Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. , SqueakBox 15:13, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

I see this page is being marked for deletion :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamit_Company

I made a page for this company , just like others already exist in Wikipedia :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutelsat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard

I do not see why is this wrong ?

Could you please explain ?

Writing Corporate Pages edit

Plus : please explain this : " It's a Romanian company, and its page sponsor may be unfamiliar for Wikipedia corporate page style"

Expertu, the article, as you wrote it, was very promotional. If you want to create Wikipedia articles about companies, I suggest you (1) state the facts, without trying to promote the product, (2) provide the basis for creating an article. In order to survive a Vote for deletion the company has to be noteworthy in some way. You can provide evidence that a company is noteworthy many different ways, for instance, by stating how may customers it has, what makes it unique, or what awards it has won.

My vote for Lamit Company is currently delete. As an inclusionist, I would like to change my vote to keep, but could you please take a more friendly tone towards me, and try to add some of the factual details I am requesting? If the company is in business and has more than 1000 customers (or however many), just say so in the article, and that will help people to understand.

For instance, the following statement is factual, and provides a basis for keeping the article: "Lamit company provides satellite Internet service to thousands of customers in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Without Lamit, these customers would have no other economical access to Broadband Internet service."

The following is purely promotional, and will be deleted: "Lamit provides excellent Internet service for less money than all its competitors."

If you stick to the facts, and avoid hype, you're going to get a much better result for your company. Best wishes, Jehochman 07:51, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

About your words. edit

I do not have to re-choose my tone towards you.

What you actually said, is wrongfull, and not based on any evidence.

But... What i can do, is learn from the kind explanation you gave me, about corporate pages.

In 1-2 days maximum, i'll rewrite this article.

Thank you for your time and efforts, to make me understand.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lamitco logo.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lamitco logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepstash (July 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Expertu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepstash (October 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 14:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Deepstash edit

  Hello, Expertu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deepstash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply