User talk:Darkness Shines/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 9

Please comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Sources

Could you enable the "Email this user" feature on your account? (Just give an non-personal email address in your preferences, it remains unseen to other editors as long as you don't write an email. But people can write you emails.) I have several interesting sources regarding some articles to share. (BTW, Magog, has totally lost it now. [1] Indian nationalists? Off-wikipedia canvassing? TopGun bringing out "lousy editors"?) Regards, JCAla (talk) 08:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation and evolution in public education

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation and evolution in public education. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	New Year Greetings for 2012!
	Happy New Year to you, Darkness Shines! Thanks for your contributions to defence and security related articles on India. A note of advice. Please be civil at all times to all editors even if you feel you are provoked. We have too few editors on Indian topics to lose someone like you. We value your contributions. AshLin (talk) 13:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Three-revert warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --lTopGunl (talk) 14:37, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I am new to this.

I have been trying to update the article on Sir Paul Judge who I know well who has many references on the web and is a well know figure.

It appears that most of what I input has been deleted but I am unclear why.

As far as I know all the information I put in is accurate.

I see one contribution asking about possible confusion between Sir Paul Judge of the UK (who is the one I was editing) and a Dr Paul Q. Judge who appears to be from the US. Is this the problem?

Please let me have some input as to what is happening as the article which now appears seems to be minimal.

Willchurch (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Georgia (country)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georgia (country). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Just a friendly heads up

If you are going to decline submissions, please don't nominate them for speedy deletion unless they are blatent violations of policy. Also, you warned a generic user that has not edited in six years about the article. Please be more careful next time as you could really turn somebody off to Wikipedia if you do it wrong. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Sridhar Teegala de-prod and to WP:AfD

Hi! Sridhar Teegala now at WP:AfD. Even tho it was the user who started the article who removed the WP:PROD tag, this still amounts to contesting the PROD. A silly technicality? I think so! --Shirt58 (talk) 08:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I thought a prod tag could not be removed by the creator of an article unless he added citations? But yes, a very silly technicality. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

You are correct, Darkness. Removing this type of PROD without adding sources is vandalism. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 09:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

(a) I think Seb is wrong about this.

(b) Or maybe I'm wrong about this.

(c) Meh. Not worth arguing about.

--Shirt58 (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Russell Mark

Please note I have removed the BLPPROD nomination from this page as it only applies to articles created after March 2010. Camw (talk) 11:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

For Magog, when he comes over to be an ogre

TG canvassingCalls an IP editor a trollFails to AGF, calls an RFC pointyadding references to an article is also naughtyCalls myself a troll in this section. He just reverted all the references I added to the article out That is bloody disruptive editing And of course there was all of this.

Comments by accused

• I have not broken 3RR once on any article, which explains why TG has failed to supply any difs. I have acted in accordance with policy at all times, all content remove or added adheres to WP:V & WP:NPOV. I have never enabled the e-mail function, and I fail to see what this has to do with anything either? This is an obvious case of an editor trying to gain the upper hand by looking for a block of a perceived opponent. The edit warrior here is in fact TG. [2][3][4]. Edit wars uncited content into an article. [5] Reverets in unsourced content. Other states of India:- Citation needed. Various editors arguing with TG over his edit warring uncited content into an article. When pointed out on his talk page his habit of reverting unsourced content into articles[6] he says "Blah"[7]
• Please provide a dff were I have made PA against you since I was asked not to Darkness Shines (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I've given the talk page and admins can see it since it's full of it. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

No, you need to provide a diff were I have made a PA against you since I was asked not to. Please write only in your own section above.

• Indo-Pakistani Air War of 1965 Has only two reverts by myself since 15:38, 30 December 2011 Which was explained on the talk page [8] TG has also has two reverts to this article in the same time period.[9][10]
• Separatist movements of India Has two reverts by myself since 16:11, 30 December 2011 Which was explained on the article talk page Unexplained removal TG has also two reverts in the same time period. [11][12] Note, the majority of this content was not sourced.
• Inter-Services Intelligence has one revert by myself since 23:05, 11 December 2011‎ Which was also brought to the talk page [13] Darkness Shines (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
• Taliban has exactly one revert by myself ever. [14] Also brought to the talk page [15] TG on the other hand has three reverts on this article today. [16] [17][That is bloody disruptive editing] Please note, my edit fixed a misrepresentation of a source.
• Anti-Pakistan sentiment I did reach 3RR on this article, due to an IP editor misrepresenting a source [18] I also brought this to the talk page [19] were my view was supported by another editor.

• I also do not appreciate TG canvassing an administrator [20] whom I have had a personal disagreement with[21].
• I have asked TG to amend his new statements [22] As the two article he says I reached and broke 3r on are not correct.
• TG seems to think that my adding of a tag[23] to an article is a revert? [24] Does adding a tag really count as a revert?
• I would appreciate you actually looking through it all. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: ANI

Someone mentioned in the ANI thread that you're too liberal calling edits vandalism. Do you use Twinkle? There is a setting in your preferences under "Gadgets" called Twinkle. It adds a new rollback button called "Rollback (AGF)" to your article history list so the edit summary says "Reverting good faith edits by ...." It's helpful.--v/r - TP 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes I do use twinkle, thanks for the advice :o) Darkness Shines (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Gone for fags

If I am blocked upon my return for that ANI report I will seriously wet my pants. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC) Not such an Ogre after all [25] Perhaps he has a sense of humor:0) Darkness Shines (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha. Having the tea. Cheers. JCAla (talk) 18:55, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your tireless efforts to improve the factual accuracy of political articles. JCAla (talk) 09:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Referring to this in particular. JCAla (talk) 09:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, that is really kind :o) Darkness Shines (talk) 16:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

About your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sridhar Teegala

Hi Darkness! I would venture to suggest that the underlined part of your comment,

Delete. Per the two users above, and also just to annoy the bloody spammer who created such havoc

may quite possibly not be the best turn of phrase to use at WP:AFD discussions. Please be assured that I am most certainly not sending this little note to annoy you... though I admit it may well have that effect.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I know your right, but he was an irritating spammer :o) Darkness Shines (talk) 16:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

That should be "I know you're right" :-P Wikipedia has rules we have to adhere to, and WP:CIVIL applies even to irritating editors. Keep up the good work, Darkness. Shirt "irritating apostrophe usage stickler" 58 (talk) 10:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Wood Mackenzie Company Profile

Hello

I'm new to Wikipedia, and last week I posted a profile for the company I work for. I think you may have deleted it, is that right?

Please advise what I should do to successfully create a company profile. Should I tag it as an advert (is that what other companies do with their profiles?), or could I adjust the wording to something you would accept (and could you point me to some examples I can look at please?).

Thanks Paul.rowllings (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Paul

Hi. I answreed your questions about the links. Did you receive this? Thanks Paul.rowllings (talk) 09:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Taliban. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

And just to be clear, both to you, Darkness Shines, and for the sake of any admin reviewing this block (which you're free to object to): this did not happen in a vacuum. If it had, you definitely would not have been blocked. However, there is quite some history on this page of bickering, as you well know, as well as disruption by all parties involved (stalking, edit warring, accusations of bad conduct, frequent bad faith reports to noticeboards, etc.). Also, you added some fairly bold content to an article, which was removed, but which you then readded. That's not cool; TopGun has the right to remove it if he believes it violates WP:NPOV (sourced content is irrelevant if it violates NPOV) - even if you think it doesn't violate NPOV. Let me make this abundantly clear: you will not get your point of view across in this dispute by means of ramming it through on edit warring. That is not how dispute resolution works.

Now I understand you might be upset that I blocked you and not TopGun. Fine; you're right, TopGun has edit warred before. If he had been the aggressor today, I would have blocked him. And I will block him. But we're not talking about him here; we're talking about your conduct (WP:NOTTHEM). And this most recent event was the straw that broke the camel's back, so to speak.

Finally, understand once again, that I am not against your POV in this dispute at all, and that I think you probably have a point, but that you're not going about it the right way. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

There was an edit conflict. I do not understand you at all. I did one revert, one. TG removed reams of reliably sourced content for no reason other than he does not like it. This is a bad block. Darkness Shines (talk) 02:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Another thing, I have asked TG for sources for his POV many many times on the Taliban talk page.this section this section and this one He never supply's and sources, just points to this which he seems to think covers any edit to the article. How am I to add what he demands if he never provides sources? All he does is revert and then prevaricates. It is not possible to edit with a person who says my edits are not NPOV but never provides sources for an opposing POV. Tell me, what does one do in that situation? Darkness Shines (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have had but one revert[26] since 1 January 2012 Were is the edit war? As can be seen in the section below I am preparing an RFC. I was not, nor did I intend to edit war. I ask I be unblocked so I can post the RFC. Darkness Shines (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your block has already expired. --MuZemike 03:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Edit interrupted by block. Leading Muslims have been highly critical of the Taliban interpretations of Islam.

Jehovah's Witnesses Beliefs

The link you provided http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/doctrine-changes/jehovah-witness-beliefs/ is not a page written by Jehovah's witnesses, but by an organization opposed to Jehovah's Witnesses, therefore, the material presented does not come from the Christian congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses. I just thought I would let you know. I have submitted the page for speedy deletion, since it is a clearcut case of copyright infringement. Willietell (talk) 02:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

You'd think, they'd realize

Hi there, how is it going? You'd think after we were calmly and gently going our editing, and suddenly certain editor comes back with the same behavior, people would realize where things are coming from. But I at least see a more (not yet fully) balanced approach. JCAla (talk) 08:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

This is what you get for expanding an article with the highest quality sources. And to think he edit wars unsourced content into articles on a regular basis, then has the temerity to remove swathes of reliably sourced content. He still will not provide sources for his POV, how many times have I asked him now? And all he does is point to that stupid NPOV thread. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Which (NPOV thread) isn't even relevant at all to this issue. I don't have the whiskey for you, but I am awarding you The Barnstar of Good Humor.

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For showing good humor during situations of dispute. JCAla (talk) 08:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, with any luck the RFC I am working on will do the job. I will have to ignore him though, lest it go the way of the previous one Darkness Shines (talk) 08:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, true. Otherwise it will be difficult for others to join the discussion. JCAla (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

TParis gets it wrong.

[27] I was saying as the majority of sources use ISI and military then so should we. Perhaps I ought to have been clearer. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that is what I also told him. JCAla (talk) 20:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Maybe he will understand, maybe not. I wish I had a TV, I am bored witless. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

He won't. Tell him to read (2010)India, Pakistan, and Democracy: Solving the Puzzle of Divergent PathsRoutledge ISBN 978-0415780186 pp180-181 ought to do it. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Taliban

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Taliban. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Prepare RFC

{{rfc|pol|hist}}

Should the following content be added to the article?

The Taliban were largely founded by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in 1994. The ISI used the Taliban to establish a regime in Afghanistan which would be favorable to Pakistan, as they were trying to gain strategic depth in the North West. Since the creation of the Taliban the ISI and the Pakistani military have given financial, logistical and military support. At first the Taliban numbered in the hundreds, and were badly equipped and low on munitions. Within months however 15,000 students arrived from the Madrassas in Pakistan. A Pakistani artillery attack on the border town of Spin Boldak allowed the Taliban to seize the town as well as the munitions dump in Pasha. The ISI also helped with the construction of terrorist training camps to both the Taliban and Al Qaeda. In 1997 after the capture of Kabul by the Taliban Pakistan gave $30 million in aid and a further $10 million for government wages. In 2000 British Intelligence reported that the ISI were taking an active role in several training camps. In 2001 Pakistan claimed to have ended their support for the Taliban after the 9/11 attacks. With the fall of Kabul to anti Taliban forces in November 2001 ISI forces worked with Taliban militias who were in full retreat. Former Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf wrote in his memoirs that Richard Armitage, the former US deputy secretary of state, said Pakistan would be "bombed back to the stone-age" if it continued to support the Taliban. Pakistan has been accused of continuing to support the Taliban since 9/11, an allegation Pakistan denies.

References in here
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Discussion of proposal

• Support As proposer, content is well sourced to academic publishing houses and is factual and accurate, as can be seen from the extensive quotes supplied.

American Reaction

At the beginning in 1994 the US did not object to the Taliban, and was seen by some as actually supporting them. Within a week of the 9/11 attacks the first Central Intelligence Agency(CIA) agents arrived in Afghanistan with the task of making contact with the Northern Alliance

Lede rewrite

The Taliban (Pashto: طالبان), alternative spelling Taleban, (ṭālibān, meaning "students" in Arabic) is an Islamist militant and political group that ruled large parts of Afghanistan and its capital, Kabul, as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan from September 1996 until October 2001. It gained diplomatic recognition from only three states: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. The main leader of the Taliban movement is Mullah Mohammed Omar.

While in power, the Taliban enforced one of the strictest interpretations of Sharia law ever seen in the Muslim world, and leading Muslims have been highly critical of the Taliban interpretations of Islamic law. The Taliban were condemned internationally for their brutal repression of women. Most Taliban leaders were influenced by Deobandi fundamentalism, and many also strictly follow the social and cultural norm called Pashtunwali. The Taliban movement is primarily made up of members belonging to Pashtun tribes, the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan.

From 1995-2001, the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence and military are widely alleged by the international community to have provided support to the Taliban in their rise to power and fight against anti-Taliban forces though Pakistan denies giving aid since 9/11. The Taliban and their allies committed massacres against Afghan civilians and conducted a policy of scorched earth during their rule from 1996-2001. They use Terrorism as a specific tactic to further their ideological and political goals. From 2001 to 2007 there were 940 terrorist attacks, with the Taliban responsible for 58% of them.

After the attacks of September 11, 2001 the Taliban were overthrown by Operation Enduring Freedom. Later it regrouped as an insurgency movement to fight the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (established in late 2001) and the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). Today the Taliban operate in Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan. It is believed their current major headquarters are Quetta in Pakistan.

Source

There is also this interesting source:

Hussain, Zahid (2007). Frontline Pakistan: The Struggle With Militant Islam. Columbia University Press. p. 107. ISBN 0 85368 769 2.

• 1994-2001: ISI and Taliban
• Immediately post 9/11 in late 2001: "However, Pakistani intelligence agencies maintained some degree of cooperation with the Taliban elements fleeing the fighting."

JCAla (talk) 10:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Nice find, I shall add it to the above narrative. Thanks. Seen this [28] He appears not to have realized our unblock request are being ignored :o) Because we are [very naughty boys Darkness Shines (talk) 11:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

LOL! If I hadn't awarded you the good humor barnstar yet, I'd do it right now. Note also, how, IPs suddenly try to draw people into edit wars over topics involving certain editors [29] (not referring to Rdavi here, whom I encoutered as a reasonable editor). TopGun is not doing himself a favour with what he wrote. JCAla (talk) 11:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Ya saw that, pity the buggers never use the talk page. And is it not strange that a new IP comes along to edit war over what another IP edit warred over ;o) Darkness Shines (talk) 11:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Coincidence? JCAla (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Both IP`s are English. Both us BT Darkness Shines (talk) 11:57, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Ha, I'd mention to Magog that being strange and needing analysis for being strange, but they keep telling me about that chutzpah thing. ;) JCAla (talk) 11:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

I told him [30]. I mean, honestly, does it get more obvious than that? And be aware of what was written here including you since TG has removed it from his talk page. JCAla (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Do I am to be permanently banned even though I have never broken 3R? And what tit-for-tat filings? I have not filed at ANI or else were. This is wrong. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

That might have been a very strong warning to all involved. I guess admins will look carefully in the next days how things are being handled. So, let's be the perfect gentle people. Do you have a tie and a topper? ;) JCAla (talk) 17:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

• No but I do have a cane with a sword in :o) It would appear I am to serve my full time :o( For one revert. I really thought it would be knocked down to 12 for good behavior :o) After all, I have not used my Shiv on anyone :o) Darkness Shines (talk) 18:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

You have such a cane with a sword? I like them. Sometimes see people going for a walk with such thing. I think the cane/sword fits more to a "gentleman" than the shiv thing. If you don't break parole you might still get away with the 24h custody. ;) JCAla (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

• Be aware of this attempt. JCAla (talk) 20:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

• No comment. JCAla (talk) 20:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Confederate government of Kentucky

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Confederate government of Kentucky. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Taliban Economy

Hi, do you mind me adding something to your economy sandbox re Taliban economy? JCAla (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Of course not, thanks for helping Darkness Shines (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I am adding it there, since it seems logical to have it in one place. When you start disagreeing with my additions, I'll take it to my own place and we can discuss. Let me know. JCAla (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Not disagreeing with your additions, I will move stuff around though for flow and narrative purposes. Once it is done we can fiddle over the finer aspects. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Socks and IP

I think you should be more concerned about those ips your dealing with than my perceived fake account

regards,

Billy Suppositries (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2011

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2011. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Indians in Afghanistan

Hi there, seems as if the article is staying. Going to rewrite some things then, because in its current form it's just WP:COATRACK. JCAla (talk) 09:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

What I wanted to know, do you still count on that article being deleted? JCAla (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I hope it will be, it is just a POV fork. If not then I suppose when time allows I will try and fix it. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The thing is, I have the content, but if I add it now, then the deletion request will probably become unnecessary anyways. JCAla (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Well I suspect it will be kept, you may as well add it. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that is what I suspect too. Since the article is of poor quality, it should at least be improved then. JCAla (talk) 17:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

have not forgotten your sources

I got sucked back into that university dispute, then got a job that needs to be done by this morning. Maybe I will be able to get to them later in the day. But I am not blowing you off.

No rush Elin, thanks for taking the time. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Taliban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afghani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Taliban

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Taliban. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

I'm new so hope I'm doing this correctly. Thank you for your note on my page and the cookies. Wikkiwitchh (talk) 18:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Muhammad Iqbal

As the CSD tagger that started this whole thing, you may be interested in the discussion going on at this page. Roughly, the article was not eligible for G12 because of its history, and has been undeleted to a subpage pending an investigation. Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 17:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catholic Church and abortion

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and abortion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Advice

Regarding User_talk:BOMC#Three_Witnesses I apologize, the wording of your statement threw me off. I thought you were saying "For, your edits do not use..." lol. I will take your advice, thanks for the input!BOMC (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human rights in Estonia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human rights in Estonia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Darkness Shines, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:Darkness Shines/sandbox.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:East Germany

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:East Germany. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)