Critisizer
Welcome!
Hello, Critisizer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Shalom (Hello • Peace) 21:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008 edit
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Greek citron has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, all discussions should stay on the talk page or be archived. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Citron edits edit
You are doing a great job, keep on! Shoteh (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Typography edit
Hi! Thank you for creating the WikiProject Typography! I think there was an urgent need for this project. There is a lot of work to do building up this project, so I think we should invite some other Wikipedians. I am really excited and looking forward to great cooperation. Kind regards, — Tirk·fl “…” 07:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- This is to say Hi and introduce myself! As you will see, I've added my name to the list. As a former typographer and graphic designer I have more than a passing interest in the subject. I have made contributions to a number of typography-related articles, and will endeavour to continue to do so. I tend more towards biographies of typographers, type designers, etc. and have a number of edits to Gill, Froshaug, Eckersley, Lubalin, Morrison, Tschichold, Ruari Mclean, et al to my credit. Not to mention Comic Sans (no, don't mention it!) I can't promise to be a regular contributor, but I will do my best. Cheers – Agendum (talk) 14:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Yidishe Zeitung.png edit
Thank you for uploading File:Yidishe Zeitung.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 07:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
The article Nadia Talent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A single publication doesn't establish WP:Notability (persons).
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 18:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Categorization of people edit
Just so you know for future reference, we categorize people by what they are, not by subject keywords or characteristics of the article. For example, a pomologist goes in Category:Pomologists, not Category:Fruit, and a botanist goes in Category:Botanists, not Category:Botany. And neither of them goes in Category:Biography, which is for things where the topic is a biography. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 03:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- On the talk pages, usually just {{WPBiography}} is fine. The information you need to enter right away is =yes or =no in the "living" field, =Last Name, First Name in the "listas" field and =yes in the "s&a-work-group" if it's a scientist or academic. "Class" and "priority" are fields you don't have to fill in if you're not familiar with the system of how those things are rated; in theory somebody will eventually come along and assign the appropriate ratings. Sometimes there are extra project templates that you can use, but you'd need to consult Wikipedia:WikiProject Science to determine what the most appropriate subproject is for each individual person (or "WikiProject Sports" if you write one about an athlete, etc., but I'm guessing you're interested mainly in scientists :-) Bearcat (talk) 04:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nadia Talent edit
You may also wish to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nadia Talent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Smartse (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Corfu Ghetto.jpg edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Corfu Ghetto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Corfusynagogue.jpg edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Corfusynagogue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:CorfuSemetary.jpg edit
A tag has been placed on File:CorfuSemetary.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Dried Etrog.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Musaiaca.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)