Your submission at Articles for creation: Godomiscient (January 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Deyrel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godomiscient (January 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Godomiscient

edit
 

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Godomiscient. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Godomiscient has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Godomiscient. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Godomiscient

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Godomiscient has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  ‑ Iridescent 11:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of User:Deyrel

edit
 

The page User:Deyrel has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  ‑ Iridescent 11:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please stop

edit

If you want to start a new religion, we are not the place to do it. We're an academic resource, not a web hosting service, and our sole purpose is to summarize what other sources have said about any given topic. Unless and until your religion is the subject of coverage in reliable sources, Wikipedia is not the place for it. ‑ Iridescent 11:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Deyrel

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Deyrel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 11:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   ‑ Iridescent 11:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (caught in the war between heaven and hell, pick a side, because one of the sides is about to get smoked) --Deyrel (talk) 11:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll take my chances. If you have something constructive to add to Wikipedia I'm more than happy to unblock you, but we have no interest in either a religion you've invented or your conspiracy theories about Elon Musk. ‑ Iridescent 11:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Enough is enough

edit

You've wasted enough of our time, and as such I've removed your ability to edit this talk page. In the unlikely event you actually feel you have something constructive to contribute to Wikipedia—and that does not include trying to get us to host your conspiracy theories—go to Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System and follow the instructions there. ‑ Iridescent 13:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply