Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorge Iván del Valle (September 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 12:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ElSileciodeLasVoces! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 12:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jorge Iván del Valle edit

  Hello, ElSileciodeLasVoces. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jorge Iván del Valle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jorge Iván del Valle edit

 

Hello, ElSileciodeLasVoces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jorge Iván del Valle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sidssy for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidssy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidssy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Renzo García edit

Hello, ElSileciodeLasVoces, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Rkieferbaum, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Renzo García, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renzo García.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rkieferbaum}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply