You're welcome for messages Dj1508 (talk) 08:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dj1508 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been accused of sockpuppetry to be the same person as Ds303 and Dk353 on the basis of we all have similar user page with very minimal writing on it, for my case it is "Hi" only. I may have similar username and user page but I'm absolutely not related to those accounts and have no idea about them. I have been using Wikipedia for more than 3 years maintaining all the policies and will further do so. I would like to appeal my case and would request to recheck my account as I've absolutely no connection with the accounts mentioned and I believe I've not used my account abusively. Dj1508 (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

First, as it says quite explicitly at WP:CHECKME, we do not accept requests to recheck accounts. Second, I also find your statement that you "believe" you haven't used your account abusively to be, well, interesting. It makes me wonder if there's some things you've done that you think others might see as abusive. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Leaving Wikipedia after being here for more than 8 years in various ways. Wikipedia has become a toxic place and a place where editors who thinks they are the owner and know everything. Goodbye Wikipedia. Dj1508 (talk) 08:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC).Reply

New pages edit

For pages like WBFJA Lifetime Achievement Award, it is usually best to start a new section on the main page, as I did here, rather than create a new article. Such articles have to pass the notability test, which requires sufficient coverage in independent sources (i.e., not WBFJA website). Even if it does meet the notability guideline, it's usually best to cover on the main page unless the article has to be split for length reasons. Happy editing! buidhe 08:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Player of the Match awards (cricket), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 17 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zee Cine Award for Best Playback Singer – Male, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2021 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Redirects edit

Hello, Dj1508,

Before you take an existing article and turn it into a redirect, please discuss the idea on the article talk page. Otherwise, you can find yourself in the middle of an edit war. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Carlo Ancelotti, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 17:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of ICC Player of the Month for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ICC Player of the Month is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICC Player of the Month until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Joseph2302 (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:ICC Men's Player of the Month edit

 Template:ICC Men's Player of the Month has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:ICC Women's Player of the Month edit

 Template:ICC Women's Player of the Month has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

  Your edit to ICC Player of the Month has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. wjematherplease leave a message... 14:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ganguly–Durjoy Trophy for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ganguly–Durjoy Trophy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganguly–Durjoy Trophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 17 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 11 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded by Arijit Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freddy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 17 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West Bengal Film Journalists' Association Award for Best Male Playback Singer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Papon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 22:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dj1508 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been wrongly tagged as sockpuppeter and I have not violated any Wikipedia policy and the account that has been associated with me has no connection with me Dj1508 (talk) 10:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. Please address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dj1508. Yamla (talk) 12:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Leaving Wikipedia edit

Leaving Wikipedia after being here for more than 8 years in various ways. Wikipedia has become a toxic place and a place where editors who thinks they are the owner and knows everything. Goodbye Wikipedia. Dj1508 (talk) 08:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply