Your submission at Articles for creation: Senior Year (August 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bilorv(c)(talk) 17:08, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dominickbrown0! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bilorv(c)(talk) 17:08, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Senior Year

edit
 

Hello, Dominickbrown0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Senior Year".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:05, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Daniel Quinlan. Your recent edit to the page Greg Roman appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

You may also want to read MOS:REPEATLINK. Linking every use of a term isn't necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

bro how is NFL.com not a reliable source Dominickbrown0 (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply