User talk:Deor/Archive25
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Administrators' newsletter – July 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).
Administrator changes
28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • Floquenbeam1 • Flyguy649 • Fram2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
- 1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
- 2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
|
|
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment seeking to alleviate pressures on the request an account (ACC) process proposes either raising the account creation limit for extended confirmed editors or granting the account creator permission on request to new ACC tool users.
- In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
- The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
- The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
- A request for comment seeks to determine whether Wikipedia:Office actions should be a policy page or an information page.
Technical news
- The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.
Miscellaneous
- In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop Fram. This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.
Precious
small emendations
Thank you for quality articles such as Thomas Blackburn (entomologist), Cosmographia (Bernardus Silvestris) and Claude Houghton, for service from 2006, for "small emendations" such as geocoding of articles, for "all the cool kids were doing it, so ...", for giving "really useful, detailed, clear" answers at the Teahouse, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2244 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Kadleroshilik
You have walked the lands of Lefingwell and those before him? Bravo, I say, bravo! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathan Kaaihue (talk • contribs) 00:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Unicorns
You are correct the unicorn does refer to Pliny's use in the commented out section of Ancient History. It is rather perplexing and a continuing theme on wiki that reality is subjected to mythology and even when posted as mythology it is censored from public view. I would kindly ask that you consider fixing this trend. Jaded936 (talk) 17:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the page Wikipedia:Office actions has been changed from a policy page to an information page.
- A request for comment (permalink) is in progress regarding the administrator inactivity policy.
Arbitration
- Editors may now use the template {{Ds/aware}} to indicate that they are aware that discretionary sanctions are in force for a topic area, so it is unnecessary to alert them.
Miscellaneous
- Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
- The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.
Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.
The Anomebot2
After a hiatus, The Anomebot2 is now back on-line. I hope to be able to go back to running it monthly. -- The Anome (talk) 11:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muangthalang School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
draft: Government College bida
thanks for the help
Administrators' newsletter – September 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).
Administrator changes
Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
Floquenbeam • Lectonar- DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
- Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime
Technical news
- Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
- The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2019 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Miscellaneous
- A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.
Excellent
Hello Deor. Your creation of "a squabble of editors" is just wonderful. If An Exaltation of Larks added new items each year the way the OED does that would have to be included in future editions :-) Thanks for the smile and cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 23:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories
.
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
Technical news
- As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
Arbitration
- The 2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place October 4th to 10th.
- The arbitration case regarding Fram was closed. While there will be a local RfC
focus[ing] on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future
, there is currently a global community consultation on partial and temporary office actions in response to the incident. It will be open until October 30th.
Miscellaneous
- The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Administrators' newsletter – November 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC was closed with the consensus that the resysop criteria should be made stricter.
- The follow-up RfC to develop that change is now open at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2).
- A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors may now nominate themselves as candidates for the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The self-nomination period will close November 12, with voting running from November 19 through December 2.
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
1st Air Cavalry Brigade
Hello,
Can you please delete 1st Air Cavalry Brigade so i can move Combat Aviation Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division there. Thank you. Gavbadger (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Gavbadger: I am not an admin and thus can't delete articles. You can tag 1st Air Cavalry Brigade for G6 speedy deletion to clear the way for the move. Deor (talk) 21:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Anniston, Alabama
You need to tell me specifically what you need a reference for. I've been doing these population boxes and will be incorporating them into every locale for Alabama. These figures come directly from each census for Alabama returns from 1820-2010.DJ Jones74 (talk) 22:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- @DJ Jones74: Please see WP:V and WP:REF. Any information added to a Wikipedia article without citing, within the article, a reliable source is subject to removal by any editor (in this case, this applies both to the data in the table and the comments in your notes to particular table entries—which notes, by the way, should probably be in a separate note list [see Template:Efn] rather than mixed with the references). In addition, the information you're adding to Anniston, Alabama belongs in the existing "Demographics" section rather than in a separate section. I'm not going to start an edit war by reverting you again, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if your additions are reverted by other editors who happen to notice them. Deor (talk) 23:34, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- I've run this template by another editor, who saw no particular problem with them. When someone reverts an edit without a specific mention of what sort of reference they wish, it is entirely unhelpful to me. Unless you cite exactly what reference will satisfy you as acceptable, I cannot read your mind. Do you wish a specific link on each census year to the Alabama returns ? If that is satisfactory, I can do that, but sometimes it has a habit of overloading the reference section below. The figures come from the exact same location as the basic population history box, for which I'm the one who has been responsible for adding. I'm not an expert at HTML, it took me some time to come up with the template itself. I can also alter the refs to footnotes within the template, so again it doesn't flood the bottom of the page, I was not sure what the code was for footnotes. I can also alter the header of hist. demographics to be a subsection as well of demographics, so no problem there. Again, let me know if linking each year to the census document will be enough to suit the references you want. Regards DJ Jones74 (talk) 00:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Are the census figures (and the material in the explanatory notes, about the largest towns in Alabama, etc.) taken from a single book or document, from multiple books or documents, or from an online source? Does the source(s) contain all the data in the chart, including the racial breakdowns? If I knew what kind of material you're working with, I could give you better advice on how to reference it properly. Deor (talk) 08:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- I just realized I should thank you for catching the problem with the notes vs. references on the template. If you hadn't noticed the problem with the Anniston entry, I'd have kept going on with it and then had to go back and re-do countless templates and entries once someone eventually pointed it out. I haven't done a "notes" entry in so many years that it had slipped my mind that I fell straight into using the <ref> <ref>.
- As for the rest, the figures and racial stats come directly from the census reports for each decade (i.e. for the 2010 census, this is the reference used exclusively for Alabama: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-1-2.pdf ) At present, I'm entering the places by alphabetical order and then intend to do cumulative pages that shows the rankings of places and counties per state per census. Regards, DJ Jones74 (talk) 09:09, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @DJ Jones74: OK, I think a good way of referencing the table would be to add a citation of the relevant document after each year number in the first column, including the page numbers on which the data in that row can be found. If necessary, the information in the explanatory notes should have separate refs. Also, can't the information in the "Historical population" table for Anniston (i.e., the "%±" column and the 2018 estimated population) be worked into the big table, so that table could be eliminated? Deor (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, adding the ref link on the census year seems to work. I did that already on one page. You make a good point about trying to merge the hist. pop table with the new template (and adding a column for the "%±"), although since it's a preexisting table with its own formula, I'm not entirely sure how to work it into mine. The sole problem with adding the latest estimated population (2018) is that there's no racial stats to accompany it, so it would be a blank row.DJ Jones74 (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- @DJ Jones74: OK, I think a good way of referencing the table would be to add a citation of the relevant document after each year number in the first column, including the page numbers on which the data in that row can be found. If necessary, the information in the explanatory notes should have separate refs. Also, can't the information in the "Historical population" table for Anniston (i.e., the "%±" column and the 2018 estimated population) be worked into the big table, so that table could be eliminated? Deor (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Are the census figures (and the material in the explanatory notes, about the largest towns in Alabama, etc.) taken from a single book or document, from multiple books or documents, or from an online source? Does the source(s) contain all the data in the chart, including the racial breakdowns? If I knew what kind of material you're working with, I could give you better advice on how to reference it properly. Deor (talk) 08:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- I've run this template by another editor, who saw no particular problem with them. When someone reverts an edit without a specific mention of what sort of reference they wish, it is entirely unhelpful to me. Unless you cite exactly what reference will satisfy you as acceptable, I cannot read your mind. Do you wish a specific link on each census year to the Alabama returns ? If that is satisfactory, I can do that, but sometimes it has a habit of overloading the reference section below. The figures come from the exact same location as the basic population history box, for which I'm the one who has been responsible for adding. I'm not an expert at HTML, it took me some time to come up with the template itself. I can also alter the refs to footnotes within the template, so again it doesn't flood the bottom of the page, I was not sure what the code was for footnotes. I can also alter the header of hist. demographics to be a subsection as well of demographics, so no problem there. Again, let me know if linking each year to the census document will be enough to suit the references you want. Regards DJ Jones74 (talk) 00:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Administrator changes
- EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
- Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
CheckUser changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
Technical news
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
Resysop request
I have restored your admin bit, per your request at WP:BN. Useight (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:55, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Cheers
|
Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well DMarnetteD|Talk 02:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
Push pin map on New Albion article
Hello Doer. While I've thanked you in the Teahouse, please again accept my appreciation. I double-checked the coordinates with an online tool, and the coordinates you provided were precise to Drake's Cove. With such assistance, I am hopeful for an eventual GA designation.
For a Dark Ages person, you cope well with 21st century digital technology.Hu Nhu (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)