Djhuff

About

Since approximately 2012, I've written Wikipedia articles, for companies and individuals who meet Wikipedia notability guidelines, on a "for fee" basis.

I did not disclose my paid contributor status until Feb. 2014 when a notice appeared on Wikipedia about paid contributors. I posted my status here in my About section. However, I didn't sign it because I didn't think I needed to, this being my Talk page and all.

Double unfortunately, I did not keep up with the paid contributor discussion nor read the guidelines and thus did not disclose on the articles I wrote or edited that I was a paid contributor.

On 4/29/2015, after being instructed to do so, I added a Disclosure notice to the pages to which I made contributions or created.

This entire process has actually been an awesome learning experience. I've learned that being nice means people are helpful and nice back. I've also learned more about the Wikipedia community and how it works and thinks.

If I were to do anything here that's constructive and to atone for my actions, I'd help create user-friendly guides on how to use Wikipedia. The reason I helped so many companies / individuals create their articles is because the instructions and rules are quite convoluted. You can spend hours trying to figure out how to do one thing. Wikipedia needs less "hurt my brain" and more "Ok, now I see how it works." Djhuff (talk) 23:37, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Nancy Lee Gossels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Column Technologies

I was glad to see that you'd greatly improved the article Column Technologies since I'd removed it. However, I noticed that you removed the {{orphan}} template, while the article remains an orphan, per WP:ORPHAN. Please do not remove maintenance templates unless the issue they correspond to has been addressed. Thank you. Rutebega (talk) 01:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

I linked two pages to the Column Technologies page and removed the maintenance template as I have now addressed the orphan issue. Thank you for calling it to my attention. Djhuff 16:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Southern African Music Rights Organisation, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Melmann^(talk) 12:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Melmann -- I apologize for the mistake on the SAMRO page. Can you tell me how I remove that page from my user sandbox? I want to create a new page. [[user:djhuff|djhuff]

Talkback

Hello, Djhuff. You have new messages at Melmann's talk page.
Message added 12:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Melmann^(talk) 12:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Gregory D. Hague Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gregory D. Hague Photo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 17:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harvey Mackay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mt. Pleasant and Central High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harvey Mackay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Disclosure required

Since 2013 you have almost exclusively created or greatly expanded articles on many businesses and people associated with those businesses, including Cloudred, Michael Stelzner/Social Media Examiner, C. Peter R. Gossels, Harvey Mackay, Sealevel Systems, Restaurantware, InsureMyTrip.com/James N. Grace, Gregory D. Hague, Healthline, Southern African Music Rights Organisation, Cabot Corporation, and Column Technologies. This might lead an editor to conclude you have some kind of undisclosed financial connection to these entities. If you do, you must disclose the connection under Wikipedia's Terms of Service as described at WP:COI. — Brianhe (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Brianhe (talk)

Yes, I have been paid by various entities to write their pages, although I've also written a few on my own. I do take Wikipedia and its mission seriously and have endeavored to always create pages that meet notability requirements and that educate people about the topic. I'm happy to add a disclosure. Do I add this to my user page?

Djhuff (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Brianhe (talk)

How would you like me to respond on notice board?

Djhuff (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

My thoughts on this align with Jimmy Wales' "bright line" preference as expressed here. — Brianhe (talk) 00:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Actually, I did disclose myself some time ago. It's right at the top of this page. -- Djhuff (talk) 02:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of James N. Grace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James N. Grace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James N. Grace until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

COI Notice

Per your disclosure here, you are a paid editor and are not complying with Wikipedia's terms of use nor with its COI guidelines. Please see the notice below.

Hello, Djhuff. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Two things:

• Please make the required disclosures for edits for which you have been paid.
• Please stop directly editing articles in mainspace where you have a COI but instead make edit requests on the Talk pages.

Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 11:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I have made all required disclosures on the respective talk pages.Djhuff (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for not making a lot of drama over this. I think you maybe missed a couple? Some other things:

• there is a sizable chunk of the community that thinks paid editing should be banned, but the community has been unable to come to any consensus over that. If you are not aware of how controversial paid editing is, please let me know, and i can inform you. The core of the issue is the tension between protecting the privacy of editors, and protecting the integrity of Wikipedia.
• since the community has not been able to ban paid editing, it is still permitted. We do our best manage COI but everything is voluntary. So again, I appreciate that you have not created drama.
• Here are things that would be great if you would do going forward.
  • Please declare your COI on your article draft. Disclosure is the key to managing COI.
  • Please submit your articles through the AfC process instead of creating them directly, so they can be reviewed for NPOV before they go live. This kind of review, is the 2nd key element in managing COI.
  • Please consider adding a declaration to your userpage, listing the articles you have created or edited for consideration

Finally, you may want to meet CorporateM, a long-term editor here who often edits for pay, and is very transparent about it.

Thanks again Jytdog (talk) 13:24, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

I've been following the debate about paid editing and when a notice appeared across all of Wikipedia last year about it, that is when I updated my Talk page to state I was a paid editor. I didn't realized I had done it out of order or that I had to sign it, seeing it was my own talk page. :-/

I know the community doesn't like it. I won't make excuses for doing it. I do want to say in my defense that I have always endeavored to create articles that met Wikipedia guidelines. I turn away more requests for articles than I actually write.

I'm happy to work with you on ensuring the pages I've created have disclosure notices and to explain any citations or research. I do respect Wikipedia and the community and while I have been paid for writing, I actually enjoy the process and the research and usually put in more time than what I'm paid for.

I don't intend on creating any new articles for fees for otherwise moving forward. Djhuff (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

That all makes sense. You will do as you will; in my view some of your editing is quite good, btw, where you had sufficient sources. (this is the problem with paid editing; quite often there is no article or only a stub b/c the subject really isn't NOTABLE and once an editor enters the game of creating something for pay, they have to do crap editing to create something - they cannot edit well due to lack of good sources) I hope you put your talents to use in WP where you don't have a conflict. anyway, good luck to you. Jytdog (talk) 14:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the nice words about some of my editing. Djhuff (talk) 14:07, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

you are welcome! and thanks again for being so reasonable and gracious. those are not common qualities. Jytdog (talk) 14:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Stelzner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Stelzner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Stelzner (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Stelzner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Stelzner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sealevel Systems for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sealevel Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sealevel Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Restaurantware for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Restaurantware is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restaurantware until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of InsureMyTrip.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InsureMyTrip.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsureMyTrip.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sealevel Systems

The article Sealevel Systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by a paid editor who had not properly disclosed themselves at the time of creation (they only properly disclosed on 29 April 2015).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Am I allowed to weigh in on this decision since you're posting this here or no? I'm happy to make the article better pending feedback. Djhuff (talk) 16:37, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

of course you are. it usually goes better if you acknowledge that you created the article for pay as opposed to someone else bringing it up. but be prepared for some cruel flack - people can be nasty to paid editors. if you conduct yourself there as you have with me, i am hopeful people will respond to you well. good luck. Jytdog (talk) 21:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I really appreciate how helpful you've been. Djhuff (talk) 22:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome! If you have any questions or want to discuss anything going forward, i'll be happy to. (i totally hear you on how hard it can be to figure this place out) Jytdog (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Read your Talk page. You are a true saint. :-D Djhuff (talk) 12:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:InsureMyTrip.com logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InsureMyTrip.com logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for Restaurantware.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Restaurantware.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086^Talk 03:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Column Technologies Corporate logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Column Technologies Corporate logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Healthline Networks Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Healthline Networks Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cloudred

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cloudred, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Light2021 (talk) 16:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Cloudred for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cloudred is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloudred until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 18:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cloudred logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cloudred logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)