User talk:Emijrp/2014

Archive: 2005 - 2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - See current talks here

دمشق

Hola Emijrp, hay un pequeño debate el Café de esWiki sobre la conveniencia de mantener redirecciones en alfabetos distintos al latino, como por ejemplo la entrada es:دمشق que creó tu BOTijo, u otras en alfabeto ruso, japonés, hebreo, etc. No alcanzamos a ver qué utilidad tienen, dado sobre todo el muy escaso número de usuarios y el alto coste de mantenimiento: pocos editores activos leen estos alfabetos, hay que cambiar de una wiki a otra para hacer las comprobaciones de que no haya gamberrismo y esté bien direccionada... Como parece que has creado entradas de estas de manera automatizada, ¿tienes algo que aportar sobre su utilidad y razón de ser? Un saludo. PD. Si pudieres responder en esWiki o en el Café, te lo agradecería. Saludos. --Zaryabak (talk) 17:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion for List of films featuring prisons

Hi Emilio. Just wondering if documentaries about prisons are allowed on the page or not. If they are, then I suggest adding this precious documentary called Prison Ball about prison basketball and prison basketball leagues. But I am hesitating about it before making sure that documentaries can be added at least under a separate sub-heading on the page. And here's a great prison song called "Prison Song" by Graham Nash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuxrghV6m0c I dedicate to you since I discovered this page that you created -- werldwayd (talk) 19:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello Werldwayd. I think that you can add documentaries too, as you said, a subsection would be enough. If in the future the list is very long, it can be split. Thanks for your edits! emijrp (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Now I've added a section for documentaries. I also added Escape from Alcatraz, a very famous film. werldwayd (talk) 22:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Al-Captain

The article Al-Captain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be a defunct Sudanese newspaper of no notability. The links to the newspaper do not function either.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Charlotte Wolff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Wolff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Wolff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   22:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Random question

Seeing as it has been over two years since this page was updated, do you think you could have the bot run and update it in your spare time? Thanks, and I look forward to hearing back from you! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Archives wiki

Do you want to put something about your Wiki-rescue on Archives wiki [1] to go with the other Internet archives? Jackiespeel (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Sure, just open a page for WikiTeam and I will fill it with some bits. Nice wiki, congrats, I didn't know it (only this one). I'm working in List of archives, trying to cover all the world, but many countries are hard to expand because there are very few useful results in Google. emijrp (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Will do.

The problem with the Wikiverse - not enough maps and guides (like [2]) to find what is of interest. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Will [3] do for starters? Jackiespeel (talk) 16:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, nice. :-) emijrp (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I am of the 'rubber band ball tendency' - start a basic item and let others add to it. :)

Care to transfer [4] with relevant translation requests over to WP? Jackiespeel (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Create it here and I will fix the templates and so :-) emijrp (talk) 10:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Done (and the library as well). Jackiespeel (talk) 16:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Wow, so cool National Archives of the Faroe Islands and National Library of the Faroe Islands have been expanded by others! emijrp (talk) 09:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

WP:Categorization and WP:See also

Are both clear- Don't create redlinks. I am therefore removing links to nonexistent categories and redlinks in See also sections of the list of museum articles you are creating....William 19:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Nazario Chávez Aliaga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazario Chávez Aliaga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazario Chávez Aliaga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alex (talk) 05:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

wmcharts

Hi, some of the wmcharts haven't been working for some time (just shows a blank page), including the gender gap charts. Have you looked into getting them back online? And do you have plans for migrating to Tool Labs? I could help with the migration if you want, but right now it seems like bug 58196 is a blocker. – Danmichaelo (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

I have to move my tools to Labs. I'm not sure when I will do it, because I'm busy and have to explore how to migrate. But I have all my code in a SVN, so it won't be lost. I'm ok if you want to import it to your Labs account... emijrp (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Catalan culture Challenge

Hello Emilio! I've seen that you are one of the main editors of the Caterina Albert article and I just want to inform you that the article is featured at the the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. It goes from March 16 to April 15. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). It would be lovely to have you on board. Vengaaa di que sí!  :-) Amical Wikimedia --Kippelboy (talk) 07:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Also, if you're creating/translating more bio-articles, I wonder whether you might not want to install the range-dash script, which is just a button press to get the right – typography for the initial dates of the person. Please ask me if you want to install it and I'll show you.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 09:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

prevent Universal access to all knowledge from merging to Internet Archive

Hi, There is a discussion about merging the article:Universal access to all knowledge to article:Internet Archive at Talk:Universal access to all knowledge . I don't agree with it. I think that you are interested to the subject: "access to knowledge". I request you that help me to prevent Universal access to all knowledge from merging to another articles.DZTREQWS (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

removal

I removed it because it was out of date and it was better to just link to the main article which is accurate, rather than deal with multiple splits. --Львівське (говорити) 08:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zbigniew Batko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zbigniew Batko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:58, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I was going through the Orphanage (April 2012) and I came across a host of microbiographies, all created by you and all carrying only name, dates, occupation and an {{expand}} tag. Before I nominate them all for deletion, do these serve any purpose? They don't have inlinks, they haven't been expanded and the information in them can be recreated easily. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gildas Jaffrennou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gildas Jaffrennou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Inés Rodena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inés Rodena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inés Rodena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 12:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Ines Rodena

HI,

Ines Rodena is family. My mom was raised by Ines. I wanted to just simply ask where you obtained your knowledge of her work and why you were inclined to start her page?

The Wikipedia page you created for her is at risk of being deleted and I would like to keep it up and going.

Thank you for you time

179.111.75.159 (talk) 13:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello. I just was searching biographies to create, and I saw es:Inés Rodena in Spanish Wikipedia, and I started a very small article here. Then other users translated most of it into English and now it is big. I think that it will be keep because now it is more expanded, but you can help adding references (links to websites, books, etc, that talk about her). Regards. emijrp (talk) 19:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gustavo de la Colina y Rojo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gustavo de la Colina y Rojo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Violence against men

Category:Violence against men, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. jps (talk) 20:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Bot flag on frwiki

Hello,

As a bureaucrat on frwiki, I was checking the activity of the bots, and noticed that yours had been inactive for at least 6 months. It is not reasonable that an unmonitored account keeps a bot flag, as it may be more easily hacked. Do you wish to keep the bot flag? If this is the case, please tell me so (preferably on my talk page on frwiki, otherwise on my talk page on this project). Without any answer from you, the bot flag will be removed in one month.

Thank you for your comprehension, Litlok (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

I asked you about one month ago if you wanted to keep the bot flag of your bot on frwiki, but (maybe I have missed something) it seems you have not answered yet. Well, it's summer time... so you still have another month to respond :-) Litlok (talk) 22:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer; I've removed the bot flag. Litlok (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Corea del Norte listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Corea del Norte. Since you had some involvement with the Corea del Norte redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 07:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

List of museums in Cuba

Hi there. I have reverted your edits to List of museums in Cuba, as I believe the policy for lists like this should only include entries that have their own Wikipedia article (therefore in theory proving their notability). The only exception to this might be if a source is provided proving the notability of that entry. I see you are an experienced Wikipedia editor, so apologies if this is not Wikipedia policy (I get lost sometimes), but if not, what is?. - Bleaney (talk) 17:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of websites with country access restrictions

The article List of websites with country access restrictions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is incomplete, there are millions of sites are blocked in many countries. It will take 300 pagest to list of them.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yacatisma (talk) 06:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

I removed the speedy deletion proposal because the rationale was obviously wrong. — Yerpo ^Eh? 08:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

New page 2014

Hi, you have a message on my page. Isa--213.89.100.74 (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ludwik Ehrlich

The article Ludwik Ehrlich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This unreferenced stub has been there a long time without development. It is a TNT case. When someone is ready to 'really' write this article they can do it and they will not lose any time for the disapperance of this 'one.sentence' text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Miguel Laurencena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miguel Laurencena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Laurencena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kevin McE (talk) 20:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your article Archivo General de la Nación de República Dominicana

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Archivo General de la Nación de República Dominicana to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. WaggersTALK 13:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucien Loizeau

The article Lucien Loizeau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stubbed since 2012, no indication of notability or relevance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Love Monuments statistics

Hi! Please, renew statistics - http://tools.wmflabs.org/wlm-stats/ ! Ukraine is on the first place, not on the third, and Russia go higher (contest in Russia will continue till to end of October). Look at this - http://wikizabytki.pl/stats/ Thanks for excellent yours statistics! ;-) --Nickispeaki (talk) 21:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Can you check this please? The last contition is 2014-10-10. We have contest till 2014-10-31. This is only tool to check Macedonian results. Tnx--R ašo 17:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

I have added October to the analysis. Regards! emijrp (talk) 18:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Problem with the statistics for WLM

Hello Emilio. I am the organizier of Wiki Loves Monuments for Macedonia and we are one of the countries that has started it at a later date (it lasts whole October) and I am regularly checking the upload count. I was referred to you by Romaine regarding a problem that I see with the statistics on the stats tool, who seem to have stopped counting about a week ago and simply do not update any new uploads. This can be seen by the number of images it shows for Macedonia, as opposed to what is shown in this category, where uploads are placed by the competition upload form, and it is obvious that the number is much higher. Is there are way to resolve this? Our success as a chapter for this project is to be measured by the number of uploads (beside the usage criterion) and I thought that we should have a valid statistic on this page to reflect the actual situation. Thank you a lot for your time. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 18:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

It must be fixed now. emijrp (talk) 18:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it is. Thank you very much! --B. Jankuloski (talk) 23:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Great! ;-) But! Where is Russia? ;-0 Please add Russia to list of countries! :-)--Nickispeaki (talk) 07:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The same question - Russia. --Nickispeaki (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot Russia. Now it is added. emijrp (talk) 10:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arsène Lejeune

The article Arsène Lejeune has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pretty useless and the French article is also unsourced, apart from a mention of a 1933 autobiography. Suggests non-notability and possible genealogical research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 23:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles Coquelin

The article Charles Coquelin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has not been expanded or sourced in 2 1/2 years so I have concerns it won't be. As is, simply existing is nn.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Postcard Cathy (talk) 07:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Urgent request for adding a submitted translation before a Wikimedia conference

Hello, Emijrp. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

A cookie for you!

Amazing article :) Danielt998 (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)