Erwan1972
Welcome
edit
|
March 2011
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Martin Hirsch, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Martin Hirsch, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
editYour name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Erwan1972 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- As you can see from the linked case above, the results were inconclusive; since your history is so much different than the other 5 accounts, I'm assuming you aren't the same person. I remain puzzled by the reverts you made at Martin Hirsch, but that in itself isn't conclusive. When you return and read all this, let me know if I can explain anything further. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
- i'm very suprised to be under a Sockpuppetry suspicion. Supprised that confirmed an information on wiki english page on a french people by a french creates a such problem !
- For futur, i confirmed as i have explain on french user page that i have not another account, but a have a share Ip connection (if a check match).
- best regards
- Erwan1972 (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Invitation
editHi Erwan1972. Thank you for your editing at Forces on sails. As discussed there, I am proposing to re-organize the article, using much of the existing material, in order to make the article more accessible. I hope that you will participate. So, I invite you to follow the sandbox page where the reorganization is being drafted. I suggest making comments on that effort at Talk:Forces on sails#Reorganization?. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 15:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I invite you to look at the discussion at Talk:Forces on sails#Expert attention and elsewhere in the Talk page, which I have just tied to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sailing. There are two parallel efforts, one in the main article and one in the sandbox. It appears that the two editors are unlikely to reach a consensus as to which approach is more appropriate to WP:MOS. It would help, if other editors would look at both efforts and comment at the Reorganization? section. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 00:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)