Crocross1234, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Crocross1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Crowen has been accepted

edit
 
Susan Crowen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creepTalk 16:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: T.J. Crowen (February 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 12:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas J. Crowen (March 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas J. Crowen

edit

  Hello, Crocross1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas J. Crowen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas J. Crowen

edit
 

Hello, Crocross1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas J. Crowen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Edward Augustin Aikin has been accepted

edit
 
William Edward Augustin Aikin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 06:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Crocross1234. Thank you for your work on William Edward Augustin Aikin. Ldm1954, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please organize better the "Other Accomplishments" list, perhaps by year. Currently they seem somewhat random.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 06:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Crocross1234. Thank you for your work on William Edward Augustin Aikin. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this page for an interesting 19th century polymath! It would be great to see this integrated more into the project, perhaps by linking from other pages.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Crocross1234. Thank you for your work on Tallman-Budke House. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply