User talk:Czj/Archive2
What follows is a message archive. Please do not modify it. Use User talk:Czj to leave me a new message; not this page.
IMAX
editit wasn't vandilism, read the discussion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.51.246 (talk • contribs)
- Thanks, and my apologies about that -- I have removed the content again. It looked like a meaningless blanking to me, so I was quick to revert. I will remove the warning from your talk page. Please use edit summaries ("Removing section per discussion on talk page" or somesuch would've been sufficient) so that this sort of reverting mistake is less likely to happen again. Thank you again for alerting me to this. --Czj 06:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Belleke
editCould you report this user to the admins? I would, but I do believe he's just trying to harass me for putting the dbspeedy tag on his article. -WarthogDemon 06:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Will do. --Czj 06:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- It has been done. He has violated WP:3RR now on your userpage and is sure to get banned. --Czj 06:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Ironic thing is when he started blanking my page, I was hoping that today I'd pass 50 on my vandal count. Vandal count isn't a popularity contest of course, but I'm somewhat thrilled nonetheless. :) -WarthogDemon 06:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Oscars and Academy Awards
editPlease continue with the work of getting that ridiculous singular noun situation removed over at "Academy Awards". The article indeed is focused on the ceremony and not the actual award itself. Seems incredible that the people reverting you back to "Award" are so misguidedly misinterpreting policy. It seems to be a problem on Wikipedia, that is, overzealousness thinly veiled with citations of policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oscarseats (talk • contribs)
Greetings --
New to Wikipedia, and have just written a new entry about the [Aurora Regional Fire Museum]. Apparently our standard "blurb" text (written by me) has been used by another website (with our permission) and this has caused red flags to come up as a copyright violation.
I am the Curator of the Museum, the original author of this text, and also the museum's webmaster. You will find most of this same text printed on our webstite --
[[1]]
and also here [[2]]
Any assistance you might provide would be appreciated.
- David - David Lewis dlewisarfm@aol.com
- Thanks for the clarification, but this will still need to be re-written in a more encyclopedic format per WP:STYLE. I will, however, remove the copyvio notice. I will help work on this article when I get a chance, but I'm swamped with other things for the rest of the week. I have added the "tone" and "cleanup" tags, which might signal other editors to come help as well. Thank you for adding your museum to Wikipedia. --Czj 09:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
What are you going to do with this debate in Wikipedia:redirects for discussion? It's been over a week without receiving final results. --Gh87 21:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Almost forgot, you must add {{subst:rfd top}} and {{rfd bottom}} with the whole debate inbetween. --Gh87 01:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Pringles/Punks and Nerds
editI agree that the Pringles incident should be included in the Punks and Nerds article, however as of right now it's up for deletion and needs to be discussed whether to be kept or not. Rather than spending the time working on a Pringles mention in the article (in case it does get deleted and the time you spent on it is moot), please contribute to the discussion to keeping or deleting the article, whichever you find more appropriate for the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joshmirman (talk • contribs) 20:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
- My comment on that article was made back in July -- long before it was up for deletion. Thanks for alerting me to the AfD, though, and I have voted to keep. --Czj 02:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
State of the Union
editGreat work on the State of the Union, getting down each item. Tedious but important. ~ Rollo44 04:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! You too! We collaborated very well tonight. :) --Czj 04:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: Just a tip
editI know however in all but one case both SOTU Address and SOTU address already existed and were redirects to the other. I was unable to move those article when I tried so I copied. None of those article had histories of more than a few entries anyway. Can an admin move and overright articles in this instance? --Daysleeper47 21:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
What are you talking about??? There's so much work to do on that article that you can't stop editing it now!!! :)--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 01:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
yea
edithey, this is a public computer in bay village at a library. im not sure who made the changes, but im not sure if you'd want to block the IP adress if they persist, just incase anyone who wants to make an important change has something to add/edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.21.13 (talk • contribs)
- Thanks for telling me. I've tagged the IP's talk page with a "sharedip" template, and administrators should have more leniency before blocking (basically, it will only be done if absolutely necessary, and not for as long). I would recommend registering your own account for editing if you wish to circumvent any further warnings which do not apply to you. --Czj 07:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
About archiveing my page
editWell sorry for not knowing what wikipedians (dictators) expect from me i did not know--"P-Machine" 06:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Technical Rescue
editI don't think you have a link to this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_rescue —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MindyBlock (talk • contribs) 12:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC). No longer exists.
Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)