Welcome!

Hello, EdgarYLeon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 03:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Ways to improve Back to Beautiful

edit

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. EdgarYLeon, thanks for creating Back to Beautiful!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PRNewswire is an aggregator of press releases, and is not an independent, reliable source. The article reads like a promo piece.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ross Lynch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Love Christmas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2017

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sabrina Carpenter, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

You must give attributions when copying content from another article WP:CWW, process is simple, use edit history on source and destination of copy and say what you are doing, where content went and where it came from. Also that particular content split needs to be discussed. Start a discussion on the talk page, get consensus, or at least no objection after a week or so, before doing a split. This should be done for any split of content. See process at WP:SPLIT specifically § How to properly split an article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
It was discussed, at Talk:Sabrina Carpenter#Attempted WP:SPLIT of Discography back in May 2015. I don't see that anything has changed in the intervening two years to justify a SPLIT. At the very least, yes, it should be discussed on the Talk page to gauge if there is support for splitting... --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
And, of course, the discography as currently done violates WP:ACCESSIBILITY with unnecessary and inappropriate use of 'rowspan' in tables (as per WP:DTT). I'd certainly oppose splitting it until those issues are fixed. --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Victoria Justice, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Martin Johnson and Some Nights. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2017

edit

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Sofia Carson.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --IJBall (contribstalk) 23:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Descendants 2, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

See above about copying content without attributions - it is a WP:COPYVIO as well as wikipedia terms of use require attribution for content and it is not your original content. If you wish to do a split, do it with discussion, get concensus and do it properly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Descendants 2: Original TV Movie Soundtrack.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. See WP:CWW and propose a WP:SPLIT on source article talk page if and get concensus Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Descendants 2, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Descendants 2. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply