Your submission at Articles for creation: Edaphobacter aggregans has been accepted edit

 
Edaphobacter aggregans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm an accredited new article reviewer and therefore I have the ability to approve or reject articles. Reviewers must:
  • Have a Wikipedia account at least 90 days old
  • Have a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles
  • Have thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions
  • Have a good understanding of the policies mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including the various special notability guidelines
  • Review solely on a volunteer basis. Soliciting or accepting payment for a review is prohibited.
If you need more information check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Dan arndt (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm not exactly certain what you are exactly asking. I'm presuming that it something to do with the edits I made before approving the draft? Dan arndt (talk) 03:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Okay that makes more sense. I simply looked at other similar articles, such as Edaphobacter modestus and imported the format from that article (i.e. Infobox, scientific classification and taxon identifiers). Obviously I checked to make sure that the links/sources were all correct before adding them. There is not automated bot that I am aware of that does that for you - its all manually done. I hope that helps - happy editing. Dan arndt (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acanthopleuribacter pedis has been accepted edit

 
Acanthopleuribacter pedis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:08, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hi Coralizzie1, welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad to see another editor interested in microbiology! We could use many many more hands around here. If you have questions getting started, or are looking for places to help, please let me know! You can respond to my message on your talk page here, or post on my talk page. Glad to have you on board! I hope you decide to stick around. Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Coralizzie1, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Coralizzie1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holophage (January 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 20:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holophage (January 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acidicapsa ferrireducens has been accepted edit

 
Acidicapsa ferrireducens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ajpolino (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blastocatellia has been accepted edit

 
Blastocatellia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ajpolino (talk) 22:45, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Holophage edit

 

Hello, Coralizzie1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holophage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 18:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply