User talk:CrafterNova/Archive/October 2022

Latest comment: 1 year ago by CrafterNova in topic Help me

"Template:Es" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Es and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 1#Template:Es until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Temperature-responsive polymer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UCST.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Benzamide
added a link pointing to Pyramide
Depyrogenation
added a link pointing to Pyrogen

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

"Template:R from sub" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R from sub and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14#Template:R from sub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks.. Also added your guestbook on a list

Thanks also for signing mine. I have added your guestbook here on your behalf. Feel free to undo it. Happy editing...Volten001 20:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you and welcome. Happy editing to you too! —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 12:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red November 2022

 
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Help me

Please help me with a new biographical article Thomas J. Martin

I'm writing this article about an Australian pathologist and have created a draft for it. I need help from expert BLP editors since there are very less reliable sources that I have found until now

Biographical sources:

  • Centre for Transformative Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology. "Martin, Thomas John (Jack) - Person - Encyclopedia of Australian Science and Innovation". www.eoas.info. Retrieved 2022-10-29.
  • Fioritti, Nathan (2016-11-22). "Professor Emeritus Thomas John Martin AO". Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences. Retrieved 2022-10-29.

Scientific sources:

See my response at the Teahouse just now. Incidentally, I doubt that the person who wrote the Tetrahedron Letters article is the Martin you are interested in. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Maybe. I found the journal article on Google Scholar and copied it here so fast. Finding reliable sources is so hard especially when you write your first article. Perhaps you can help me by searching for a few more sources? — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 14:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Creating articles is really hard! That's why if you look at the Teahouse regularly you'll find newcomers to editing getting frustrated and being advised to stick to editing existing articles for many months to gain experience. Any Draft you create for Martin should be based on the two biographical sources you already have (there may be more, I haven't looked). One of them says he published hundreds of papers but if you want to find his most highly cited ones you need to be sure when you use Google Scholar that you have the correct person. Look at the institution / address in the authorship details for the highly cited papers which Google puts before the less cited ones. The point is that the biographies are about Martin while anything he has published is by him but not about him. In convincing new article reviewers that Martin is noteworthy enough to merit an article in Wikipedia, it is the former that matter. In creating drafts, quality is more important than quantity: you only need about WP:THREE WP:INDEPENDENT WP:SECONDARY sources. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Now I better understand since I have to look for the "institution / address in the authorship details" like you said. I have already found one or two independent sources, so finding more seems easier since now I know how to search for the correct person. Thank you so much ;) — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 16:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)