia to be correct but you can do without the long pointless hate speak like someone did something illegal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.20.80.18 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 12 February 2007

Joie

Hi, i'm not sure how do nominate a page for deletion, but the Joie page really needs to, it would be great if you could help :). Lillygirl 22:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The use of an award win to describe a subject.

I've been tracking the "xxx-award winning yyy" issue on a few articles now, and I see that it's practically futile to try to make it any other way, unless we get the WikiProject Biography to help us. Every pop-culture related biography is written in that form. --w^{L<speak·check·chill>} 07:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

In regards to the Tila Tequila article, I think the issue has became much worse in regards to NPOV. I'm off the brink of an edit war about using the word bisexual in the first sentence of the lead, ie. Subject is a bisexual person who does a certain occupation" --w^{L<speak·check·chill>} 23:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

It's gotten so bad that it's hillarious. Care to collaborate on an essay to explain the effects of this? --w^{L<speak·check>} 08:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Say It Right

Looks like you have a new project ahead of you, then. Start with "Irreplaceable" and work your way backwards. :) - Musiclover 06:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Style question

I just noticed your edit on Call Me When You're Sober, where you converted all the numbers from numeral to written-out format. I have to ask why this was done...numbers over ten are acceptable as numerals in any circumstance. The MoS only says you are allowed to write them out if they are only two words, not that you must. I find your changes...curious. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 18:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words, I appreciate them! I am not going to revert, I was just curious because I've never seen such a guideline before. Thanks for the reply. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 00:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Extraordinay

Sorry you are wrong, when i song is released even over the net, it is officially getting airplay. It already has a promo image and has gotten radio play so you are wrong. Parys 21:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

You are wrong, the single has not been COMMERICALLY released and the promotional image is realParys 15:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Response to With Love (song) and quotation marks

I responded on my talk page, I wrote this:

:Sorry, my mistake. I should have paid more attention.

I was doing some cleaning up of articles at the time. As I said above, I should have paid more attention to the quotes. Acalamari 21:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I'd Like To

Thanks for the information on the images thing as I've noticed them thoughout other articles and believed them to be OK. Does that mean you cannot put them under an "alternative covers" section then?

Thanks for your time

[1] TopopMAC1 23:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the information, it's been an issue that has confused be for a while, even after reading the guidelines.

There are multiple single covers for Corrine's other singles... some are in a gallery whereas others are in "alternative single covers"... I was wondering if the covers that are in the "alternative single covers" section are valid and if that is the case, whether the "I'd Like To" images could be added to a similar section in that article!

Thanks again for your time.

TopopMAC1 20:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Dignity (album)

My Bad! QuasyBoy 23:19, 22 February 2007

U+ ur hand

first that you he is not a specialized critic and you also need to place information in what you are saying.

billboard places yes peak of digital musics. If you do not have login of the site I'm so sorry —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hookerj (talk • contribs) 02:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

hey please see the new links... and pages of billboard about pink again...

and revert again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hookerj (talk • contribs) 01:42, 3 March 2007.

Mariah Carey FAR

It has been suggested at the FAR that the endorsements section and the DJ Clue calim are cut from the article. Are you ok with this? Otherwise the review can be closed, the article is well within criteria imo. Ceoil 20:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 21:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}

KaDee Strickland article

Found it after watching the pilot of The Wedding Bells. Enjoyed your article quite a bit! Best wishes. BambangP 12:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Date formats

Thanks for the feedback on my talk page about dates. I'm relatively new to WP and am still on the learning curve. Is there a standard format that we're supposed to use? I'm guessing that your comment was prompted by dates I added to reviews in album infoboxes. I was doing this work as part of the Album Project and on the project page, it says to use the date of the review as the label for the link, but says nothing about the format. When I solicited guidance on the project talk page about what format to use, I was first told that it hadn't been discussed. Then someone suggested using mm/dd/yy format for American albums and the dd/mm/yy format for others (I thought this would make things even more confusing and decided to ignore this suggestion). Then someone suggested using dd-Mmm-yy, where Mmm is the first three letters of the month. After that, I started using that format. Sanfranman59 00:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Who Knew

this single flop on the Billboard hot 100, by the way the sales charts like Digital songs can be posted...

I am not obliged to dicutir with you what he must be postado, because I already I had even written in the description before.

revert your cuting...i'm tired...you do what u want... fuck other people editions...ok...edit the pink singles by ur way.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hookerj (talk • contribs) 18:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC).

oh yeah!! why u don't clean-up the x-tina's back to basics page?? this page have a god job for u —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hookerj (talk • contribs) 23:45, 21 March 2007.

yes! but the page of back to basics possesss one table of singles that in the page of I'm Not Dead you simple destroyed. I think that you are making a mistake in destroying tables of the I'm Not Dead and not in back to basics. why the page of I'm Not Dead cannot have photos of singles as in back you basics?

absurd!!!! if you buy or not i don't care and other editors too, i have b2b but i don't ditroy the page of the album like u —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hookerj (talk • contribs) 00:59, 23 March 2007.

Re:Component chart

Cool, thanks for letting me know, i got a bit confused. Lillygirl 14:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi sorry to bug you agian, but i was wondering if the UK Download chart and Australian digital track chart were counted as component charts, I tried to remove them they keep getting added back again. Lillygirl 23:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Timbaland & Danja

Dude, what's wrong with that article? They might as well be a production duo. Hell, they've produced songs together like they're The Neptunes or somethin'. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cameron Green (talk • contribs) 16:03, 25 March 2007.

Love. Angel. Music. Baby.

Love. Angel. Music. Baby. is currently a FAC, and several of the reviewers have stated that there's some POV in the article. I can't seem to find any, but my guess is that it's because I wrote nearly the entire article and have worked with it too much to judge neutrally. I need someone who hasn't worked with the article before to remove any traces of POV from the article; would you be willing to help do that? ShadowHalo 23:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

On a separate note, I deleted an unsourced image (probably fake) that Viven2 (talk · contribs · logs) uploaded and added to the 4 in the Morning article. I noticed the Gone Going (song) AfD and took a look at the user's contributions. I have a feeling this may be a sockpuppet. Take a look at Gwenboy (talk · contribs · logs); you'll notice many of his contributions included adding Africa/Iceland singles to articles, a rather unlikely place to release a single. Based on this edit by Viven2, I have a feeling they may be the same user. Any ideas? ShadowHalo 07:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks and question

Howdy.... thanks very much for chiming in on this, I really appreciate it. I see now that it has been archived. Do you have any idea what this means? I have a feeling that with the amount of archived incidents that it is now in a permanent black hole and no one will ever investigate it. I've reverted some retarded TRL stuff from discography pages by that user (users?) so I have a suspicion my involvement with him is not finished. Any advice on how to recall someone's attention to it? What's your past experience with the incidents page? - eo 20:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Haters (Hilary Duff song)

On 28 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Haters (Hilary Duff song), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 23:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Need You EM!

We currently seem to be having an issue with User_talk:Nwdavis. On the page Madonna discography, the user has deleted the warning boxes in the text to not shift albums around, this being, putting Madonna's I'm Breathless soundtrack into the album category since Madonna herself has stated, it's a soundtrack, not a "Madonna" album. This user has been warned by three different members now, and insists on overriding the warnings anyway. Could you please do something about this user so we may resolve this? I would be most appreciative. Herewego123 19:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Rihanna's third album -> Good Girl Gone Bad

Just to let you know that it is called "Good Girl Gone Bad", according to her official website. Steveweiser 22:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Amy Winehouse - "In My Bed / You Sent Me Flying"

I was wondering why you had moved "In My Bed / You Sent Me Flying" to just "In My Bed" as a song when it is actually a double A-side single. There are MANY articles accross Wikipedia about double A-side singles and it makes more sense to have the articles combined instead of there being two seperate articles containing similar information. I'd be very grateful of an explanation, thank you! TopopMAC1 01:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Here's a smile for you.

QuasyBoy has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

We have had our problems in the past, so here is a smile just so there is no ill will between us. QuasyBoy 11:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Not yet, Getting it the first day it's released. Duff-Head forever baby. QuasyBoy 23:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah. QuasyBoy 12:13 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Wikilinks in album articles

My reason for removing links to song articles that I have is because they weren't singles from that album, and the links to those songs might be on the article about the original studio album.

Thanks

86.3.175.191

They shall never be removed again if you don't like it.

86.3.175.191

Help With A Possible Sockpuppet

There's still fighting going on regarding Madonna's Discography and "I'm Breathless" being a soundtrack. Now we have a user who just created a name an hour ago: User:BreathlessNotASoundtrack. Could you please tell us what to do? Thanks. Herewego123 12:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Enjoy!

Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trampton 06:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC).

Crowd Control

Excuse me, but I work with their record labels. I was sent the song and I was told a video would be shot for it in 2007. Please don't redirect that page again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liloallen19 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC).

Yes I understand now. And I think info will be released on it in May. It'll either be released on a rerelease for Justin or on one if his b-sides. I was told the song won't be on an album, so I have no clue what that means. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liloallen19 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 9 April 2007.

Re: Mariah Carey

I know I didn't need to, but I just did it to look neater. I'm sort of perfectionist. lol As for the pop thing, you're welcome. By the way, it's none of my business but I think your user page and your talk page have been vandalised, haven't they? Funk Junkie 22:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's quite stressful! I've been trying to relax too. I mean, in real life, because it's difficult in Wikipedia! Oh, right... Never met anyone who vandalised their own user page, but you must have your reasons. So, you fancy that guy in your psychology class, huh? ;-) Funk Junkie 22:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

lol What does he look like? Funk Junkie 22:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Yummy. I'd also feel this way for someone like this. Funk Junkie 22:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Are you afraid he may prefer me to you? :P Funk Junkie 22:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

You should, because I'm just too bootylicious. ;) OK, we're just about to go too far. lol Funk Junkie 22:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

If there's no such thing as too far, I must confess I'm a naughty girl. I MEAN, a naughty boy. Funk Junkie 22:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

But I'm not ready to make it nice. As for my milkshake, it will bring Channing Tatum to the year and we'll go deep all nite until the early light. It gets him sooo excited. And it'd make me go 'awww baby'. Funk Junkie 23:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Dsicography

the reason why i took that "featuring" info off is because the box is specifically for song names, by adding featuring info it makes the boxes bigger and extended, there is no reason to have that info on because it can also be found inside the main song articles 24.91.135.228 23:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

List of best-selling albums worldwide

You recently protected the Madonna Discography page from the rampant changes due to difference of opinion. I would appreciate your opinion on a similar issue I am having on List of best-selling albums worldwide. I have assisted and maintained this page for over 12 months ensuring that the data is referenced and as accurate as possible. Now I have a User UberCryxic who is continually changing the data, and not accepting any data provided. His main arguement is that this is "claims", so as long as referenced, it meets the critea (which is actually a true statement). But I dispute the links as not being as accurate, as reliable, as credible as those that already existed. I am asking you as an administrator, are you able to assist? Or is there a process that needs to occur before an Administrator takes command. 60.234.242.196 00:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

The link provided was a CNN transcript. This seems fairly reputable and news transcripts have been used in other similar articles. The main worry I have with what this user is trying to do is that he/she ia talking about "accuracy" and other such things relating to, well, truth. But Wikipedia does not take a stand on what is true or what is not. This is especially true for the article above, which conveys information that's not even widely reported. It just basically goes on claims. One or two claims for a certain number is basically the standard that applies when using a figure. Again, for this article only. As an experienced user in that article, the anon should be aware of this fact.UberCryxic 01:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

FUCK U!

SHUT THE FUCK UP BITCH U DONT KNOW ME SO I SUGGEST U KEEP UR FUCKIN MOUTH SHUT AND MIND UR OWN BUSINESS U DAMN NERD. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by King1992 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 10 April 2007.

I AINT G0TTA DO SHIT AND FUCK WIKIPEDIA YALL WEAK MOTHER FUCKERS GET UR INFO RIGHT AND LOCK ALL UR SHIT CUZ YOUR INFO IS ALL WRONG SO SUCK MY DICK AND FUCK U BITCH AND MIND UR BUSINESS OR U CAN SUCK MY DICK OR KISS MY ASS! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by King1992 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC).

Gypsy Woman

You are right, I didn't check the history and considered it "just a song", and album tracks by notable artists are generally considered not notable (hence the interpretation of A7). Your version did clearly assert notability: perhaps it is better merged anyway, but a speedy delete was wrong. I have restored the article and then put your last version again as the good one instead of the redirect. My apologies for this, and thanks for the civil explanation. Fram 19:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but

Yes, but the songs I redirected were not big enough to have their own articles. In fact maybe The Getaway shouldn't have it's own article because lack of interest and not very much on it. Supergirl on the other end has charted, whereas The Getaway did not. Plus, the other articles aren't big enough to have their own articles. Especially Dignity. I can see Gypsy Woman because of all the controversy, but seriously, do we need those extra pages about those songs? There's really nothing there. We can just make the Dignity album page longer by adding a spot that summarizes what was in those other pages. Extraordinary Machine, seriously: I don't need you telling me what I can't and can do. I know what I'm doing. We can keep the I Am page because it was a huge Radio Disney single. Well, please write back on thoughts and concerns. Tcatron565 23:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Supergirl charted in iTunes and I Am was played more than any other Radio Disney single from Hilary Duff. Plus, Gypsy Woman is a rumored 4th single. Now, I don't have a problem against that page. Just keepGypsy oman. But, please, not Dignity. There's not much info for Dignity. There's is more for Gypsy Woman. Tcatron565 00:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)