Enemyusuar

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Club Tijuana, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Shanghai Transrapid

Hello Enemyusuar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shanghai Transrapid, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Linking years

I reverted your edit to Cancún because the Manual of Style (at WP:YEARLINK) says, "Year articles (1795, 1955, 2007) should not be linked unless they contain information that is germane and topical to the subject matter—that is, the events in the year article should share an important connection other than merely that they occurred in the same year." -- Donald Albury 11:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! W. D. Graham 16:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Day of the Dead

I am not sure why you changed Day of the Dead to "Day of the Deads". It seems ungramatical and nonsensical. I Googled it and found that a few people do use the this phrase but it is not very common. Almost all books and scholars use the more normal phrase "Day of the Dead". I have changed it back. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

You have now moved the article Day of the Dead to Day of the Deads three times. Please be aware of our rules about WP:Edit warring. If you don't slow down and wait for consensus about this, you may be sanctioned. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

After reading your comment on my talk page I can see that you genuinely believe that "Day of the Deads" is a correct translation. You need to understand that you are mistaken and that it is not your decision to make anyway. When books and scholars translate it as "Day of the Dead" we have to go along with this whether we agree or not. You are welcome to discuss it further on the article's talk page but please do not move it again without agreement from several other people. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Adding letters

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did to Mexico City you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 2.216.191.10 (talk) 09:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Also to add, you made four additions to the Mexico City article in total. In addition to that, you made some nonsense edits in addition to the vandalism and the defamatory content that you added to some articles. Some edits contain inappropriate words, and some of them have been vandalized by putting offensive words. We take edits with offensive words very seriously, if you add any defamatory content again, you may be blocked from editing by an administrator. This is your only warning, if you don't want to be blocked from editing, please look at Wikipedia:Harassment. Thank you. 2.216.191.10 (talk) 09:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Mexico

I have replied to you on my userpage. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 02:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Enemyusuar, you need to discuss this on the Mexican talk page - and not engage in edit warring over content you wish to change as you have done. Also, this [1] is a misuse of edit summaries by labelling an edit you were reverting as vandalism when it was clearly not. Please start a civilised discussion promptly. --Τασουλα (talk) 18:27, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Enemyusuar: you are resuming your edit war by re-adding repeated pictures also by adding empty headers (sections) to the article. That's plainly vandalic and disruptive. Several users have reverted you in the past days. You're attitude is risking a block. You must be civilized and willing to cooperate. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 07:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mexico. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 23:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Mexico. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mexico City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crónica (newspaper) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

important updates at Messi's page

there is important discussion about messi's page at [footbal]

the discussion about :

1-adding back the assists which have been removed ( and i think its really important ) especially most notable players have it and even less known player than messi have this statistics which is important for any striker .(remember the debate about messi vs ronalod have lots about messi makes more assists than ronaldo )

2-adding back the youth and under -23 goals because they are different statistics from senior one and u cant merge them together . since fifa themself separate them differently .

3-about the table of messi goals and if its important info or just long statistics(useless one).

Thank you all . adnan^{talk 12 pm 16 october 2012 (UTC)}

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gamesa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Primera Division

Tuxtla Gutiérrez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to PRI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gamesa without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Mexico City. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mexico City shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Mexico City, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:15, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. I noticed that you recently removed/changed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. It helps other editors understand the changes you made. Cheers. ComputerJA (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! ComputerJA (talk) 17:50, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page One World Trade Center. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:42, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Non-standard quotation marks

Do not replace quotation marks doubled angle brackets «», as you did in this edit of Day of the Dead. This is the english Wikipedia and we follow english language punctuation conventions - the double angle brackets as quotation marks are specific to spanish and specific to quoting actual speech, not merely as differentiators. Please clean up edits where you have done so. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced/NPOV edits, etc

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to 2012 World Football Challenge does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Real Madrid C.F. does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Stop adding that terrible exterior photo. A photo of the pitch is preferred. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Real Madrid C.F. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The explanation of why your preferred image is not to be used. Opportunity to give a reason has been given to you. You are not editing in a cooperative or productive way. Please change that behaviour. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madrid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTBA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sport in Mexico, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 20:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

• I have no idea what you're trying to pull on Odiongan, Romblon, but it's certainly not helpful. Drmies (talk) 22:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Favonian (talk) 07:22, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Liga MX logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Liga MX logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 03:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:College athletics (track and field) venues in Mexico

Category:College athletics (track and field) venues in Mexico, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 16:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)