Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Christopher michell! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: User:Christopher michell/sandbox has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Christopher michell/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Graeme McLagan has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Graeme McLagan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graeme McLagan (February 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aseleste was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 22:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Christopher michell! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Graeme McLagan/former BBC Home Affirs correspondent and writer on crime and police., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graeme McLagan has been accepted

edit
 
Graeme McLagan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hope you don't mind, but I created the typical sections. For the books, appropriate to add publisher and ISBN. David notMD (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply